Black Radical Answers The Call, Kills Two NYC Policemen

Some awareness that black demonstrators called for dead cops, and a black radical answered the call. After the groundwork was laid by the first black President, the first black Attorney General, the black Reverend Al Sharpton, and the Marxist Mayor of NYC, De Blasio. Dipshit.:rolleyes:

You're such a tool.

Obama is as white as he is black, dumb-dumb.
 
I think grown men and women know exactly what they're doing and saying. The right wing knows they're wrong and illogical. They know it. That's what makes it sad. I don't understand the human being who subscribes to that kind of philosophy. There comes a time when words don't suffice. But one man's actions do not and should not and will not ever represent a whole group. The double standards are hilarious.


They want to spin it to their narrative, that's all. They know they are wrong, and like the typical right wing conservative, never want to take ownership.

Just like how they are blaming the President, when in reality, he has not done much to stop police brutality.


Any idiot could see that the historically lackadaisical treatment given to the brute cops in police brutality cases may have been a piece of what led to this situation.

There are also the deaths of Diallo, Rice, Garner, Bell, Brown, and many others who have died at the hands of unpunished police brutality.


You can only kick dogs for so long before they retaliate.


On that note, They totally ignore that this is also a case of a crazed maniac who shot his girlfriend and wanted to make a statement, but because he is BLACK, he is not given that "mental health" benefit that they give to white male shooters!


Where's THEIR outrage? For every cop shot, there are so much more who are killed by cops for no reason. At least cop killers go punished, no much can be said about the reverse.
 
They want to spin it to their narrative, that's all. They know they are wrong, and like the typical right wing conservative, never want to take ownership.

Just like how they are blaming the President, when in reality, he has not done much to stop police brutality.


Any idiot could see that the historically lackadaisical treatment given to the brute cops in police brutality cases may have been a piece of what led to this situation.

There are also the deaths of Diallo, Rice, Garner, Bell, Brown, and many others who have died at the hands of unpunished police brutality.


You can only kick dogs for so long before they retaliate.


On that note, They totally ignore that this is also a case of a crazed maniac who shot his girlfriend and wanted to make a statement, but because he is BLACK, he is not given that "mental health" benefit that they give to white male shooters!


Where's THEIR outrage? For every cop shot, there are so much more who are killed by cops for no reason. At least cop killers go punished, no much can be said about the reverse.

Did you hear what Obama said? He basically heroized police. "I unconditionally condemn today's murder of two police officers in New York City."

"Officers who serve and protect our communities risk their own safety for ours every single day and they deserve our respect and gratitude every single day."

That's true and great, Mr. President. But when people like the OP create racist fanaticism out of it, and when the NYPD want to officially exclude the Mayor from attending funerals, and when you consider the climate of police killing people in a recurrent group...I don't like this statement. At all. What do you think about it?
 
Did you hear what Obama said? He basically heroized police. "I unconditionally condemn today's murder of two police officers in New York City."

"Officers who serve and protect our communities risk their own safety for ours every single day and they deserve our respect and gratitude every single day."

That's true and great, Mr. President. But when people like the OP create racist fanaticism out of it, and when the NYPD want to officially exclude the Mayor from attending funerals, and when you consider the climate of police killing people in a recurrent group...I don't like this statement. At all. What do you think about it?

Which is why I do not understand this crap the President gets from these right wingers. I respect the President, but he's not much of a progressive in certain aspects. I guess if you are not batshit crazy and all the way to the right, you are seen as the enemy.

I doubt the OP knows what 'marxist' even means.
 
He's not a progressive at all, he's a thrice damned centrist.

Did you hear what Obama said? He basically heroized police. "I unconditionally condemn today's murder of two police officers in New York City."

"Officers who serve and protect our communities risk their own safety for ours every single day and they deserve our respect and gratitude every single day."

That's true and great, Mr. President. But when people like the OP create racist fanaticism out of it, and when the NYPD want to officially exclude the Mayor from attending funerals, and when you consider the climate of police killing people in a recurrent group...I don't like this statement. At all. What do you think about it?

It's the only statement there is to make. The fact that he should have been out the last six years making statements for the black community doesn't change that this was the only card here.
 
He's not a progressive at all, he's a thrice damned centrist.



It's the only statement there is to make. The fact that he should have been out the last six years making statements for the black community doesn't change that this was the only card here.

He failed to address that there is clearly racist propaganda surrounding the perpetrator, and police favoritism despite the lack of ethics and morality and their part as well. He could've easily annexed onto that statement: but I implore us all to realize that there are no villains here.

Or something; he's obviously going to word it better and he should have. He should quell the tides. Not just say, "love our cops. Peace out."

