All Charges Dropped ~ Witch Hunt Over

[HisArpy]

How exciting for you. Smith is not liable for doing his job as instructed.

The right will likely bring more political theater to appease dipshits. That's what they do.

The Fla case was dismissed because the judge ruled he didn't have the authority in the first place to bring the prosecution against Trump.

No authority = malicious prosecution.

 

[HisArpy]

So Trump didn’t take classified documents back to Florida?

Yawn.

You've got to be the lamest asshole on Lit.

 

[HisArpy]

HOT!!!!

I suggest some iced tea. We're going to be here awhile and you'll probably get thirsty too.

 

[Nicefella]

Nonetheless, his tail is between his legs.

He got outmanouvered over and over.

Plus, Garland waited way too long to get things started.

Trump has been the King of the Weasels for a long time.

I’m going to say that Garland’s delay was strategic. He is far too bright to be farting around on this.

 

[ll74]

The Fla case was dismissed because the judge ruled he didn't have the authority in the first place to bring the prosecution against Trump.

That wasn't clear until SCOTUS ruled.

The DoJ made him special counsel.

No authority = malicious prosecution.

The authority was granted by DoJ. Smith isn't liable. If anyone would be liable, it would be the DoJ.

But keep trying.

And yes....the Republicans will try (and fail) to go after Garland. Feel free to masturbate as much as you want during the show

 

[Lazaran]

So, all this has proven is that Trump is basically above and untouchable by the law, will not be presecuted for the very well documented crimes he has committed. But is free to turn around and prosecute his opponents for undocumented crimes they have NOT committed.

And yet, you people accuse the Democrats of "Lawfare" basically so your chosen dictator can do exactly this.
Only difference is, Trump actually committed crimes.
But in a dictatorship the laws of the land do not apply to the leaders. This is the way you wanted it, right?

Take heart, Pax.

The saving grace is that there isn’t a prosecutor in the country that would try to bring any of the frivolous and fraudulent cases DonOld would want to bring against any of his “enemies”.

I actually believe DonOld knows damn well that all his accusations against his “enemies” are bullshit, and were nothing more than campaign fodder for the MAGAts to chew on.

Remember: “Lock her up”???

 

[Politruk]

If it were me, the lawfare would be just beginning, not ending.

It never will be. You do not have the brains to earn a law degree.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yawn.

You've got to be the lamest asshole on Lit.

It must suck to know that the lamest asshole on Lit watch you paint yourself into a corner.

 

[AceDesSpades]

“The (Justice) Department’s position is that the Constitution requires that this case be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated,”

Smith wrote of the election subversion case in a six-page filing with US District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.

“This outcome is not based on the merits or strength of the case against the defendant.”

Oh hell.
I though that you were talking about you
and that you have paid the father a "dowry" for her silence...

 

[HisArpy]

That wasn't clear until SCOTUS ruled.

The DoJ made him special counsel.


The authority was granted by DoJ. Smith isn't liable. If anyone would be liable, it would be the DoJ.

But keep trying.

And yes....the Republicans will try (and fail) to go after Garland. Feel free to masturbate as much as you want during the show

I can hear the defense now;

But, but, Your HONOR!! It wasn't MY client, it was Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray who FORCED him to persecute Mr. Trump!!


Unfortunately for you, because he wasn't lawfully appointed, any act by Smith was an act of a private individual. His "belief" that he had been granted some sort of official status doesn't convey immunity. Immunity would only attach if he was ACTUALLY legally appointed.

 

[HisArpy]

It must suck to know that the lamest asshole on Lit watch you paint yourself into a corner.

^proof that even your pudding sucks.

 

[ll74]

I can hear the defense now;

Neat.

But, but, Your HONOR!! It wasn't MY client, it was Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray who FORCED him to persecute Mr. Trump!!

He investigated, convened a grand jury and indicted.

Proving this was personal will be fun to watch.

Unfortunately for you, because he wasn't lawfully appointed, any act by Smith was an act of a private individual. His "belief" that he had been granted some sort of official status doesn't convey immunity. Immunity would only attach if he was ACTUALLY legally appointed.

He did what he was tasked to do. He did not act outside the lawas the DoJ instructed.

Good luck on your expectations. It will be more political theater without any actual action.......I know you enjoy that.

 

[HisArpy]

Neat.


He investigated, convened a grand jury and indicted.

No authority to do so. The fact that he did it anyway only adds to the damages.

Proving this was personal will be fun to watch.


He did what he was tasked to do. He did not act outside the lawas the DoJ instructed.

Good luck on your expectations. It will be more political theater without any actual action.......I know you enjoy that.

You're stuck on the fact that because he thought he was a member of the posse, he's golden.

Unfortunately, that's not how it works. You probably even know that's not how it works, but you're never going to admit it. OTOH, most people know that when you're impersonating a peace officer, you're still not a cop no matter how much you think you are.

 

[AceDesSpades]

He needs someone to fight back and he'll happily be wrong to do it.

 

[ll74]

No authority to do so. The fact that he did it anyway only adds to the damages.

He was acting on the authority of the DoJ. What sort of that are you avoiding?

You're stuck on the fact that because he thought he was a member of the posse, he's golden.

He had no expectation that his authority wasn't valid. Especially since it wasn't until it was reviewed by SCOTUS that the judge even knew. There's a reason it took so long to dismiss and being able to say it was Smith's fault is laughable when the judge didn't even know.

