A nice word to describe a woman who enjoys sex.

[Debbie]

I agree, I like a woman that can think and give me a challenge, this is a turn on! If you want submissive, get a rubber doll!

I am submissive in the bedroom. It is something I love. Thankfully I have a brain also.

 

[October46]

I am submissive in the bedroom. It is something I love. Thankfully I have a brain also.

Sorry Debbie, didn't mean it that way, it is just that I want an engaging woman to make love to!

 

[Debbie]

Sorry Debbie, didn't mean it that way, it is just that I want an engaging woman to make love to!

It's ok. I wasn't offended. It is not something anyone (apart from lit and hubby) knows in my real life.

I think most people would assume that I do not get a say in our marriage or I am a good girl who does as she is told.

I hope you do find that someone special.

 

[Que]

Sorry Debbie, didn't mean it that way, it is just that I want an engaging woman to make love to!

You should just stop.

Submissives aren't "engaging?"

How about for a start, read Stella's post about roles and terminology.

You are clearly implying that submissives are somehow an easy lay, and that only a manly man, wise in the ways of the world can get a "real woman". That somehow the men who are attracted to submissives and more to the point the sort of man a submissive finds attractive are just not as sporting.

You have ALL of that backwards.

Being submissive requires a great deal of trust and they tend to have pretty good bullshit detectors as a defense mechanism.

As a contrast: some highly successful, powerfull men like to be submissive. From what I understand the chance to NOT be in charge for a change is liberating. Some manly men like it.

When I meet an engaging, smart, capable woman that is very much in charge in her everyday life...I wonder which role she assumes in the bedroom, but if forced to bet I'm going to go with submissive.

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[norfolklad]

Funny... When I first meet an engaging, smart, capable woman, I usually think of how best to introduce myself and not what role she assumes in the bedroom.

Like!

 

[Que]

Funny... When I first meet an engaging, smart, capable woman, I usually think of how best to introduce myself and not what role she assumes in the bedroom.

When you have to selectively edit and when you have to add words to other people's mouths you really aren't starting from a very good point of debate.

Impressive, your monk-like egalitarian view of women...if it never crosses you mind, great.

When I first meet people, men or women, I have no idea if they do or don't possess those qualities.

If I haven't introduced myself, I haven't met them at all.

Let's save some time here: You will call me childish, you'll leave in a snit and then you'll come back to attack again another day on another thread. You've done this to what 15 other people on this id alone?

 

[GiggLeGasm]

How do you tell a woman you love her nymphomania tendencies?
I could say "You are a seductive beautiful minx."

You would think that since we are 40 years into the empowerment of women that a word or two would have come along to express what I am looking for.

This is just such a contradiction to me.
As an "empowered" woman, I believe that he loves me in bed with everything that he tells me. I believe that the "in bed" is part of the overall picture.

The thing he says that makes me chuckle (mostly because it isn't true) -
"I can't keep up with you"
(typically said as he's entering for another round)

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[Que]

I didn't edit shit. Attached is a screenshot of your post. Even after you edited it, you forgot to put in "first." Face it, you're an idiot and that's the best quick fix you could think of.

You are right on one thing, I won't repeatedly fight with you on this thread. And, I will give you a hard time the next time you fuck up.

You ADDED "first" in your pathetic little barb. As in I have these awfull, sinful, lecherous thoughts when I FIRST meet a woman.

P.S. Sometimes I have thoughts like that about women I haven't met. And I am unrepentant about that.

P.P.S. I am indeed an idiot. You should be careful- people might not know when you're arguing with me that you're the smart one.

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[Que]

Edited what?

I didn't say "When I first meet"

I said (and your pedantic little screenshot bears out) "When I meet".

As in as "When I come to make the acquaintance of". In context one can see that this is the process of getting to know someone. HOW would I know about those qualities listed- from across the room while "thinking of a way to introduce myself."

My point was (not that it matters of course) that you FRAMED it differently by paraphrasing a small portion of my post when you bragged about your eunich-like thoughts when you FIRST meet a woman.

