A Real Woman Speaks

What is abnormal about not hating your own people, nation and community??


That isn't the point.....the point is to destroy normal events and demoralize normal people who haven't bought into the "war is peace" level of delusion that some women are born with penises.
The alleged destruction of "normal events" and the "demoralization of normal people," is in your head and the heads of those who allow themselves to be bothered by someone who doesn't fit their opinion of normal. You choose to be bothered.
 
Leftist bullshit is not science.
Psychology is not leftist bullshit. It has not been at any time since Freud. It was not leftist bullshit to remove homosexuality as a mental illness from the DSMV, and this is no different.
 
Is it your position that maga doesn't hate?

Are you aware of
In Humans (Intersex)

  • Terminology: The term "hermaphrodite" is considered inaccurate and stigmatizing for humans; intersex is the preferred term for people born with sex characteristics that don't fit typical binary definitions.

also known as futanari
 
I am aware of futanari and that there is a fetish involving people born with male and female genitalia. I was referring to the small percentage of the population of people for whom that is reality.
 
We do, and we're winning because of it.
The RW has no chance at all of winning the culture war. In a few years, all arguments against LGBTQ rights -- even all arguments against abortion -- will seem as silly and dated as the Curse of Ham.
 
Thanks for proving my point about y’all MAGATs being science deniers.
We aren't science deniers......your bullshit that women can have dicks, isn't science it's political bullshittery.

You're just too stupid to know the difference.
 
The alleged destruction of "normal events" and the "demoralization of normal people," is in your head and the heads of those who allow themselves to be bothered by someone who doesn't fit their opinion of normal. You choose to be bothered.

The government trying to tell me how to talk, punishing me for offending some Karen tranny or their "ally" with blue hair and a nose ring?? Isn't in my head or my choice....

The Government taking my shit because some rainbow faggot feels entitled to my labor/property?? Insn't in my head or my choice.

Unlike you choosing to support these Karencrat race socialist....modern western nazis, that is a choice and you made it.
 
Thanks for proving my point about y’all MAGATs being science deniers.
We aren't science deniers......your bullshit that women can have dicks, isn't science it's political bullshittery.

You're just too stupid to know the difference.

You laugh, because you know it's true. "Women can totally have dicks!!" LMFAO!!! and you fucking retards actually bought that as "Science" :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: I got a bridge to sell you pal......real cheap, just 9,999 dollars!!!
 
We aren't science deniers......your bullshit that women can have dicks, isn't science it's political bullshittery.

You're just too stupid to know the difference.
See? Stuck at level one. Like I said, epigenetics is sorting things out. But continue to feel free to ignore science, it’s what you MAGATs do on purpose. Well, not just ignore but actively halt.
 
You laugh, because you know it's true. "Women can totally have dicks!!" LMFAO!!! and you fucking retards actually bought that as "Science" :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: I got a bridge to sell you pal......real cheap, just 9,999 dollars!!!
I’m laughing at you denying you’re not science deniers.
 
I’m laughing at you denying you’re not science deniers.

I'm an actual scientist laughing at you for thinking political propaganda is "science". :ROFLMAO:

I bet you believe every word of Dr.Fauci...I mean Dr.THESCIENCE! said too right? Because nobody with a graduate degree could EVER be bought by political interests!!! Scientists are totally above that!! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Do you also believe in "unbiased" news media?? It's actually more believable than the bullshit you peddle as "science".
 
See...stuck at obvious propaganda. Tell us more how women have dicks and testicles. :ROFLMAO: (y)
Take an honest look into epigenetics on the subject. Homosexuality and transgender are not mental illnesses.
 
I'm an actual scientist laughing at you for thinking political propaganda is "science". :ROFLMAO:
IIRC, you have some education in botany. If so, you of all people should understand something about genetics. Hint: physical and brain development during pregnancy.
 
Take an honest look into epigenetics on the subject. Homosexuality and transgender are not mental illnesses.

As genetics has been a focus of my study I understand how it's being used as a 'reason' to explain how gender dysphoria is actaully TOTALLY NORMAL!!! LOL....bullshit.

Homosexuality no, but gender dysphoria, just like all other dysphorias is. It's a literal delusion in direct opposition to actual observable reality.

A bunch of lefties saying "Das MEAN we need to make this less mean sounding by bullshitting about "science" to normalize it!!" doesn't make it less of a delusion.

IIRC, you have some education in botany. If so, you of all people should understand something about genetics. Hint: physical and brain development during pregnancy.

I know a fair bit about genetics.

Nothing about genetics or development during pregnancy somehow makes an XY male born with a DICK AND BALLS a fuckin' female.
 
As genetics has been a focus of my study I understand how it's being used as a 'reason' to explain how gender dysphoria is actaully TOTALLY NORMAL!!! LOL....bullshit.

Homosexuality no, but gender dysphoria, just like all other dysphorias is. It's a literal delusion in direct opposition to actual observable reality.

A bunch of lefties saying "Das MEAN we need to make this less mean sounding by bullshitting about "science" to normalize it!!" doesn't make it less of a delusion.



I know a fair bit about genetics.