He just sucks in that respect; that's probably why he hired Holder, who is more proactive and assertive about his concerns for racial equality. Obama is just a diplomat to a fault.
 
He would have stuck his foot in his mouth if he said something about a racist agenda. That's a hard sell to people who are really, really fanatically pro-black. Guy makes the statements he says then does what he does and any move he makes fucks him.

Holder hasn't been a whole lot better in my opinion.
 
He would have stuck his foot in his mouth if he said something about a racist agenda. That's a hard sell to people who are really, really fanatically pro-black. Guy makes the statements he says then does what he does and any move he makes fucks him.

Holder hasn't been a whole lot better in my opinion.

I don't see how he would have ended up having to stick his foot anywhere. Is Obama tactless like that? I don't know, you tell me. Last time I checked, the President is the primary person who should be addressing such issues, not acting like it doesn't happen for harmony's sake. That is just stupid and weak.

And even if he did anger some people.


Does he not do that already with "any move he makes?"

So don't address prevalent issues so people don't get mad? Someone with that mentality doesn't need to be in office...much less employed anywhere.

With all due respect to him. :D
 
Some awareness that black demonstrators called for dead cops, and a black radical answered the call. After the groundwork was laid by the first black President, the first black Attorney General, the black Reverend Al Sharpton, and the Marxist Mayor of NYC, De Blasio. Dipshit.:rolleyes:

There WAS NO BLACK "RADICAL."

YOUR WHITE MALE FEAR TEARS ARE DELICIOUS. KEEP FEARING EVERYTHING DIFFERENT FROM YOURSELF, YOU SCHMUCK.


http://anongallery.org/img/7/1/your-tears-are-delicious.jpg
 
Did you hear what Obama said? He basically heroized police. "I unconditionally condemn today's murder of two police officers in New York City."

"Officers who serve and protect our communities risk their own safety for ours every single day and they deserve our respect and gratitude every single day."


That Obama -- always stirring up hatred and fomenting violence!
 
I don't see how he would have ended up having to stick his foot anywhere. Is Obama tactless like that? I don't know, you tell me. Last time I checked, the President is the primary person who should be addressing such issues, not acting like it doesn't happen for harmony's sake. That is just stupid and weak.

And even if he did anger some people.


Does he not do that already with "any move he makes?"

So don't address prevalent issues so people don't get mad? Someone with that mentality doesn't need to be in office...much less employed anywhere.

With all due respect to him. :D

In the wake of two dead cops anything but Cops are awesome would turn 75% or more of the country on him and with good damn reason. That is the issue that needs addressing at this exact second is that killing cops is unnacceptable under any circumstances.
 
In the wake of two dead cops anything but Cops are awesome would turn 75% or more of the country on him and with good damn reason. That is the issue that needs addressing at this exact second is that killing cops is unnacceptable under any circumstances.


I have no problem with his statement, though I don't believe he made any statement after the politically motivated murders of the two Las Vegas police officers, nor did anyone mind that he didn't.
 
He had an impossible task

After the fact and looking back I think that there was/is a certain percentage of the population that can't help but to hold racist views. I think that after Obama got elected they sort had a mental meltdown.

Bush had just left and the coffers were empty, and these people somehow blamed Obama. I have customers that I have done work for over the years and never suspected that they were racist. But they started to make the off color remarks, almost like testing the water. Trying to see if you held the same views.

I think that Obama got this response even though he did everything in his power to appear completely neutral on anything racial. Remember the shitstorm over his remark about how Trayvon could've been his son?

Obama has disappointed me, I had hoped for more, but the battle has been much harder than it should have been. He has had to set aside his views and settle for what he can get without falling into the trap of appearing to be a champion for his race.

Nobody can ever say he couldn't be trusted to be a president for the whites as well as the blacks. His methods might make it easier for the next black man who finds himself in the same office.

But he still has two more years and with nothing to lose and the gloves off now with congress, his heroic hours may lie ahead of him.

I still think he's a good man and we need a good man now more than ever.
 
Hey Numb Nuts II, they fostered the atmosphere that lead to stupid, ignorant, barbaric demonstrators who chanted, "What Do We Want? Dead Cops! When do we want it...now!"

You big racist dummy.

Seems as though you're no fan of the First Amendment.

What a surprise. :rolleyes:
 
After the fact and looking back I think that there was/is a certain percentage of the population that can't help but to hold racist views. I think that after Obama got elected they sort had a mental meltdown.

Bush had just left and the coffers were empty, and these people somehow blamed Obama. I have customers that I have done work for over the years and never suspected that they were racist. But they started to make the off color remarks, almost like testing the water. Trying to see if you held the same views.

I think that Obama got this response even though he did everything in his power to appear completely neutral on anything racial. Remember the shitstorm over his remark about how Trayvon could've been his son?

