Adverb Rules

Candy_Kane54

Missing my Muse...
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Posts
13,537
The general rule for adverbs is that they precede a simple verb, although it isn't as rigid as for adjectives.

E.g., "Steve warmly greeted me."

Greeted is a simple verb so, by rule, the adverb 'warmly' should precede the verb 'greeted.'

Yet, Grammarly wanted me to change the above sentence to: "Steve greeted me warmly."

Now it is a given that not all adverbs are equal so is 'warmly' a type of adverb that doesn't follow the general rule?
 
I've never heard of such a rule. My gut instinct would be to put the adverb last in this sentence, and only if you swapped the name for a pronoun that it would sound right to put the adverb before the verb.

So, as far as I can see, Grammarly is absolutely correct here.

(Also, cue the obligatory "You shouldn't be using adverbs at all!").
 
I could see the adverb coming before the verb if it was the first part of a compound sentence where the following section made reference to that modification, e.g.: Steve warmly greeted me, which was reassuring given his polite acknowledgment of the other candidates.
 
I think the best "rule" for adverbs is that they should be placed where their meaning is clearest, with a secondary consideration for how the sentence sounds.

In this case, I think both versions are equally clear, because there is no doubt that "warmly" modifies "greeted" whether you put it before "greeted" or after "me."

I personally prefer "Steve greeted me warmly." "Warmly" in this case is the key point that the sentence means to convey, so it makes sense to conclude the sentence with it.
 
Either is grammatically correct. Grammarly, like most LLMs, is giving you the most common usage as if it was an actual standard.
 
The general rule for adverbs is that they precede a simple verb, although it isn't as rigid as for adjectives.

E.g., "Steve warmly greeted me."

Greeted is a simple verb so, by rule, the adverb 'warmly' should precede the verb 'greeted.'

Yet, Grammarly wanted me to change the above sentence to: "Steve greeted me warmly."

Now it is a given that not all adverbs are equal so is 'warmly' a type of adverb that doesn't follow the general rule?
According to Gemini, there is no such rule. There is a rule that an adverb should not be placed between the verb and its object. "He ran quickly home" is a bad construct. Otherwise, English is very flexible about adverb placement, and you can use adverb placement to create subtle differences in meaning.

Personally, I often avoid the case where I say how something is done before I say what "something" is. That's the case that @Areala-chan pointed out.
 
The general rule for adverbs is that they precede a simple verb
Whew! At least you didn't split an infinitive. ("To boldly go where no man has gone before..." brought the grammar police and pedants out of the woodwork with a vengeance at one time.)

I'd say whatever sounds the most natural (read it back to yourself out loud) is the way to go, which is usually a matter of context. General rules have exceptions, er, generally.
 
No, it's a reason why you shouldn't be using Grammarly, or anything else that wants to make unwarranted changes. This is why it has such a bad reputation.

Either is grammatically correct. Grammarly, like most LLMs, is giving you the most common usage as if it was an actual standard.

I don't worry about adverbs. I use an ad blocker.
I wouldn't know an adverb from an Abe Vigoda, but yeah ^^^^^
 
I'd say it: "greeted me warmly."

Being a non-native English speaker, I first followed all the proper rules and listened to MS Word anytime it told me to do something.

But I realized that such tools are often too rigid, and they aren't always right. That's true even for Grammarly, and much more so for MS Word, which is far more restrictive. As with every other tool, use reason and common sense. I myself often play it by ear. It could be a musician's thing. 🫤
 
Last edited:
The general rule for adverbs is that they precede a simple verb, although it isn't as rigid as for adjectives.
I know a lot of obscure rules of English grammar - for instance that "due to" should only be used in combination with the verb "to be - but I've never heard of this.

It's also worth remembering that in the 19th century some stuffy people tried to impose rules on English like there were in Latin, without understanding that English doesn't work that way. It's the same as Renaissance poets trying to squeeze English into rhyme and metre because it worked in Italian.
 
I keep reading the thread title as "Adverbs rule."

Anyone want to pick that ball up?

Obviously, I don't.

When adverbs rule, they do so imperiously, provocatively, unreasonably.

The adverb obtrusively inserted itself into the otherwise marginally acceptable sentence.

The other parts of speech calmly told it to butt out, but the adverb defiantly refused and obnoxiously continued its really, very, and hopelessly extremely intrusive ways.
 
Back
Top