A Real Woman Speaks

We aren't talking about sexuality, we're talking about biological reality.

Women don't have penises......that's "war is peace!!" level leftoid stupidity and usefull idiots lapping it up.
^^^ Proof positive MAGATs are allergic to science.
 
Once again you try to normalize abnormal behavior. Using one case is an attempt by you to diminish the validity of many other cases argued before Congressional sub committees. Title IX states educational institutions limit women participation in women sports for those who are biologically female. US Olympic officials ban transgender women from women events. This issue is about competitive fairness.

Trans women (biological males) entering women's locker rooms, showers or bathrooms is an infringement on women's privacy and in some cases their safety..
What is normal behavior? Who defines it? Many people who post here think Maga is abnormal behavior.

Unlike the OP and you, who see things in absolutes, I see life full of shades of gray. Very few things are right or wrong.
I don't know enough about the science of trans athletes to have an educated opinion but I'm open to the possibility that people born with a penis have an advantage. Maybe trans athletes should have their own events.
 
What is normal behavior? Who defines it? Many people who post here think Maga is abnormal behavior.

What is abnormal about not hating your own people, nation and community??

Maybe trans athletes should have their own events.
That isn't the point.....the point is to destroy normal events and demoralize normal people who haven't bought into the "war is peace" level of delusion that some women are born with penises.
 
What is abnormal about not hating your own people, nation and community??


That isn't the point.....the point is to destroy normal events and demoralize normal people who haven't bought into the "war is peace" level of delusion that some women are born with penises.
Is it your position that maga doesn't hate?

Are you aware of
In Humans (Intersex)

  • Terminology: The term "hermaphrodite" is considered inaccurate and stigmatizing for humans; intersex is the preferred term for people born with sex characteristics that don't fit typical binary definitions.
 
Looks to me like you're the one who sees them as one and the same.

Newsflash dudly, most of the world understands that what you promote isn't real or truthful. You can lie to us, you can even lie to yourself, but you cannot (and will not) defeat the understanding that men and women aren't exactly the same except for the clothes and makeup they wear.

You, thinking they are, is a mental illness.
 
Once again you try to normalize abnormal behavior. Using one case is an attempt by you to diminish the validity of many other cases argued before Congressional sub committees. Title IX states educational institutions limit women participation in women sports for those who are biologically female. US Olympic officials ban transgender women from women events. This issue is about competitive fairness.

Trans women (biological males) entering women's locker rooms, showers or bathrooms is an infringement on women's privacy and in some cases their safety..

Essentially he's arguing that the 5th place male finisher didn't take a woman's spot merely because the man didn't win.

Which is about as stupid as it gets when you consider it from the 6th place finisher's POV.
 
Is it your position that maga doesn't hate?

No, it is that they don't hate America or white ( or white enough) people or men.

Are you aware of
In Humans (Intersex)

  • Terminology: The term "hermaphrodite" is considered inaccurate and stigmatizing for humans; intersex is the preferred term for people born with sex characteristics that don't fit typical binary definitions.

Yea. Pointing out that a handful of people have been born with tails or 11 fingers doesn't change the fact that people who say "humans don't have tails" or "humans have ten fingers" aren't wrong. A microscopic number of birth defects isn't what's causing a societal level social conflict.

We're talking about XY with a beard and a god damn cock n' ballz putting a dress on and (D)umb fuck democrats actaully beliving that makes them a woman and totally above the law and can do whatever the fuck they want and anyone who questions that is a TRANSPHOBIC NAZI BIGOT RACIST!!!! The batshit activist around the Transfascist movement that just CAN'T behave in a reasonable sane manner....are the problem, not people with birth defects.
 
No, it is that they don't hate America or white ( or white enough) people or men.



Yea. Pointing out that a handful of people have been born with tails or 11 fingers doesn't change the fact that people who say "humans don't have tails" or "humans have ten fingers" aren't wrong. A microscopic number of birth defects isn't what's causing a societal level social conflict.

We're talking about XY with a beard and a god damn cock n' ballz putting a dress on and (D)umb fuck democrats actaully beliving that makes them a woman and totally above the law and can do whatever the fuck they want and anyone who questions that is a TRANSPHOBIC NAZI BIGOT RACIST!!!! The batshit activist around the Transfascist movement that just CAN'T behave in a reasonable sane manner....are the problem, not people with birth defects.
You sound upset
 
You sound upset

This is text, what you're hearing is in your own mind and is likely a projection of your own emotional state.

