Allowed HTML in stories?

[sr71plt]

Try to keep up, Bucky. The thread clearly shows that I tried to figure out what you were asking and then--despite your nastiness on a problem that was yours, not mine, I continued to try to get what you meant answered. My basic mistake was in trying to help you in the first place.

 

[JKendallDane]

I get it. You enjoy attaching names to me. I'm a cheater, snarky and now an ass.

You mean he hasn't accused you of "being an alt" yet?

 

[BuckyDuckman]

Try to keep up, Bucky. The thread clearly shows that I tried to figure out what you were asking and then--despite your nastiness on a problem that was yours, not mine, I continued to try to get what you meant answered. My basic problem was in trying to help you in the first place.

I read threads very well, Pilot. Shall we revisit your first two replies to the thread? First, where you attacked the question being asked and misinterpreted the question based on your previous experience in the non-digital world.

Indenting for what purpose? I don't think Lit. is going to permit you to indent each paragraph. That's not their standard format.

Second where you again attacked the question and you miss PL's citation of her an example displaying the answer:

Again, for what purpose? Can you cite the story that was accepted?

As for help, do you mean this post where you try to get an answer to question I wasn't asking? The post you made after three other people had given me an answer and even guessed the reason behind my initial inquiry:

Yes, I can see for that. I'm trying to see if anyone was permitted to indent paragraphs.

And I'm the one with the reading problem???

I'm fine with pointing out the obvious, Pilot.

1. Question asked
2. Question challenged and misinterpreted
3. Question answered with an example given
4. Question challenged again and citation missed
5. Question understood along with an example given for its use
6. Question again understood with another example for the answer's purpose
7. Citation repeated with a link this time.
8. Repeated misinterpretation of original question
9. Another fine answer to the original question . . .

 

[walkerlong]

Just walk away, people. The main area of contention has devolved to "sr71plt is a bad person" and I don't think he's going to concede that point. Time to walk away.