ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 74,372
Showing a number of papers being retracted does not make that point, even if the cause was ethics violations. The paper I presented gives numbers in the 100s of thousands of papers on the topic just by 2021. Less than one percent having bad data, actually is quite a good amount of good information.In other words, and still the salient point, we were inundated with bad information, which, in turn, we employed by politicians in a naked power grab just because they could. Because we rolled over under the influence of faux fear and begged for a belly rub.
From the source I provided earlier:
According to Scopus (data cut, 1 August 2021), 210 183 COVID-19-related publications included 720 801 unique authors, of which 360 005 authors had published at least five full papers in their career and 23 520 authors were at the top 2% of their scientific subfield based on a career-long composite citation indicator
And here again, your bias reads the article and jumps to conclusions that have not been made .....which reinforces my point that the article was written, specifically, for people such as yourself. You don't care for the data, science is bad and did bad things!Neither has recovered, but politicians pat themselves on the back and partisans gloat with them.
I see no concern here with the validity of Covid claims that resulted in a general panic,
just a concerning tendency to protect Big (Obtrusive) Government in our lives.
BASED ON HURRIED, BAD and CLEARLY FLAWED PSUEDO-SCIENCE.
Ah, the power of the politician over the life of the individual.
Intoxicating! Science pales in the face of Political Science.