BDSM News Alert... First on CNBC

Lamont Cranston

Really Experienced
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Posts
290
Whipping Corporate America into Shape

I just can't resist giving everyone an alert on this one... CNBC is promoting a segment on this afternoon's 'On the Money' show (airs from 5 to 6 pm eastern in the US -- sorry not sure if it is available in other parts of the world).

My bad, the broadcast time is between 7 & 8 eastern.

The promo says 'a Dominatrix shares her secrets...' Hmm... Could be interesting.
 
Last edited:
Lamont Cranston said:
Whipping Corporate America into Shape

I just can't resist giving everyone an alert on this one... CNBC is promoting a segment on this afternoon's 'On the Money' show (airs from 5 to 6 pm eastern in the US -- sorry not sure if it is available in other parts of the world).

My bad, the broadcast time is between 7 & 8 eastern.

The promo says 'a Dominatrix shares her secrets...' Hmm... Could be interesting.
Apologies, I am not quite fully awake here yet Lamont, I wonder if that is similar to an article about a book release that I read recently. I'll do a search for it and add it here in edit for reference a little later. We can compare notes.
 
Lamont , I wonder if it's anything to do with Corporate Dominatrix Matrix. I am not US based so perhaps you will give us an update after viewing. I sourced the original article that I read to here . I would love to know which Corporations are potentially adaptive to the philosophy.
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
Lamont , I wonder if it's anything to do with Corporate Dominatrix Matrix. I am not US based so perhaps you will give us an update after viewing. I sourced the original article that I read to here . I would love to know which Corporations are potentially adaptive to the philosophy.

I think we're defintely talking about the same thing here. I will definitely be watching and providing an update. They've also upgraded their website so after it runs I'll see what is available there.
 
Lamont Cranston said:
I think we're defintely talking about the same thing here. I will definitely be watching and providing an update. They've also upgraded their website so after it runs I'll see what is available there.
:cool: they may even have transcripts , thank you Lamont.
 
Yeah, not very impressive

myinnerslut said:
i wasnt impressed with it, but thanks for the heads up

I have to agree and I'm glad I didn't give up anything important to watch, but hey you get your giggles where you can.

The author went through the Dominant roles you can see in the article rebecca linked. No companies were mentioned as being adaptive or progressive. She did pick some celebrity CEOs to match with the roles -- Carly F (former HP) was the Amazon... Hmmm... Martha S was mentioned and Oprah got could fit two of the roles.

I'll keep an eye open for either video available or a transcript but will agree with mis that there is no great reason to go out of your way for it. Well, at least they didn't trash us on TV for a change...
LC
 
Lamont Cranston said:
:mad: But.. But... I want to be an amazon or a queen... I hate discrimination at all levels.. :mad:
LC
If you like I could refer to you as "Queen Lamont" on the Lit Boards from now on :)

I aim to please :rose:

Actually thank you , I appreciate the synopsis you provided above.
 
Last edited:
"They told me to be careful..."

Okay, I deserved that one. You're welcome for the synopsis. Now how much chocolate is it going to take to never read that one again?
LC
 
Lamont Cranston said:
Okay, I deserved that one. You're welcome for the synopsis. Now how much chocolate is it going to take to never read that one again?
LC
: laughs : please consider trusting me Lamont, it won't happen :)......even I know better than that !

No more chocolate need be harmed :cool:
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
If you like I could refer to you as "Queen Lamont" on the Lit Boards from now on :)

I aim to please :rose:

Actually thank you , I appreciate the synopsis you provided above.


OH PLEASE...PLEASE PLEASE....Let me call Him Queen Lamont. You just don't know the pleasure it would give me.

(Oh...i'm so gonna get a beatin'. ;) )
 
HottieMama said:
OH PLEASE...PLEASE PLEASE....Let me call Him Queen Lamont. You just don't know the pleasure it would give me.

(Oh...i'm so gonna get a beatin'. ;) )

I doubt that because I hear you like a beatin'. I'm sure I could come up with something better if I had to.

Thank you rebecca. I'm happy to trust you...
LC
 
Lamont Cranston said:
I doubt that because I hear you like a beatin'. I'm sure I could come up with something better if I had to.

Thank you rebecca. I'm happy to trust you...
LC

Oh...i'm sure you could too. And yes, i'm rather fond of certain types of beatings... :catroar:
 
:disclaimer:

HottieMama said:
OH PLEASE...PLEASE PLEASE....Let me call Him Queen Lamont. You just don't know the pleasure it would give me.

(Oh...i'm so gonna get a beatin'. ;) )
:eek: NooOOoooOOoooOOOOoooo

You're a naughty girl . I so won't be doing it and I am sure if Lamont has any views on the matter and cares to share them ....

Can we spell 'attempted topping from the bottom' Miss HM :laughsmiles:
 
things interupt me mid post.........