No, you didn't edit the snippet of a post you quoted, you edited the thought conveyed by the addition of 'first" in the re-frame.

There is one thing you are just brilliant at:

Causing a tempest in a teapot.

Dizzying, really.

edit: I edit often for clarity. Voice to text on my phone rarely gets it even close.... Sometimes I edit to run in the time allowed as I tend be verbose...I definitely edit (when I notice) for spelling errors, because little pissants LOVE to nit-pick spelling errors.. Sometimes, I add commas, or take them away, since I am overly fond of subordinate phrases (and parenthetical asides...) ...And run-on sentences with random capitalization.

I don't edit for split infinitives because I barely know what those are.

I do like your attribution of my deep, Machiavellian motives for my edits. As if people other than you put that kind of effort into a post that will not be remembered beyond the day.

In a way it is high praise, coming from a guy that stalked Munkey, created TWO alts to torment him with and then planted a post in one of the alts "outing himself to be Munkey." Takes a sick sort of genius and a LOT of spare time to put in that sort of effort.

Little tip: it's a bulletin board, not a contest. There is no prize and you can't "win" by finding the most "errors" in your imagined opponent's posts.

If you're going to bust on his writing, try to get yours right.

Speaking of editing...I went back and edited the word "hafe" to "have". An error so egregious that you got SO excited to find my "fuck-up' as you call it that you forgot the apostrophe in "your's". You might want to go edit that and then claim that I edited mine to try to make you look foolish and so on...

enjoy.

 

[norfolklad]

If you two could take a short break in your combat...

a nice word to describe a woman who enjoys sex is a..

woman​

Most woman, in my experience, enjoy sex and I, for one, am eternally grateful. Of course it would be nicer if they all, as opposed to some, would enjoy sex with me but then we can't have everything, can we? The rest I will simply dream about.

 

[unregistered]

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[unregistered]

 

[norfolklad]

Probably the best choice. I have a feeling that the OP was going for something along the lines of promiscuous, but the way the question is worded makes your answer the best one.

I'm relieved you think so, because I love fucking women and they seem to enjoy it. The longer they go on enjoying it, the happier I shall be.

 

[drinkz]

Hey NightL, whine much?

 

[Que]

If you two could take a short break in your combat...

a nice word to describe a woman who enjoys sex is a..

woman​

Most woman, in my experience, enjoy sex and I, for one, am eternally grateful. Of course it would be nicer if they all, as opposed to some, would enjoy sex with me but then we can't have everything, can we? The rest I will simply dream about.

I think you may have a point here...

I know that I was raised in an environment that certainly implied, if not explicitly stated that a desire for sexual activity resided exclusively with men.

That women in the throes of romance, might lower themselves in a moment of weakness to descend from their angelic state to engage in some tawdry sex if some man "talked them into it."

I was SHOCKED the first time I realized that a girl that wanted to engage in some (minor) sexual play with me did it for the fun of it, and that she actually was sadly NOT in love with me.

I realize that all of this is on some kind of a continuum, but the way I was socialized was completely backwards it seems.

Not that men don't often give in to their 'baser' urges perhaps any and every time that they have an opportunity that appears to them, it's just that I seem to see brokenhearted men wearing their hearts on their sleeves when cast aside by a callous partner JUST as often as the other way around. Maybe more so.

I think MOST healthy women are highly driven by their libidos. The idea that there is really any serious societal constraint on that doesn't seem to have any basis anymore...

The original poster does have a point that there is evidence of the vestiges of societal repression left over in our language or in this case a gap, but their isn't really any such thing as "the walk of shame" anymore. If a girl doesn't make it back to her home, and chooses to stay over at a friends, who really judges that anymore?

The only difference I see in men and women as regards to their libidos is that a man's is typically day-to-day constant (allowing for scheduling and stress)...A woman's typically waxes and wanes on a predictable basis depending on what her hormones are encouraging for the day.

