Breasts women only OO oo

I honestly never felt any kind of "difference" when my boobs started growing.

Obviously, I could see and feel them, as they grew, but psychologically, I didn't feel any different. I just took it as part of growing up, same when my periods started. A lot of that is probably to do with my Mum, and how she brought me up. She always talked openly with me and answered any questions I had, never shying away from the more personal stuff.

I took puberty in my stride, thinking and knowing how normal it was.

I do remember my first bra, but only vaguely, and feeling proud that I was becoming a woman.

Sorry, not much more to add, I have honestly never thought that deeply about this.

Lou

P.S. In regard to sex now, like most women, I presume, I love my tits being felt, squeezed, caressed, licked, played with, and I particularly love my nipples being taken into his mouth and his tongue flicked rapidly across them. NEVER fails to get me incredibly hot. ;)
 
Tatelou said:
I honestly never felt any kind of "difference" when my boobs started growing.

Obviously, I could see and feel them, as they grew, but psychologically, I didn't feel any different. I just took it as part of growing up, same when my periods started. A lot of that is probably to do with my Mum, and how she brought me up. She always talked openly with me and answered any questions I had, never shying away from the more personal stuff.

I took puberty in my stride, thinking and knowing how normal it was.

I do remember my first bra, but only vaguely, and feeling proud that I was becoming a woman.

Sorry, not much more to add, I have honestly never thought that deeply about this.

Lou

...
:)rose: * 12)
 
Looking back on those days now, I kinda wish I'd had an older sister or that my mom had been more comfortable talking about sex. I was curious to see my bust growing, but it was all shrouded in mystery and I didn't really understand the intensity of the breasts/sex connection for men until college. Everyone has them, so what's the big deal?

In high school, my breasts were mostly a nuisance...bouncing around in gym class, especially when we were jogging around the track, and then there was the 6 weeks each year when we had co-ed swim classes...I'm surprised the boys didn't drown in the deep end.

In college, it became apparent that my breasts had a power of their own even if they were always buried under sweatshirts and sweaters - it gets cold in midwest! My worst experiences, though, were during my first job out of college...lots of lecherous lawyers who would ogle when they thought I wouldn't notice.

It took a long time for me to 'get it' that I could 'control' my breasts - meaning that I could minimize, enhance, show off, or hide them depending on the reaction I wanted or didn't want. That's where bras and clothing come in. Behold! the power of the breast!
 
Several very interesting and informative posts on topic...I read each one several times...you know who you are so I won't point you out, but thank you...a few more insights on how to write a better story...for more than just myself I think.

regards...

amicus...
 
BlackSnake said:


Dude, it sounds like you are saying that it's ok for members on this board to encourage others not to provide their opinions on a thread.

Hell yes it's ok, and I had written a very long response about it, but it kept telling me I wasn't logged in and when I finally logged in my reply wans't there.

BS, don't ever tell a woman that she can't warn other women when she feels that they are walking into a trap or a bad situation.

most who didn't post here either realized that Perdita had a very excellent and valid point or they came to the same realization on their own. Those who did respond most likely took her advice into consideration and used their frail pathetic little brain and made up their own mind to take the risk.

I think that Perdita did the absolute right thing. She is not some troll, she is a very intellegent and level headed woman who has earned the respect of many on this board. And she fully diserves that respect.

The fact that amicus has nothing but venim for her, speaks more volumes than anything she herself said or could have said. I was thinking about posting some experiences, but his own words and the impression that I get from them (that he is intimidated by and can't handle a strong woman with a good mind and* a good brain) has actually changed my mind.

Perdita should absolutly be applauded for what she said, not attacked.
 
Re: Cause I want to encourage non-asshole amicus in the hopes that his evil twin dies

Lucifer_Carroll said:

P.S. It is nice to have a post from you that isn't of the assholic nature. It is quite a refreshment.

He sure does almost seem like two different people, doesn't he?
 
sweetnpetite said:
..... Those who did respond most likely took her advice into consideration and used their frail pathetic little brain and made up their own mind to take the risk.......


Erm


Did I just read that right?

I just hope you're trying to be clever and not purposefully nasty there.

Yes I decided to post....tis only some information about my tits *chuckles* I read all the rest and decided each is entitled to his/her own opinion.


