A HUSBAND'S PAYBACK ON TROPHY WIFE

[barefootgirl69]

It may be your thread, but you've posted in an open forum where ideas are shared. If you didn't want suggestions or opinions, why did you post it here AND in the SRP forum?

 

[000zing]

Yes, someone here is on an ego trip, hoping to blind us with poorly contrived attempts at intellectual superiority and mock indignation at the contributions of others.

We get them from time to time...

 

[MsYesMaybe]

MsYes, I hope that you will write the erotica story that you want to see in the world!

You clearly have an extremely specific vision, and nobody but you will be able to write it.

Story Ideas is meant to be a forum for sharing, developing, critiquing, and workshopping plots and story elements, but it seems like your ideas are fully crystalized as is, and you aren't looking for suggestions or input.

You may have misunderstood the purpose of this forum, and gotten overly defensive when people critiqued some elements of your plot. And once that happens, well... There's blood in the water and forums can turn into piranha pile-ons

So go! Go and be free! Write about CLUELESS KELLI and her DIAPHANOUS CAVALLI! Write it exactly as you imagine it!

I do recommend not using capslock when writing your story though, it could get auto-rejected for formatting

Thank you, Penny, for the positive support.

Specific, of course I am. About everything. Life is specific. We all live specific lives. As for "extremely"? Yes, but only by comparison here. Anywhere else where it's no more specific than average.

I don't feel at all I've misunderstood the forum's purpose. You really have to read Rob Royale's initial "feedback" in relationship to the forum's purpose for sharing, developing, critiquing, and workshopping plots and story elements. Only then will it be apparent.

 

[MsYesMaybe]

It may be your thread, but you've posted in an open forum where ideas are shared. If you didn't want suggestions or opinions, why did you post it here AND in the SRP forum.

It may be your thread, but you've posted in an open forum where ideas are shared. If you didn't want suggestions or opinions, why did you post it here AND in the SRP forum.

Be clear: I never said, indicated, or suggested in any way I didn't want suggestions

However, I also was unaware I should have made it clear I didn't want Nonsensical, Unrealistic, suggestions so cliche they make teeth ache

At this point from all the trolls trolling in business they've no reason to believe is either needed or wanted here or anywhere by anyone, I see how every knee jerk reaction attacks follow the exact same formula:

1 - condemnation of a broad misrepresentation and/or assumptions so baseless they could only be derived deliberately from aggressive misunderstanding.

2 - not one of these two cent self appointees bother to read the woeful tropes and cliches "suggested" nor dare they speak of them favorably.

. What this pattern reveals is disappointing yet unsurprisingly

 

[ElannaCalli]

A HUSBAND'S PAYBACK ON TROPHY WIFE TURNS INTO A REAL SHOW STOPPER

HAROLD is so upset at his wife KELLI for the way she dismisses his complaints about the dresses she wears to his company's parties he decides on the night of the company’s big end-of-the year awards event NOT TO TELL her that every time she is standing directly under any of the ballroom’s bright ceiling lights it caused a diaphanous effect the delicate white material of her strapless CAVALLI GOWN (which had already he deemed it "too sexy"and sparked an argument at home lasting the entire drive to the ballroom).

Harold tells himself any of the many guests in attendance would approach Kelli within the next 10 mins and give her the embarrassing news of the views she unwittingly is giving. Naturally she would come to him and insist they leave immediately to which he would agree (relieved he could cut short the boring misery of the event).

However, the very opposite happens: as the evening continues no one tells Kelli and Harold can see the men love the views given by a TIPSY KELLI Their delight heightened by how CLUELESS KELLI is of it. And whenever his tipsy wife - behavIng in a way she never had before from a few champagnes - strays away from under a light one of his colleagues is able to easily guide her back.

And as the evening event continues…things begin to happen increasingly seem by design to inexorably draw Kelli into being convinced to go ONSTAGE with ROYCE - the biggest rival colleague Harold has and the one he’s intimidated by - for the closing speech. Once there, Royce sneakily setsup the floor length hem of her gown for a wardrobe malfunction under the approving anticipation the audience are for her appearance onstage while Harold finds himself the most aroused he's ever been as he watches Kelli's DITZY DISCOVERY and her HELPLESS just before Royce pretends to assist, but intends her GOWN RIP DOWN from around her body, making Kelli a real “show stopper” no one will forget.

Trophy wife here

 

[MsYesMaybe]

Yes, someone here is on an ego trip, hoping to blind us with poorly contrived attempts at intellectual superiority and mock indignation at the contributions of others.

