AwkwardMD AI Rejection Help Desk

[Djinn68]

I never said it was nefarious, I'm not assuming ill intent

But if Lit uses tools that look for machine-generated content, could you see how this might somehow be triggering it? Philosophically it might be in a different category from LLM-generated text, but mechanically the end result might be similar?

No - I can't see how a decently programmed tool could misinterpret <i>this</i> and <b>this></b> and <center>this</center> as machine generated content - as I wrote my complete first series with notepad+ and did these things manually at that time.

 

[AwkwardMD]

No - I can't see how a decently programmed tool could misinterpret <i>this</i> and <b>this></b> and <center>this</center> as machine generated content - as I wrote my complete first series with notepad+ and did these things manually at that time.

Keep it simple. You don’t need to run your story through a Rube Goldberg clockwork. The formatting is less important than the story.

 

[Djinn68]

Okay

Meaning - this is all the help I can get here, because ... Okay, let's try it this way:

The version of MS Word I use at home is the same as the one at work—thanks to the office license, I don't need to install my own MS Office at home. However, this also has the disadvantage that the document contains personal information about me. My first and last name, for example. Is it conceivable that I might not necessarily want to upload this information?

 

[Djinn68]

Keep it simple. You don’t need to run your story through a Rube Goldberg clockwork. The formatting is less important than the story.

I agree to disagree. It has not been a problem for the last 600'000+ words. I cannot see any reason (apart of kowtowing, of course) why that should suddenly change.

 

[AwkwardMD]

I agree to disagree. It has not been a problem for the last 600'000+ words. I cannot see any reason (apart of kowtowing, of course) why that should suddenly change.

There are free alternatives. Google Docs is the one I use, but I've seen others in the AH (Recent thread link goes here)

 

[Djinn68]

@AwkwardMD:

I might have found the damning reason (although, only time will tell): Whenever you write 3 dots in word -> ... this nice little MS-program makes one character out of it: …

On my last submission I forgot to manually replace the word-character in my textfile with ordinary 3 dots.

That might have triggered Cerberus at the gates - if so, I'd feel very, very stupid for a while ...

 

[SkyBubble]

All due respect, but I don’t believe you. I've seen you paste entire ChatGPT replies into these forums as if they were your own thoughts and words. I have tried to engage you on the subject numerous times over the past few months, and your responses have been wildly inconsistent.

Not true.

 

[Minato_99]

@AwkwardMD
Would it be a good idea to turn off Text Prediction? I did just in case, but still wondered about it.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Yes. Yes, it would be a good idea to turn off text prediction.

 

[SkyBubble]

@AwkwardMD
Would it be a good idea to turn off Text Prediction? I did just in case, but still wondered about it.

Yes, a very good idea.

 

[SkyBubble]

Write your own story, edit your own story, and you'll be fine.

Not necessarily.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Yes, a very good idea.

I am asking you nicely, please, stop contributing to this thread.

 

[SoCalAshley]

Hello—may I message you privately? I have a story that has stayed in pending for 16 days.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Yes, but I would worry about a rejection when you receive one. A story stuck in the queue is not a rejection.

 

[LopaSen]

Absolutely bullshit. This site has no real editors. They just accept submissions from those who pay for the servers. Genuine writers and budding writers are not allowed to publish their work.

 

[AwkwardMD]

Absolutely bullshit. This site has no real editors. They just accept submissions from those who pay for the servers. Genuine writers and budding writers are not allowed to publish their work.

I'm sorry you feel that way. Best of luck with your future writing.

 

[PennyThompson]

Absolutely bullshit. This site has no real editors. They just accept submissions from those who pay for the servers. Genuine writers and budding writers are not allowed to publish their work.

Ma'am this is an Arby's

 

[Actingup]

Meaning - this is all the help I can get here, because ... Okay, let's try it this way:

The version of MS Word I use at home is the same as the one at work—thanks to the office license, I don't need to install my own MS Office at home. However, this also has the disadvantage that the document contains personal information about me. My first and last name, for example. Is it conceivable that I might not necessarily want to upload this information?