Lamont Cranston said:
I doubt that because I hear you like a beatin'. I'm sure I could come up with something better if I had to.

Thank you rebecca. I'm happy to trust you...
LC

What he said ^ : chuckles :
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
:eek: NooOOoooOOoooOOOOoooo

You're a naughty girl . I so won't be doing it and I am sure if Lamont has any views on the matter and cares to share them ....

Can we spell 'attempted topping from the bottom' Miss HM :laughsmiles:


Ohh..Lamont knows i'm a BIG ol' brat... ;) It's a part of my charm....sometimes
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
:eek: NooOOoooOOoooOOOOoooo

You're a naughty girl . I so won't be doing it and I am sure if Lamont has any views on the matter and cares to share them ....

Can we spell 'attempted topping from the bottom' Miss HM :laughsmiles:

Before I move on to other subjects... Happy belated birthday to you ms rebecca.. I hope it was a good day, that the next year is a great one and that all your wishes come true -- although I'm sorry to say there were probably too few candles to get everything you want... That comes when you get like me, so many candles the frosting melts...

Other subjects...

I can definitely spell topping from the bottom but that's about all I can do with that subject that is positive. I'm new to lit but I have been a Dom since some of you weren't legal for me to the even think about... rebecca you seem to have great wisdom and we'll hope that 'someone' will listen to your sage advice. I'm just 'sayun'.. someone who wants a spanking might have to wait a long, long time for one with certain kinds of behavior... There are much better ways to get what you want... Now I'm wishing I knew were Sir Winston got some of his icons... they'd be useful here...
LC
 
@}-}rebecca---- said:
:eek: NooOOoooOOoooOOOOoooo

You're a naughty girl . I so won't be doing it and I am sure if Lamont has any views on the matter and cares to share them ....

Can we spell 'attempted topping from the bottom' Miss HM :laughsmiles:

Before I move on to other subjects... Happy belated birthday to you ms rebecca.. I hope it was a good day, that the next year is a great one and that all your wishes come true -- although I'm sorry to say there were probably too few candles to get everything you want... That comes when you get like me, so many candles the frosting melts...

Other subjects...

I can definitely spell topping from the bottom but that's about all I can do with that subject that is positive. I'm new to lit but I have been a Dom since some of you weren't legal for me to the even think about... rebecca you seem to have great wisdom and we'll hope that 'someone' will listen to your sage advice. I'm just 'sayun'.. someone who wants a spanking might have to wait a long, long time for one with certain kinds of behavior... There are much better ways to get what you want... Now I'm wishing I knew where Sir Winston got some of his icons... they'd be useful here...
LC
 
**goes and sits quietly in the corner**

i'm sorry, Sir. :rose:

:cattail:
 
Last edited:
Lamont Cranston said:
I can definitely spell topping from the bottom but that's about all I can do with that subject that is positive. I'm new to lit but I have been a Dom since some of you weren't legal for me to the even think about... rebecca you seem to have great wisdom and we'll hope that 'someone' will listen to your sage advice. I'm just 'sayun'.. someone who wants a spanking might have to wait a long, long time for one with certain kinds of behavior... There are much better ways to get what you want... Now I'm wishing I knew where Sir Winston got some of his icons... they'd be useful here...
LC

something ive come to realize about lit subs... we're not bad, we're just playful... mabye its becuase we can be sarcastic and act a little bratty here but we cant in RL in our respective D/s relationships

as for there being better ways to get what you want.... may i please have a spanking, sir?


and for curiosities sake, how long HAVE you been a dom? the longer then youve been legal bit doesnt tell me much as im only 19
 
Last edited:
myinnerslut said:
something ive come to realize about lit subs... we're not bad, we're just playful... mabye its becuase we can be sarcastic and act a little bratty here but we cant in RL in our respective D/s relationships

as for there being better ways to get what you want.... may i please have a spanking, sir?


and for curiosities sake, how long HAVE you been a dom? the longer then youve been legal bit doesnt tell me much as im only 19

I totally agree about playful and that's what I like about Lit. Nothing to formal from either side of the equation. There is so much for all of us to learn in this environment. I can't stand the boards that pretend to be formal when they're really just full of HNGs / faux Doms/subs...

Direct answer to your question... My primary sub and I will celebrate our 21st year of that relationship on July 11 this year -- and it took us 10 years before that to figure out what we really were / are and how to make a relationship work. Without D/s we wouldn't still be together -- not enough communication...

I've seen your thread about re-evaluation and wish you the best. My 'hint' is that you probably need an in-depth communication / review of what you're both thinking ever week for quite some time...

Eventually, every other week might be okay. At 20+ years we've just reached the point where a once a month relationship review is enough.

You're doing the right things. I hope it works out well for A and you...

End of sermon... at least for now. You seem to be doing great.
 
Back
Top