Which would track with the "WOMEN CAN HAVE DICKS!!!" hysteria that the woketar(D)s have gotten totally drunk on.
 
This is text, what you're hearing is in your own mind and is likely a projection of your own emotional state.

Which would track with the "WOMEN CAN HAVE DICKS!!!" hysteria that the woketar(D)s have gotten totally drunk on.
I think you're upset because you're suppressing your desire to be intimate with a chick with a dick
 
This is text, what you're hearing is in your own mind and is likely a projection of your own emotional state.

Which would track with the "WOMEN CAN HAVE DICKS!!!" hysteria that the woketar(D)s have gotten totally drunk on.
His whole world exists in his head.
 
Science says females don't have dicks......bat shit leftist ideologues say otherwise.
Science says some people are born with a psychological gender not the same as their anatomical sex. Casual observation says the same.
 
Science says females don't have dicks......bat shit leftist ideologues say otherwise.
Oh, i get your stance which is biological sex is penis=male, vagina=female, period, full stop. Which is fine if you're only looking at physical markers. But science is saying thats not all there is to it and it’s complicated. But since y’all MAGATs are science deniers you get stuck at the penis=male, vagina=female level.
 
Real woman speak on a frequency that is foreign to the MAGAt contingency.
 
Once again you try to normalize abnormal behavior. Using one case is an attempt by you to diminish the validity of many other cases argued before Congressional sub committees.
The cases you're referring to are no less anecdotal than the one I used. Also, I note that you say "many other cases", but there literally are only a few documented cases to begin with.
Title IX states educational institutions limit women participation in women sports for those who are biologically female.
Overlooking the fact that your side of the aisle was staunchly opposed to Title IX when it was passed, that's not true. While Title IX is mostly known today for pertaining to collegiate athletics, it's really about sex-based discrimination in education (including but not limited to athletics). The key words are: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance..."

So you're effectively hanging your hat on "on the basis of sex", where it doesn't say anything about gender identity or gender assignment at birth (a lot less was known about both in 1972). Which is in direct contradiction to your usual strict-constructionist approach. Either way, though, it doesn't say "biological sex" or any reasonable variation thereof.

US Olympic officials ban transgender women from women events.
That's neither here nor there with respect to any setting outside the Olympics.
This issue is about competitive fairness.
No, it's about bigotry and ignorance and fear. If your concerns really were true, then every single trans-female athlete in the NCAA would routinely take first place in every event. That simply has not happened.
Trans women (biological males) entering women's locker rooms, showers or bathrooms is an infringement on women's privacy and in some cases their safety..
This would carry a lot more weight if you weren't a full-throated supporter of a politician who bragged about walking in on teenage girls in the Miss Teen USA dressing room. But that's beside the point. The truth is, nearly all transwomen are there for the same reason cis-women are. Perverts exist, of course, but I sincerely doubt any of them are going to go through the extremely long and difficult process of gender transition just to see other women undress.

Also, show me someone who thinks locker rooms are sexy and I'll show you someone who's never been in a locker room!
 
The cases you're referring to are no less anecdotal than the one I used. Also, I note that you say "many other cases", but there literally are only a few documented cases to begin with.

Overlooking the fact that your side of the aisle was staunchly opposed to Title IX when it was passed, that's not true. While Title IX is mostly known today for pertaining to collegiate athletics, it's really about sex-based discrimination in education (including but not limited to athletics). The key words are: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance..."

So you're effectively hanging your hat on "on the basis of sex", where it doesn't say anything about gender identity or gender assignment at birth (a lot less was known about both in 1972). Which is in direct contradiction to your usual strict-constructionist approach. Either way, though, it doesn't say "biological sex" or any reasonable variation thereof.


That's neither here nor there with respect to any setting outside the Olympics.

No, it's about bigotry and ignorance and fear. If your concerns really were true, then every single trans-female athlete in the NCAA would routinely take first place in every event. That simply has not happened.

This would carry a lot more weight if you weren't a full-throated supporter of a politician who bragged about walking in on teenage girls in the Miss Teen USA dressing room. But that's beside the point. The truth is, nearly all transwomen are there for the same reason cis-women are. Perverts exist, of course, but I sincerely doubt any of them are going to go through the extremely long and difficult process of gender transition just to see other women undress.

Also, show me someone who thinks locker rooms are sexy and I'll show you someone who's never been in a locker room!

*Reported*:

YD895 just publicly humiliated ineedhelp1.

😳

🤣
 
Back
Top