A quick apology to AH

Me personally? Of course not. To the contrary: everyone on this forum deserves to know that the person they’re interacting with is the same person they have interacted with before, which is why it behooved anyone who changes their identity to signal they’re doing that.
No one deserves anything.

On this forum, the two easy ways to do it is (1) to put a note in your signature; and/or (2) announce it somewhere visible, like in a new topic, as your first contribution to the forum under a new identity.

OP has done neither of these things, which is dishonest and deceptive.
You do not make the rules for how people operate their accounts. No one is required to operate by your rules, or to feel bad for not doing things the way you think they should.

Congratulations on making this thread about you.
 
Congratulations on making this thread about you.
I don't think he is. The objection he's raising is legitimate. The forums have been flooded with sock puppets for as long as I've been here, we've had numerous discussion here about 1-bombing (which implies alt accounts). He's not wrong to be suspicious.

In this case, he has my email so he could have handled it quietly, but let's take a moment to reflect on the fact that both EmilyMiller and lovecraft68 have agreed on something.
 
I don't think he is. The objection he's raising is legitimate. The forums have been flooded with sock puppets for as long as I've been here, we've had numerous discussion here about 1-bombing (which implies alt accounts). He's not wrong to be suspicious.

In this case, he has my email so he could have handled it quietly, but let's take a moment to reflect on the fact that both EmilyMiller and lovecraft68 have agreed on something.
I thought that was a flying pig I saw earlier; now I'm sure.
Hello again!
 
I believe it was you that I had this conversation with ... but the fictional punk band "Bag of Weasels" made it into a story that I'm planning to publish later this year.
Yeah, that was me. I bet they have some great merch.
 
And the crap that people obsess about here is truly bizarre. It’s lovely to have a lovely person and a talented writer back. Who the fuck cares about anything else?

Policing other people when you have zero standing to do so is a hobby for many here.
 
Congratulations on making this thread about you.
Yes, it was truly a delight to land on the receiving end on that small pile-on. But hey, no hard feelings; at least I managed to accomplish a feat which I didn't consider to be even remotely possible — namely that:
both EmilyMiller and lovecraft68 have agreed on something.

Anyway, since OP has obliquely (and rightfully) suggested to me that I should remember to check my dedicated Literotica email more often than once a month, I'll try to mend that error of mine and bow out of this thread.
 
I don't think he is. The objection he's raising is legitimate. The forums have been flooded with sock puppets for as long as I've been here, we've had numerous discussion here about 1-bombing (which implies alt accounts). He's not wrong to be suspicious.

In this case, he has my email so he could have handled it quietly, but let's take a moment to reflect on the fact that both EmilyMiller and lovecraft68 have agreed on something.
Welcome back. I don't expect you to remember me, but I remember your Korean poetry and loved it, even if it does go well over my head- on a technical level. Hope you're doing well and hoping there will be more Korean verse.
 
Welcome back again, but also congratulations for triggering one of the more bizarre exchanges I’ve seen at the bazaar. 😎 Glad that’s sorted out though.

The mention of sock puppets reminds me that decades ago, I created a sock puppet with some friends on a particular listserv, gave her a back story and some (relatively civilised) rules of behaviour, and let her loose. The trick was that we didn’t know who had their hand in the sock at any one time, so to speak, although two hands in the sock was even more interesting. We thought that we were being so clever at the time, but the joke was on us: rather than being an instrument of evil, the sock puppet turned out to just be our creative commons.

She’s still around, being perfectly respectable as the outward identity of a member of the group - the sock puppet did a merge with a real person.
 
Welcome back again, but also congratulations for triggering one of the more bizarre exchanges I’ve seen at the bazaar. 😎 Glad that’s sorted out though.

The mention of sock puppets reminds me that decades ago, I created a sock puppet with some friends on a particular listserv, gave her a back story and some (relatively civilised) rules of behaviour, and let her loose. The trick was that we didn’t know who had their hand in the sock at any one time, so to speak, although two hands in the sock was even more interesting. We thought that we were being so clever at the time, but the joke was on us: rather than being an instrument of evil, the sock puppet turned out to just be our creative commons.

She’s still around, being perfectly respectable as the outward identity of a member of the group - the sock puppet did a merge with a real person.
It’s the same as conspiracy theories, people get validation by claiming privileged info. “I, and my other true believers, alone understand the true nature of X, the rest of you are just blind sheeple!”

This narrative self-delusion appeals to a certain type of mind, I guess.
 
Back
Top