Just in case it's helpful... I use the process described here when working with Word to remove private info.

That's not how I've ended up doing most of my writing though. These days, I write in Word, then copy to Google Docs for collaboration with my besties, and copy the end result back to Word. I then run a macro to do the HMTL tagging, then copy and paste the result into the text submission box, then iterate any changes through the Word document to keep things consistent as I debug the formatting and do any last minute changes. So far no issues.

 

[SkyBubble]

That seems complicated.

 

[Bamagan]

Ma'am this is an Arby's

But... @onehitwanda told me it was a Wendy's?!

 

[onehitwanda]

But... @onehitwanda told me it was a Wendy's?!

The AI hallucinated again.

 

[Bamagan]

The AI hallucinated again.

I suppose that makes sense. They all serve slop.

 

[_Lynn_]

As the OP stated: The purpose of this thread is not to help AI-assisted writing be published on Literotica, but to help authors who did not understand that what they were doing violated the rules.

Let's stick to the topic please.


EF Mod

 

[dmallord]

No amount of "I only used AI to do X" is acceptable. Lit's AI Detector knows when you've allowed something inhuman to fiddle with your story, and getting it posted once it gets that first red flag usually requires someone else (like me) to vouch for you personally.

This is a bit like a boxer failing a PED test and saying "I only took it the one time, a couple weeks ago, because my mate was moving and I knew I was gonna have to carry his couch. It's like 3 flights of stairs!"

I'm sorry, but you might need to scrap that story and start over.

My rejection notice says it expects most of the story to be human written and that it is okay to use programs for spelling such as MS and Grammaryly just not to have those programs write or rewrite text. I use an obsolete version Mac MS Word that MS no longer supports. The spell checker and thesis as 'unsupported'' and disabled by MS. I subscribe to Grammarly Pro and have it on checking my spellings instead. I refuse to sign up for MS Word new monthly subscriptions sine I wrrite very few stories these days at 86 years old.

I insert HTML simple codes by hand for centering, bold, italic only. Those are done mostly after the edit is returned to me in MS Word by Kenji. I copy that text and paste it into the Lit window after having issues when I first started with bad formating being posted in MS Word looking ok but wrong on Lit.

Grammarly wants to rewrite some of my sentences [even here but I left them in for you to see], but I do not accept them. My words only flowing into my 70 other so stories.

I edit my stories and also send them to Kenjisato who edits for me. His grammar and suggestions are human and not machine offered changes. He sticks to spelling grammar and occasionally anticident clarifications.

Did I miss something in this thread about help? Your helping someone? I dont see anything you have written that is particularly helpful. Do you actually read them for AI and offer suggestions to change the story based upon your AI intuition in Lit's rejections?

The rejections treads seem to believe it it all over the place without rhyme or reason.

 

[AwkwardMD]

.Did I miss something in this thread about help? Your helping someone? I dont see anything you have written that is particularly helpful. Do you actually read them for AI and offer suggestions to change the story based upon your AI intuition in Lit's rejections?

The rejections treads seem to believe it it all over the place without rhyme or reason.

Are you asking for help, or just taking passive aggressive shots at me?

If you want to know the purpose, I'll refer you to the initial post:

.The purpose of this thread is not to help AI-assisted writing be published on Literotica, but to help authors who did not understand that what they were doing violated the rules. In other words, if you don’t know why your story was rejected, I can’t help you.

Unfortunately, I can't control who wanders in here and wants to talk about whatever, so I'm not sure what you were expecting. If I could control that, you and I would not be having this conversation right now.

Grammarly is a too-often-to-be-ignored common thread in AI rejections. I don’t know why anyone paying attention to any of these threads would use it, and would suggest you get rid of it for future writing, but that doesn't help your current WIP. Unfortunately, there's not much more I can suggest based on how you have described your writing process (assuming it's true).

The next step that Lit suggests is to resubmit your story with a Note to the Admin stating that AI was not used in the creation of your story. Good luck.