Oh and Black Snake :kiss: Thanks love :)
 
English Lady...thank you for the candor in your posts...both of them...there are politics here as Queen Perdita and her minions swoop down with claws bared upon the unwary...

amicus the unrepentant...
 
English Lady said:
Erm


Did I just read that right?

I just hope you're trying to be clever and not purposefully nasty there.

Yes I decided to post....tis only some information about my tits *chuckles* I read all the rest and decided each is entitled to his/her own opinion.


Oh and Black Snake :kiss: Thanks love :)

Yes EL, you did read it right. she was paraphrasing Amicus who thinks you have a frail pathetic little brain.

Gauche
 
I have nothing against Perdita at all....nothing against anyone actually *L* I was just asking for a little clarification really*L*


EL the aimiable ;)
 
Amicus: I don't follow what Perdita says. She's my friend, but I've disagreed with her in the past and reserve the right to disagree with her in the future.

Bear in mind that I say this without prejudice or without influence from any of my friends: You are a complete wanker. You hold ridiculous opinions and I'd have you down as a troll just here to wind people up if you didn't seem so sincere. I had an honest discussion with you about the NHS and you accused me of being an Imperialist Briton "who would only be content when the sun never set on the British Empire."

You made me laugh with your response. You are an idiot and incapable of reasonable debate and, although I realise you had an honest intent behind your original post, I can't believe you didn't think that other people would take your previous posts into account before answering.

If you continue to act the fool, don't be surprised if people treat you as such.

The Earl
 
amicus said:

From as far back as I can remember...even the cartoons of long ago Alley Oop... Dogpatch...most of the popular films and commercials in all media...it is presented and accepted without complaint that the male is slow minded, bumbling, insensitive, more a bowling alley than an opera fan...futher, since the Suffragettes that brought about prohibition, and the current attack on tobacco products...to the overall atmosphere that 'men' are hostile, aggressive, war like, stubborn, foolish, impulsive and the list goes on.

A big part of the proble here is that many men *pride* themselves on this caveman sort of image, including taking pride in there own ignorance and uncouthness. Hey, *I* don't insist that a *real man* doesn't drink wine coolers or mixed drinks, doesn't go to the opera and only enjoys bowling and bear and football. It's the men thenselves who are out to prove how uncultured and simple and macho they can be.

amicus said:

Again...it was women who were the hardest to interview and discuss issues with.

And did you ever consider that this could have been a flaw within *you* and as likely as one within them? or perhaps not a flaw at all?


amicus said:
It has been and is my contention that since women were given the right to participate in political affairs, that this nation and the world has moved to the political left. That is to say that a majority of women vote for candidates and issues that give more power to government and erode the individual rights this nation was based upon.

In doing so, they have politically emasculated a large part of the concept of individual liberty and responsibility.

Look at your word usage- "emasculated" you have equated what is good with what is masculine, and a move toward what you consider as feminine as bad or emasculating. The world will *always* move to the left, because the left is progressive and the right is consevative. Just as there will always be the old guard trying to keep things the way they are, the old status quo, there will always be others pushing for change and reform. There is nothing *feminine* or *emasculating* about it. Unless you think progress is feminine and stagnation is a male trait.

amicus said:
Thirty years ago, before Roe v Wade, it was first degree murder to take the life of an unborn child. In this day and age, to even suggest that one might wish to re instate that law, brings out the worst in women.
amicus...

Here is an excellent example of the depts of your sexism. Wow! Did you know that *not every woman is pro-choice/pro-abortion*! Lots of them aren't!!! Women don't all think or believe the same. Wrap your head around this!

It is not only your ideas, but your language through and through is sexist and hostile toward women. At least own up to it, for crying out loud. There is nothing rational or intellegent about being blind to your own obvious *faults* or if you prefer to simply call them, *traits*

I took a lot of time to type out this reply by the way, and I'm not really sure in the end it will have been worth it. All I'm saying is open your eyes and see who you really are. Stop living in denial and trying to be the martr.

end rant.
 
English Lady said:
Erm


Did I just read that right?

I just hope you're trying to be clever and not purposefully nasty there.

Yes I decided to post....tis only some information about my tits *chuckles* I read all the rest and decided each is entitled to his/her own opinion.