Obama has disappointed me, I had hoped for more, but the battle has been much harder than it should have been. He has had to set aside his views and settle for what he can get without falling into the trap of appearing to be a champion for his race.

Nobody can ever say he couldn't be trusted to be a president for the whites as well as the blacks. His methods might make it easier for the next black man who finds himself in the same office.

But he still has two more years and with nothing to lose and the gloves off now with congress, his heroic hours may lie ahead of him.

I still think he's a good man and we need a good man now more than ever.
What exactly is wrong with the bold? :confused::confused:
I don't think he's a good man as much as he is a passive diplomat. But I don't think he's a corrupt individual. I think he's too nice. That is just as dangerous as being dangerous.
 
I have no doubt that he's a good man, no doubt he's done the things he felt he had to do to get by and yes utter melt down. Black man in charge scared the shit out of an entire generation of racists who'd managed to hold it in check for a long time.

Seems as though you're no fan of the First Amendment.

What a surprise. :rolleyes:

That's not fair, being a fan of the first doesn't mean you don't think that there are consequences associated or that you should own the consequences of your actions.
 
I have no doubt that he's a good man, no doubt he's done the things he felt he had to do to get by and yes utter melt down. Black man in charge scared the shit out of an entire generation of racists who'd managed to hold it in check for a long time.

I don't see any difference in white people before Obama, to the white people during his administration. If anything, they are just being stealthier and it's the calm before the storm when he's finally out.
 
After the fact and looking back I think that there was/is a certain percentage of the population that can't help but to hold racist views. I think that after Obama got elected they sort had a mental meltdown.

Bush had just left and the coffers were empty, and these people somehow blamed Obama. I have customers that I have done work for over the years and never suspected that they were racist. But they started to make the off color remarks, almost like testing the water. Trying to see if you held the same views.

I think that Obama got this response even though he did everything in his power to appear completely neutral on anything racial. Remember the shitstorm over his remark about how Trayvon could've been his son?

Obama has disappointed me, I had hoped for more, but the battle has been much harder than it should have been. He has had to set aside his views and settle for what he can get without falling into the trap of appearing to be a champion for his race.

Nobody can ever say he couldn't be trusted to be a president for the whites as well as the blacks. His methods might make it easier for the next black man who finds himself in the same office.

But he still has two more years and with nothing to lose and the gloves off now with congress, his heroic hours may lie ahead of him.

I still think he's a good man and we need a good man now more than ever.

Enjoy Obama, he's made it impossible for his party to govern for plenty of years to come.
 
That's not fair, being a fan of the first doesn't mean you don't think that there are consequences associated or that you should own the consequences of your actions.

Perhaps you and vetteman suffer from some sort of reading comprehension problem given that the OP clearly refers to the gunman as "crazed". I'm not sure what's more crazy, you and vette ascribing responsibility for the action of a "crazed" man or him for carrying out his actions.

Nevertheless, if your belief in the Constitution can be sliced and diced so finely, then I advocate neutering for the both of you so that you can't propagate your deficiencies to future generations.

On a personal note, I think the Constitution protects us most when we dare to speak out against people like vette who think that any contrary pov is treasonous. It protects us all, majority and minority alike. You don't have to like it, but you will let democracy take its natural course.
 
I don't see any difference in white people before Obama, to the white people during his administration. If anything, they are just being stealthier and it's the calm before the storm when he's finally out.

I'm glad I don't have your life. Prior to Obama I knew it was there but I could mostly ignore it. After Obama they've just gone full on nuts and I assume when he goes away they'll die back down.

Perhaps you and vetteman suffer from some sort of reading comprehension problem given that the OP clearly refers to the gunman as "crazed". I'm not sure what's more crazy, you and vette ascribing responsibility for the action of a "crazed" man or him for carrying out his actions.

Nevertheless, if your belief in the Constitution can be sliced and diced so finely, then I advocate neutering for the both of you so that you can't propagate your deficiencies to future generations.

On a personal note, I think the Constitution protects us most when we dare to speak out against people like vette who think that any contrary pov is treasonous. It protects us all, majority and minority alike. You don't have to like it, but you will let democracy take its natural course.

Not at all. Though I'm not 100% on exactly how crazed he was as far as respects to this go. However that wasn't what you accused him of. You accused him of not being a fan of the First Amendment. I don't think there are enough people calling for violence to be worried about but a lot of us were quick to jump on Sarah when we all knew "take aim" didn't mean "Shoot Giffords" so. . .sorry.

I agree it protects us most when we speak out against people like Vette.

It is vettes opinion (erroneous though it may be) that we've spent months whipping up a mob. He hasn't called for them to be silenced.
 
Back
Top