HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 47,006
I’d love to hear how they’re obstructing federal enforcement. Any examples? Court cases?
Here you go
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d love to hear how they’re obstructing federal enforcement. Any examples? Court cases?
Why is Que butthurt, and what did I ever do to him?
Sounds like you are probably projecting. There seems to be a lot of that going around.
Talk about deflection. No one is talking about requiring cities to perform enforcement activities. What is being discussed by the adults is active obstruction of federal enforcement, which as the original post points out is a Federal crime, in and of itself.
. . .but since you seem to insist on answers to your poorly formed questions, yes, they certainly can and fo participate in federal enforcement actions, should they choose to. Many local ordinances are patterned after and concurrent to Federal Statutes.
For instance, Spider Clown forgets (to be kind) the States collect Federal income taxes which is an enforcement of federal law. He fails to understand that States cannot have their own immigration system.
I'm sorry no one is taking you up on your straw man argument. No one is talking about local law enforcement being required to "do anything" other than refrain from actively harboring illegal aliens or violating public records laws by not disclosing the whereabouts of illegal aliens within their custody.
Maybe you'll have better luck arguing the matter at hand, rather than one you made up.
And again, no law enforcement official anywhere is harboring illegal aliens. You seem to be having a real hard time understanding what a sanctuary city is, what the laws are and what a strawman is.
So like we’ve discussed several times local law enforcement can’t do anything with federal immigration laws even if they wanted to.
And again, no law enforcement official anywhere is harboring illegal aliens. You seem to be having a real hard time understanding what a sanctuary city is, what the laws are and what a strawman is.
So if a murder/ robbery crosses state lines it becomes a federal crime but state and local officials can't enforce the law and apprehend the criminals. So all the intelligence work done by NYPD to stave off a terrorist attack is unauthorized because it's fed law. For a city or state to formulate a state statute proclaiming itself a sanctuary city or state is in direct conflict with fed immigration statutes and feds could prosecute politicians on so many levels. Courts that harbour illegals could find themselves in legal trouble.
So like we’ve discussed several times local law enforcement can’t do anything with federal immigration laws even if they wanted to.
I wonder how that Oakland mayor is feeling right about now?