Oh and Black Snake :kiss: Thanks love :)

Yeah, I was being sarcastic, because this is the sort of oppinion that amicus holds of women.

What I meant to say was that *all the women* whatever there choice was made up there own damn mind, possibly taking into account perdita's words, but that nobody was undully infuluenced by her because we're just to week willed to think for ourselves.

(or something like that)
 
Mckenna...thank you *smiles*

Sweetnpetite well fair enough...I guess it was a bit of sarcasm but didn't want to miss out if I actually was being insulted ;)
 
English Lady said:
Yes I decided to post....tis only some information about my tits *chuckles* I read all the rest and decided each is entitled to his/her own opinion.



I didn't mean anything against you. I hadn't even read down that far yet.:)

I almost responded myself, but just couldn't reconsile myself to it. It could have been a really interesting thread, if it had been started by somebody who 9/10ths of the AH didn't have on ignore.
 
English Lady said:
Mckenna...thank you *smiles*

Sweetnpetite well fair enough...I guess it was a bit of sarcasm but didn't want to miss out if I actually was being insulted ;)

I'm with you on that, EL. Thanks for querying it, I was about to launch into one, but that's been averted. ;)

A bit slow on the uptake sometimes...

Lou

P.S. To ALL: Live and let live, eh? I don't hold grudges, but I do have a long memory. I'm just a simple minded, yet complicated, woman. :devil:
 
SweetnPetite...

Thank you for taking the time....

your wrote:

"...The world will *always* move to the left, because the left is progressive and the right is consevative..."


Perhaps a small clarification on your definitions may give you a window into my thoughts...inane as you may think they are.

The 'right', the 'conservative' in the way I understand the terms are not necessarily only those that uphold the 'status quo', or in your view keep us tied to the errors of the past.

They are that level of thinkers that maintain the 'values' of our society in opposition to those you call 'progressive' that would destroy those values and replace them with others.

There is no doubt, in the scheme of things, a need for both. One to maintain the consistency and tradition of a people, a nation, the other to challenge with new ideas.

I also maintain that change does not come easily...that it must be fought for by those passionately dedicated and knowledgeable concerning the concepts they advocate.

Insofar as my personal opinions concerning women in general, most of the pejorative terms floated on this forum are by others, not myself.

I personally love women, and all the wonderful things about them that lighten my life and inspire my art, such as it is.

What I do not and have never appreciated in the modern woman attempting to be equal to men in all ways by sacrificing that very lovely aspect of feminity they come endowed with.

I personally think extremist feminism in the past forty years has been tragically if not terminally fatal for our society.

I have the right to that opinion without apology whether you or any other single soul shares it.

I am full aware of the pain that may be associated with the expression of some of my opinions. Many who have taken actions and chosen a lifestyle for a large part of their adult lives become livid to read of a rational challenge that may in fact cause them to suddenly gasp and realize that the consequences of their 'choices' are absolute, cannot ever be changed and in fact have determined the circumstances of many around them.

So again, thank you for taking the time...I am sure I have disappointed you and others again by not recanting all that I hold as truth.

But then, that be how the cookie crumbles...

amicus...
 
Ami, I think The Earl had a point. You did seem so sincere in your original questioning that hell, even I was tempted to answer.

Thing is, it wasn't Perdita's remarks that scared me off, it's past history with you. I kept wondering if I did answer your questions, what kind of booby-trap I was getting myself into.
 
amicus said:
SweetnPetite...

Thank you for taking the time....

your wrote:

"...The world will *always* move to the left, because the left is progressive and the right is consevative..."



There is no doubt, in the scheme of things, a need for both. One to maintain the consistency and tradition of a people, a nation, the other to challenge with new ideas.



amicus...

Before I read another word, I just want to say that this is a statement that I wholeheartedly agree with. There *is* a need for both, for the push and pull that sometimes results in a ballance and othertimes ends up with extemists (who I do not think are always good or bad) in control for a time.

I did not really mean to say (althoug it is possible that I did imply it somehow) that everything conservative or status quo is bad and every change is good, simply that the left and the right tend to stand on those ends, and that change and progress are inevitable. As time moves forward, so must we. (sometimes backing up, and sometimes moving forward too quickly, but always over all moving up and out. And with a goal of healthy growth.)
 
Back
Top