SweetErika
Fingers Crossed
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2004
- Posts
- 13,442
Nicely said!I don't want to add fuel, but...
I don't think the comparison between a surrogate mother and this proposal is all that accurate. A surrogate mother is more often than not implanted with the couples fertilised egg (so in other words, the parents would be giving the egg and the sperm) and the surrogate 'rents' the womb. Furthermore, most surrogates are implanted medically, so she does not become pregnant the old fashioned way. Also, surrogates have to go through a lengthy legal process, signing a load of forms, and she is compensated, quite well, for her time and use of her body.
What the OP seems to be proposing is finding a male to impregnate his wife, and what the How-Toers are pointing out that there are not only the legal repercussions but also the many consequences that the idea may lead, first and foremost that it will be done 'under the table', along with the trying to understand the debate about money.
The How-To regulars are helping him, they are providing the OP with additional options and other avenues to explore, with brutal honesty. The How-To board is well known for its informativeness, open-mindedness, intelligence, and honesty.
Again, I don't mean to cause any arguments, merely pointing out what I see as facts.
And, well, if someone posted here looking for a surrogate or advertising their desire to be one in the same manner, I'm sure they'd get a very similar response from all of us.