Unfortunately, that's not how it works. You probably even know that's not how it works, but you're never going to admit it. OTOH, most people know that when you're impersonating a peace officer, you're still not a cop no matter how much you think you are.

It is how it works. You trying to prove Smith is liable here is your own bullshit. Should we prosecute the judge that allowed the case to proceed as well?

Lol.....good luck on that hill....

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

For nearly a decade, this forum has been peppered with predictions of Trump’s imminent incarceration and/or permanent exile from public office.

Fortunately none of these predictions have materialized. The politically motivated legal attacks have been foiled. The lawfare is over.

 

[AceDesSpades]

Damn.

What do we do for encore?

 

[ll74]

Damn.

What do we do for encore?

Arpy believes suing Smith is the next act.

Grab your popcorn

 

[Lance_Castro]

Damn.

What do we do for encore?

Chip in to buy a copy of Law For Dummies for HarpoonLampoon Esq.

 

[AceDesSpades]

H/she can default on a student loan like everyone else.

 

[HisArpy]

He was acting on the authority of the DoJ. What sort of that are you avoiding?

What part of UNLAWFULLY appointed don't you understand? An illegal act is an illegal act even if done by the Government. Thus, his appointment cannot be made lawful merely because the government did it.

See: Every fucking legal decision ever handed down finding the government overstepped.

He had no expectation that his authority wasn't valid. Especially since it wasn't until it was reviewed by SCOTUS that the judge even knew. There's a reason it took so long to dismiss and being able to say it was Smith's fault is laughable when the judge didn't even know.

This is a defense called "reasonable reliance." Cops use it when they kick down the door of the wrong house because of a typo on the warrant paperwork.

Normally it would work to protect Smith, except once SCOTUS ruled that Trump had immunity and that Smith was unlawfully appointed, Smith didn't cease and desist. Instead he doubled down and empaneled a second Grand Jury to indict Trump after doing some creative editing on the language in the indictment (ie; claiming that Trump's official acts weren't done by him officially) to try and get around the SCOTUS decision on immunity.

Except that doesn't solve the unlawfully appointed issue. Being unlawfully appointed doesn't allow him to do any of that. That he did it, KNOWING his appointment wasn't valid, is where he fucked up. Had he taken his lumps and admitted defeat, he'd have avoided personal liability on the basis of "reasonable reliance."

It is how it works. You trying to prove Smith is liable here is your own bullshit. Should we prosecute the judge that allowed the case to proceed as well?

Lol.....good luck on that hill....

It is how it works. That you want to insist that it doesn't sounds like a you problem, not a me problem.

BTW, the judge would have immunity unless the court acted outside of its authority. There's nothing to suggest that the trial court's decisions in this case are unlawful. Biased, maybe, but not unlawful.

 

[HisArpy]

Arpy believes suing Smith is the next act.

Grab your popcorn

I doubt Trump will sue.

Not only would it not net him anything in the long run except revenge, but he'd be facing a biased court at the same time. A biased court which could rule against him because of that bias and open him up to a counter-claim from Smith.

That doesn't mean that in a perfect judicial system he wouldn't have a viable case.

 

[AceDesSpades]

He's already had his revenge.

Now comes the gloat.

In your face...

~tee hee~

 

[ll74]

What part of UNLAWFULLY appointed don't you understand? An illegal act is an illegal act even if done by the Government. Thus, his appointment cannot be made lawful merely because the government did it.

See: Every fucking legal decision ever handed down finding the government overstepped.



This is a defense called "reasonable reliance." Cops use it when they kick down the door of the wrong house because of a typo on the warrant paperwork.

Normally it would work to protect Smith, except once SCOTUS ruled that Trump had immunity and that Smith was unlawfully appointed, Smith didn't cease and desist. Instead he doubled down and empaneled a second Grand Jury to indict Trump after doing some creative editing on the language in the indictment (ie; claiming that Trump's official acts weren't done by him officially) to try and get around the SCOTUS decision on immunity.

Except that doesn't solve the unlawfully appointed issue. Being unlawfully appointed doesn't allow him to do any of that. That he did it, KNOWING his appointment wasn't valid, is where he fucked up. Had he taken his lumps and admitted defeat, he'd have avoided personal liability on the basis of "reasonable reliance."



It is how it works. That you want to insist that it doesn't sounds like a you problem, not a me problem.

BTW, the judge would have immunity unless the court acted outside of its authority. There's nothing to suggest that the trial court's decisions in this case are unlawful. Biased, maybe, but not unlawful.

Who appointed him?

Is .Smith responsible for being appointed?

Apparently you believe he is.

Police breaking the law doesn't rely on whether they were employed as police officers.

Good luck on your expectations.

 

[HisArpy]

Who appointed him?

Is .Smith responsible for being appointed?

Apparently you believe he is.

Police breaking the law doesn't rely on whether they were employed as police officers.

Good luck on your expectations.

If a cop breaks down a door AFTER he was told it's the wrong door, THE COP is personally liable as well as the Dept.

If the Cop fabricates an invalid warrant and uses that to kick open someone's door, the cop is PERSONALLY LIABLE and the Dept IS NOT.


SCOTUS told the lower courts that Smith wasn't lawfully appointed. Smith then chose to re-indict Trump.

Good luck trying to say that he was acting for the DOJ (even though it's not a DOJ position and is supposed to be wholly separate) when he UNLAWFULLY indicted Trump after the SCOTUS said he had no lawful authority.