A Place 🤍 for The Girl Next Door ☕️🌷

Ahh thats true , the mic's shit quality on the web version lol , if it was just chatting , then web version does the job~
I have found that Signal is also a great chat and webcam app, but it requires a phone number, Discord requires an email address. So the functionality of the two apps is very similar, it just kind of comes down to what personal information people are comfortable sharing with the app.
 
Discord does have spam detection , if you try and add too many friends very quickly , it will ask for your phone number to verify you are real and not a bot lol
I'm still learning that app. I installed it specifically to chat with one woman. I wouldn't even know how to find new "friends" on the app, does it have chat groups or anything to join?
 
https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdGRpcXN4bWpzcmc3ejl6aTFqYjljbmJidW1ybzRnaTZudWkyaWNwNyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/l3V0BVDTyuMzwpS1i/giphy.gif

:) I'm still not sold on Discord or Signal, but that's probably because I'm not a fan of change.

I've downloaded both and we'll see what sticks!
I think I’m pretty adaptable and can roll with change, but with a large caveat. It has to be beneficial, whether that’s an improved experience, more economical, etc.

This is the frustrating kind where there’s no choice other than to change and the replacements all seem like a downgrade and require effort.

Ok, I’ll go scream at the neighborhood kids to get off my lawn now 😂
 
Aww, thanks! It's nice to end the week on a compliment :kiss:
i wish you were The Girl Next Door!Why?Well it,s difficult to explain without knowing you in real life but after reading your comments and looking at your profile i think&believe you,re a nice &respectfull&honest and in private a very sexy kinky Girl Next Door!i,m from Antwerp,Belgium and if you want to PM or sharing our naughty things with each other i,ll be honoured ,even so i,m not so experienced with chatting etc but i,ll do my best,that,s a promise(and if you like to do it,take the lead & control ,that certainly would be a good start):rose::heart:
 
Well....boo (n) Apparently the photo police have struck.

I'm not sure where this thread (and my others) will go (...because who the hell wants to click on every link :rolleyes:), but I guess we will see.
Personally, I would just like to thank Literotica for hiding all THIS UTTER FILTH behind links.

Can you imagine my embarrassment if I were peacefully reading a Lit story about non-consensual incest in a public place where everyone could see my screen, and UTTER FILTH LIKE THIS popped up on my tablet?

The horror! The horror!
 
Personally, I would just like to thank Literotica for hiding all THIS UTTER FILTH behind links.

Can you imagine my embarrassment if I were peacefully reading a Lit story about non-consensual incest in a public place where everyone could see my screen, and UTTER FILTH LIKE THIS popped up on my tablet?

The horror! The horror!
I’m clearly out of the loop…Is that the issue here? I kind of assumed it had to do with some states (including my own) requiring an ID check before looking at sites like pornhub….and that likely wasn’t something Lit wanted to tackle. But concern over a nosy Karen seeing your smut - FFS 🙄
 
I’m clearly out of the loop…Is that the issue here? I kind of assumed it had to do with some states (including my own) requiring an ID check before looking at sites like pornhub….and that likely wasn’t something Lit wanted to tackle. But concern over a nosy Karen seeing your smut - FFS 🙄
"Many Literotica readers (and authors) shared with us that they visit the site on their phones and would prefer not to have NSFWs images on the screen while someone else is looking over their shoulder. Other members told us there are so many sites on the internet with photos and videos that they would prefer Literotica remain a haven for text - the original intent when the site was launched more than a quarter century ago."

That's the official explanation from Manu. No one on Lit seems to be taking it seriously, and there is a whole 20 page thread where Litsters have said so.

Your explanation makes far more sense, and the consensus seems to be that it's the main reason for the change. Plus, images take up lots of server space, and there are issues around copyright and consent ("pics of my wife" crap).

It doesn't really affect or bother me. I just can't see a good reason why Admin weren't open about the real issue. So I hope you don't mind me poking gentle fun at it here - and in the spirit of Lit's literary pretensions bolting an unnecessary Conrad quote on the end.
 
"Many Literotica readers (and authors) shared with us that they visit the site on their phones and would prefer not to have NSFWs images on the screen while someone else is looking over their shoulder. Other members told us there are so many sites on the internet with photos and videos that they would prefer Literotica remain a haven for text - the original intent when the site was launched more than a quarter century ago."

That's the official explanation from Manu. No one on Lit seems to be taking it seriously, and there is a whole 20 page thread where Litsters have said so.

Your explanation makes far more sense, and the consensus seems to be that it's the main reason for the change. Plus, images take up lots of server space, and there are issues around copyright and consent ("pics of my wife" crap).

It doesn't really affect or bother me. I just can't see a good reason why Admin weren't open about the real issue. So I hope you don't mind me poking gentle fun at it here - and in the spirit of Lit's literary pretensions bolting an unnecessary Conrad quote on the end.
Gentle poking is never a bother :)

Funny though that if you go scroll to the site index on the Lit homepage there is a brightly colored (and some might say attention grabbing) ad for Lit Live Nude Webcams... Seems that preserving the "original intent" is subjective.
 
Back
Top