We get them from time to time...

What are you blathering on about? Dime a dozen troll told by ego his trolling is philosophical.
That line is far far back and up your crack.
On your bike, little timmy

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

MsYes, sadly, you seem to consider feedback on your outline as a personal attack. Rob's and my remarks came from our experience of having written a few stories. The general premise about such advice is that you can take it or leave it. If you dismiss our input and prefer to follow your outline as it is, fine - just write it. My feedback was provided from my personal belief that the story could benefit from addressing the mentioned 'fallacies'. It is based on what I believe worked for me. Your Mileage May Vary. However, feedback on feedback is nothing that helps your story because it is not me who is writing your story. As Penny said - go ahead and write your story. Just give us a shout in this thread when it is published, and you will already have some readers.

 

[MsYesMaybe]

MsYes, sadly, you seem to consider feedback on your outline as a personal attack. Rob's and my remarks came from our experience of having written a few stories. The general premise about such advice is that you can take it or leave it. If you dismiss our input and prefer to follow your outline as it is, fine - just write it. My feedback was provided from my personal belief that the story could benefit from addressing the mentioned 'fallacies'. It is based on what I believe worked for me. Your Mileage May Vary. However, feedback on feedback is nothing that helps your story because it is not me who is writing your story. As Penny said - go ahead and write your story. Just give us a shout in this thread when it is published, and you will already have some readers.

You're incorrect again. I didn't consider your feedback a personal attack. However, I did find it extremely slavish in its reliance on formulaic archetype and your mishandling of it to knowingly falsely label what I creatively wrote as 'fallacies.' while the entire time displaying a profound lack in self awareness in the hypocrisy of committing your own fallacies of appealing to authority (in this case, archetypes) misused to infer an impervious expertise not to be denied or dare disagreed with. And when I did - well within my right, the same right Rob Royale, in his follow up post referred to as " this is an open forum, I get to write whatever I want" - that's when you began to troll my thread with posts undeniably designed as personal attacks. As always, I will provide examples to support my retorts.


https://forum.literotica.com/threads/a-husbands-payback-on-trophy-wife.1648168/post-102207996

This is clearly a personal attack on me. Please don't embarrass yourself by claiming it's not meant to address me, but rather for "people who don't write." By action of intention posting it in my thread, it is a personal attack directed solely at me. You haven't a logical leg to stand on for denial. You know what it is. Be a grown up and own it. (oh and also? you were wrong again as evidenced here and all of my replies shutting down all of the other trolls AND my initial fictional story idea post: i DO write).

And then there's this one:

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/a-husbands-payback-on-trophy-wife.1648168/post-102211973

A most egregious personal attack. Vile and juvenile. An outright recklessly irresponsible act of invasion and dissemination of my privacy, done entirely with malicious intent. For you - or anyone, for that matter - to deny it would be the act of a clinically imbecilic shameless contrarian. Understand this is not name calling and cannot be twisted or misunderstood as such. It's a simple statement of fact.

Worse, you posted knowingly it has no place or purpose in this thread. Yet, you went ahead and did it anyway. How proud and witty you must have felt. I don't mind telling you how utterly disgusting I found it to be. It's an act succeeding in achieving a revealing tell of a hideously repugnant being masquerading as person touting himself as an above-it-all authority. That you felt entitled to post it without worry of a warning reprimand, or absolutely deserved outright ban, not to mention it's been allowed to publicly remain seen, raises a lot of questions.

If anything, this exacting takedown backed and supported with factual evidence - most damningly by your own callously petty hand - should stand as good reason why an author of a story idea post has the right to reply to any suggestions they find is intentionally abusive through sole negativity, especially when done from an entirely spiteful vengeance driven negative spewing narcissist point of view blaming the author for not finding it useful, let alone helpful, when it clearly isn't meant to.

As for you, Andreas?

Your intentions and actions are indefensible. Of course you'll deny and refuse acknowledging proof of the truth exposing the unequivocal cretinous hypocrite troll you are. And you're a fraud. Everyone should know it.

You're done. This is over. Understand?

 

[000zing]

You're incorrect again...

...to knowingly falsely label

Split infinitives rule, ok??

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

Wow, I hope the same amount of energy you invest here goes into your story, then it must advance well. Hope to read it soon.

Indeed my sarcastic remarks about non-writers and narcissistic personalities were critical of your behaviour. And thank you for confirming them through your answers.

Is anyone still following this thread? Or has everybody else left by now.