LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Anal sex with a slave

The slave has the rights as defined in the contract
Continuation after use of the safe word is rape and can get you in to a bit of bother with the authority's
 
okay, but this came up in the other section:
'spose the slave is a recently captured south american dictator? -- entirely hypothetical question, not related to any actual events or people whatsoever.
is it (the slave, that is) allowed to refuse anal?
 
Any ‘hard limits’ should be agreed beforehand and a safe word should always be present in any D/S situationship. That being said most subs enter these dynamics to have their boundaries tested. As a dom I wouldn’t jump straight to anal fucking with my cock. Build up over time with fingers, butt plugs, dildos etc.
 
kinkychatonly said:
Any ‘hard limits’ should be agreed beforehand and a safe word should always be present in any D/S situationship. That being said most subs enter these dynamics to have their boundaries tested. As a dom I wouldn’t jump straight to anal fucking with my cock. Build up over time with fingers, butt plugs, dildos etc.
Click to expand...
I'd love to submit to that
 
Some may have noticed by now that I have a penchant for lengthy replies to seemingly straightforward questions. In this case the broader question of the meaning of the term "slave" and how that concept relates to limits and safewords is an important one I think - and so I will share a few reflections.

The background here is that I have been in a high power exchange relationship with my amazing and stunning partner for nine years now.

The first question is one of vocabulary. Labels are always hard, and obviously will carry different meanings in different contexts. But I think that we would all agree that the term "slave" implies a higher degree of power exchange and fewer limits and constraints on the Master's (or Mistress') behavior than the term "submissive". And it is certainly the case that in some M/s relationships, maybe most, those limits and constraints are minimized or non-existent. I have heard others describe their relationship as being "CNC" - meaning that the slave has consented to the M not requiring consent at all in any situation.

In our case, my slave does not have safewords. This is by her own choice. She prefers that my expression of my natural personality be unfettered. That naturally extends to the topic of this thread.

But we do have limits. In a certain sense they are soft limits, in that I could in theory break them and her only recourse would be to return my collar (which would be a dire situation for both of us). But in a practical sense we are partners, and I choose not to break our agreements. I may ask to revisit them (as she might), and we have done so over the years (in both directions, ie both more and less constraining for me). We do have a written slave contract that lays our our agreements and that we modify as required.

So now to circle back to the OP - a slave has whatever rights they have agreed to with their Master/Mistress. In many cases, those rights are minimal, thus the title of slave rather than submissive. Short of a significant medical issue, I cannot imagine any M type person agreeing to a hard limit of no anal sex of any kind with someone that they called their slave - unless they simply do not enjoy it at all. But since pushing your slave to do hard things for you in order to demonstrate their submission to your control over them is a big part of most power dynamics, even if the M does not enjoy it they would probably still expect their slave to submit to whatever anal play they desired.
 
Kevinjkson said:
Some may have noticed by now that I have a penchant for lengthy replies to seemingly straightforward questions. In this case the broader question of the meaning of the term "slave" and how that concept relates to limits and safewords is an important one I think - and so I will share a few reflections.

The background here is that I have been in a high power exchange relationship with my amazing and stunning partner for nine years now.

The first question is one of vocabulary. Labels are always hard, and obviously will carry different meanings in different contexts. But I think that we would all agree that the term "slave" implies a higher degree of power exchange and fewer limits and constraints on the Master's (or Mistress') behavior than the term "submissive". And it is certainly the case that in some M/s relationships, maybe most, those limits and constraints are minimized or non-existent. I have heard others describe their relationship as being "CNC" - meaning that the slave has consented to the M not requiring consent at all in any situation.

In our case, my slave does not have safewords. This is by her own choice. She prefers that my expression of my natural personality be unfettered. That naturally extends to the topic of this thread.

But we do have limits. In a certain sense they are soft limits, in that I could in theory break them and her only recourse would be to return my collar (which would be a dire situation for both of us). But in a practical sense we are partners, and I choose not to break our agreements. I may ask to revisit them (as she might), and we have done so over the years (in both directions, ie both more and less constraining for me). We do have a written slave contract that lays our our agreements and that we modify as required.