Nothing about genetics or development during pregnancy somehow makes an XY male born with a DICK AND BALLS a fuckin' female.
So what you’re saying is that as a “scientist” who knows a fair bit about genetics you’re picking and choosing what science to believe, lol. Not only that, you’re clinging onto level one as if your worldview depended on it.

I’m on the road until late afternoon so I’ll check back later.
 
So what you’re saying is that as a “scientist” who knows a fair bit about genetics you’re picking and choosing what science to believe, lol.

Not all science is equal or as pure as you seem to think it is.

When "science" is totally irrational and or suddenly starts making wild claims that line up far more with political and or economic interest than observable reality??? I absolutely question that. The more corporate interest and packs of politicians I see celebrating "science" and pimping it for their own self interest? The more skeptical I get about the validity of that "science".

I encourage other independent thinking individuals to also treat "science" that's trying to "science" you for a vote or money to take a damn good look at that "science" and really ask themselves if the political and or corporate interest behind it would ever lie to you?? ;) Big Tobacco, oil, pharma....they've NEVER used "science" to benefit themselves right??? Politicians either...they'd NEVER lie. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:



Not only that, you’re clinging onto level one as if your worldview depended on it.

Sure, "level one"....whatever the fuck that means.


I’m on the road until late afternoon so I’ll check back later.

Travel safe.
 
Last edited:
Looking at photos of naked men, under your bedclothes by torchlight so your mum doesn't catch you (again), cannot be classed as 'studying'.

Correct.... 'british asian'.... :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

Good thing I was studying biology, I could have wound up a fag....:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:(y):ROFLMAO:
 










The cases you're referring to are no less anecdotal than the one I used. Also, I note that you say "many other cases", but there literally are only a few documented cases to begin with.
You're either uninformed or just not interested in the facts. To re-research all the available cases to prove a point is a monumental task. It's unfortunate that todays feminist have sacrificed 50 years of gains in women's sports surrendering women's equality in sports at the alter of wokeness disguised as equity for males choosing to identify as female. It's like believing covering oneself with a dress can actually change science (biological reality). Sexual genetic makeup is not transitory.
Overlooking the fact that your side of the aisle was staunchly opposed to Title IX when it was passed, that's not true. While Title IX is mostly known today for pertaining to collegiate athletics, it's really about sex-based discrimination in education (including but not limited to athletics).
My personal side is in defense of biological females being protected from males disguised as females. It doesn't surprise me that once again you muddy the discussion by playing the role of Mr. Peabody and the wayback machine, steering our conversation back into the 70s. Many issues have changed since the original introduction of title IX. Let's platform the discussion around 2020 and current issues.

I value the input from the likes of Nancy Mace and Riley Gaines and real world experiences.
The key words are: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance..."
I agree with all of the above however lacking from that statement is the trans movement and the science.

On the basis of sex! Biology/science over gender preference is being overlooked. Science is not discriminatory. Abnormality should not be accepted as normal whether it be in women's bathrooms, locker rooms or sports or by placing transgender women in female prisons where violence and rape of female prisoners is rampant.

Caitlyn Jenner who is an expert on the subject matter supports a ban on trans women in women sports. If you're interested in comments from Riley Gaines, Nancy Mace or Caitlyn Jenner then feel free to look it up yourself.
So you're effectively hanging your hat on "on the basis of sex", where it doesn't say anything about gender identity or gender assignment at birth (a lot less was known about both in 1972).

Exactly!! That's my point. Transgenderism wasn't an issue back in 1972.

E/O 14168 clarifies the science and directs policy markers to adhere to defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government. I'm sure some activist judge will rule on sections of E/O 14168
Which is in direct contradiction to your usual strict-constructionist approach. Either way, though, it doesn't say "biological sex" or any reasonable variation thereof.
E/O 14168 is very specific.
That's neither here nor there with respect to any setting outside the Olympics.
There are reasonable trends taking place in many sports arenas
No, it's about bigotry and ignorance and fear. If your concerns really were true, then every single trans-female athlete in the NCAA would routinely take first place in every event. That simply has not happened.
It's about fairness. It's not about bigotry or ignorance. Refer to Caitlyn Gender. It's about protecting women from injury.

There is an NCAA policy change that allows trans folks to practice with women but limits women competition to strictly biological women.
This would carry a lot more weight if you weren't a full-throated supporter of a politician who bragged about walking in on teenage girls in the Miss Teen USA dressing room.
Non sequitur. The formal complaints come from real women and should be accepted on the validity of the source not some TDS laden opinion.
But that's beside the point. The truth is, nearly all transwomen are there for the same reason cis-women are. Perverts exist, of course, but I sincerely doubt any of them are going to go through the extremely long and difficult process of gender transition just to see other women undress.
I have a close friend who transitioned. His transitioning has not changed our friendship. He was tormented by his situation and we discussed his dilemma. I'm actually proud of his courage to make his/her decision which allowed him peace within himself. That being said there would be absolutely no way any of my daughters could beat him in any sport. I don't have a beef with Trans women but I do have concerns with violent activist that insist on shoving their lifestyle down your throat

Perhaps start leagues that cater to trans women.
Also, show me someone who thinks locker rooms are sexy and I'll show you someone who's never been in a locker room!
There are perverts out there.

Ya can't help yourself can you? TDS
 
Back
Top