 

[norfolklad]

I think you may have a point here...

I was lucky. I was initiated into the adventure of sex many years ago by a girl who had more experience than me - not much but enough, when added to her natural enthusiasm, to make a difference - for which I shall ever be grateful. She thoroughly enjoyed sex and she made sure that I did too. I'm sure that you won't want me to go into details.

I've enjoyed passing on the experience I gained from her to other women and making sure that they enjoy sex just as much. My life has been enormous fun and rewarding.

 

[Red_Kiss]

I think it's fair to say there are men that appreciate and celebrate a woman who is comfortable with her vibrant sexuality and there are men that simply can't appreciate it. Perhaps it's because they're intimidated or because they can't wrap their minds around the concept that women enjoy sex just as much as they do. I have found that these types of men can be hurtful; at the very least they don't allow for one to fully shine as a woman.
Needless to say I prefer the first type of man. And whether he wants to call me his beautiful slut or his goddess, either would make my heart sing.

 

[Que]

...we probably don't NEED a word.

Consider the handi-capable. Whatever their challenge may be, or how well they adapt, no one wants to be 'differently-abled'. No one hopes for that for their kids.

So, we in society keep inventing words like the above to convey our desire to be respectful. The problem is, each new word or phrase later becomes unacceptable as it becomes something used by the cruel in taunts.

Retarded was once a very gentle way of saying that like a distributor, they have a great spark it just arrived a little later. Actually a really apt descriptor when you think about it. Modern thought about 'mainstreaming' is the process of getting those great little sparks "caught up".

We HAVE a lot of words for lusty wenches. You just have to (gingerly) try them on like hats and see which one she hates.

Recently I sent a pm to a lovely girl that has been actively working to bringing the "bad girl" inside to the surface. I expressed my enthusiasm for her progress. We sent back and forth a time or two.

You know that delicious little anticipatory feeling one gets from flirtation that is maybe headed somewhere? Like that.

I over-shared in my inimitable way some of my own lusty thoughts from the perspective of the "dirty old man" that I have become and have become comfortable with being.

Her response was, "you had me, until 'slut'.."

She wasn't being overly picky on wording. That one just happens to squick her. It happens. You never know until you try it in context.

I've have many more instances where such salty language has been eagerly received.

Was I just throwing caution to the wind? Throwing the spaghetti on the wall hoping for 'al dente'?

Nope it was calculated thusly:

I have crushed on and gotten to know a pair of sisters. Both amazing women and anyone seeing my attempts would assume I was aiming high.

One, the blonde one, is a very friendly girl shall we say with a LOT of fun adventures in her past and for that matter present. She mentioned in passing once that she HATES that word. A lot. Her actual behavior from a strictly observational standpoint would probably invite that from some.

The other, the redhead, has always been fairly discrete. She WORRIES what others might think and in this small town comports herself accordingly. She has on specific occasions denied herself some fun to prevent such labeling. (We can all agree that such labeling in a non-affectionate setting is inappropriate) She has shared with me that she LOVES such words used in the bedroom.

My (usually accurate) assumption is that good girls like to be treated and talked about in a saucy manner, and girls that are the subject of jealous, mean barbs, tend to like a more romantic, gentle use of language.

So in short- if I call you a slut, it's because you are far from one.

 

[Que]

I think it's fair to say there are men that appreciate and celebrate a woman who is comfortable with her vibrant sexuality and there are men that simply can't appreciate it. Perhaps it's because they're intimidated or because they can't wrap their minds around the concept that women enjoy sex just as much as they do. I have found that these types of men can be hurtful; at the very least they don't allow for one to fully shine as a woman.
Needless to say I prefer the first type of man. And whether he wants to call me his beautiful slut or his goddess, either would make my heart sing.

Succinct and perfect.

I'm stealing "vibrant sexuality."

 

[Red_Kiss]

Succinct and perfect.

I'm stealing "vibrant sexuality."

Thank you. 'Glowing with erotic energy' is a good description, too.