So now to circle back to the OP - a slave has whatever rights they have agreed to with their Master/Mistress. In many cases, those rights are minimal, thus the title of slave rather than submissive. Short of a significant medical issue, I cannot imagine any M type person agreeing to a hard limit of no anal sex of any kind with someone that they called their slave - unless they simply do not enjoy it at all. But since pushing your slave to do hard things for you in order to demonstrate their submission to your control over them is a big part of most power dynamics, even if the M does not enjoy it they would probably still expect their slave to submit to whatever anal play they desired.
Click to expand...
Oh yes I want to
 
When I was with my ex I wanted us both to be "owned" a "slave" etc but never really came to anything even though it was spoken a lot during sex.
But I wouldn't say no to anything now during sex I love to please and tick off other fantasys and try new things
 
Kevinjkson said:
Some may have noticed by now that I have a penchant for lengthy replies to seemingly straightforward questions. In this case the broader question of the meaning of the term "slave" and how that concept relates to limits and safewords is an important one I think - and so I will share a few reflections.

The background here is that I have been in a high power exchange relationship with my amazing and stunning partner for nine years now.

The first question is one of vocabulary. Labels are always hard, and obviously will carry different meanings in different contexts. But I think that we would all agree that the term "slave" implies a higher degree of power exchange and fewer limits and constraints on the Master's (or Mistress') behavior than the term "submissive". And it is certainly the case that in some M/s relationships, maybe most, those limits and constraints are minimized or non-existent. I have heard others describe their relationship as being "CNC" - meaning that the slave has consented to the M not requiring consent at all in any situation.

In our case, my slave does not have safewords. This is by her own choice. She prefers that my expression of my natural personality be unfettered. That naturally extends to the topic of this thread.

But we do have limits. In a certain sense they are soft limits, in that I could in theory break them and her only recourse would be to return my collar (which would be a dire situation for both of us). But in a practical sense we are partners, and I choose not to break our agreements. I may ask to revisit them (as she might), and we have done so over the years (in both directions, ie both more and less constraining for me). We do have a written slave contract that lays our our agreements and that we modify as required.

So now to circle back to the OP - a slave has whatever rights they have agreed to with their Master/Mistress. In many cases, those rights are minimal, thus the title of slave rather than submissive. Short of a significant medical issue, I cannot imagine any M type person agreeing to a hard limit of no anal sex of any kind with someone that they called their slave - unless they simply do not enjoy it at all. But since pushing your slave to do hard things for you in order to demonstrate their submission to your control over them is a big part of most power dynamics, even if the M does not enjoy it they would probably still expect their slave to submit to whatever anal play they desired.
Click to expand...
I enjoy anal sex as much as he does. No , ho doesn't need my consent by any means. The only thing I ask is let me prepare prior to starting. What do I mean by 'prepare' ? I need to take measures to prevent 'unpleasant accidents' during anal sex. That's all I have to say on this matter.
 
MrsKissit said:
I enjoy anal sex as much as he does. No , ho doesn't need my consent by any means. The only thing I ask is let me prepare prior to starting. What do I mean by 'prepare' ? I need to take measures to prevent 'unpleasant accidents' during anal sex. That's all I have to say on this matter.
Click to expand...
I completely understand
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

KentBloke63
Women - Anal sex. Do you prefer it?
6 7 8
Replies
188
Views
9K
crow169
crow169
M
Seeking suggestions for a slave ownership ceremony
Replies
15
Views
953
wifes_fag
W
missmixalot
Consensual subdegation
Replies
15
Views
627
Samantha47
S
H
29 Indian Female, looking for a dominating online partner for daily sex chat on Google Chat
Replies
3
Views
318
dick_0069
D
Titman69x
Appropriate punishments
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
SmilingLez
SmilingLez
Back
Top