Bye, bye Bannon

[ChinoMoreno]

I thought it was Cruz?

It was, I'm in an uncaffeinated state at the moment.

 

[jaF0]

We've all seen it,

Mitch is an ignorant self-entitled jackass and the best argument I've ever seen FOR term limits. He needs to go.

Re-elect NO ONE.

 

[Aglaopheme]

There's not a single thing I support in the Rupublican's platform. I'm watching the train wreck, waiting to see just how extreme those on the right are.

 

[jaF0]

There's not a single thing I support in the Rupublican's platform.

Did you see this one?

Congress just killed a rule that would have made it easier for consumers to ...
Business Insider - 10:22am
The Senate passed a bill Tuesday to kill a regulation from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The rule would have prevented financial institutions from including forced arbitration language in contracts for things like credit cards and car loans.

.

 

[Rightguide]

He's almost certainly right about this, as well as the legal corner it painted Trump into:

I'm not sure the President is in any legal jeopardy in the firing of Comey. The Mueller investigation as bad as it is working to Trump's advantage in that it has turned up zero evidence of trump collusion with the Russians.

The Uranium One investigation could create justification for the firing of several DOJ and FBI officials, including Mueller, by the AG or the President.

 

[Rightguide]

There's not a single thing I support in the Rupublican's platform. I'm watching the train wreck, waiting to see just how extreme those on the right are.

The train wreck happened last November.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Did you see this one?






.

Yep. With Pence breaking the tie vote.

 

[Aglaopheme]

I'm not sure the President is in any legal jeopardy in the firing of Comey. The Mueller investigation as bad as it is working to Trump's advantage in that it has turned up zero evidence of trump collusion with the Russians.

The Uranium One investigation could create justification for the firing of several DOJ and FBI officials, including Mueller, by the AG or the President.

You don't know that at all. Wishful thinking is not facts.

 

[Rightguide]

You don't know that at all. Wishful thinking is not facts.

Yes I do, and so will you if you pay attention to what is happening.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The Uranium One investigation could create justification for the firing of several DOJ and FBI officials, including Mueller, by the AG or the President.

Hannity said it
Vetty believes it
That settles it.

Yo, Vetty, didja see Hannity's latest ratings? Virtually zero viewership under the age of 50.

 

[zipman]

You don't know that at all. Wishful thinking is not facts.

There is no case there, at all.

It is just a sad and pathetic attempt by republicans to distract from the Russia collusion inquiry and because investigating Hillary is the only thing Republicans seem able to do, despite failing each and every time.

 

[Aglaopheme]

There is no case there, at all.

It is just a sad and pathetic attempt by republicans to distract from the Russia collusion inquiry and because investigating Hillary is the only thing Republicans seem able to do, despite failing each and every time.

And, a tab bit amusing.

 

[Rightguide]

And, a tab bit amusing.

There is no Trump/Russian collusion but there is Clinton/DNC collusion.

 

[Rightguide]

Mueller is investigating Manafort, not because of his connections to Trump but for his connection to Podesta.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

There is no Trump/Russian collusion but there is Clinton/DNC collusion.

When Trump's appointees lie and then later admit to having conversations with Russian leaders, that doesn't qualify as collusion to you? Remember, these are his people, his appointments, his son in law, not things the media conjured up.

 

[adrina]

source

The head of a data analytics company linked to the Trump campaign contacted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2016 regarding thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails kept on a private server while she was secretary of state, according to four sources familiar with the outreach.

Alexander Nix, the chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, sent an email to several people including top Donald Trump donor Rebekah Mercer, relaying that he had emailed Assange seeking access to emails from Clinton's private server to turn them into a searchable database for the campaign or a pro-Trump political action committee, two of the sources said.

Cambridge Analytica was hired in the summer of 2016 as part of the Trump campaign's three-pronged data operation, which was led by Brad Parscale and overseen by Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner. No one from the Trump campaign was copied on the email, the sources said. Nix sent the email in summer 2016, two sources said, but it is not clear whether he sent it before or after Cambridge Analytica was brought onto the campaign.

The attempt at collaboration raises fresh questions about the willingness of people associated with the Trump campaign to work with Wikileaks for political gain. The site, which publishes leaked documents, released hacked emails in July from the Democratic National Committee and in October from Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. US intelligence has said the Podesta emails were stolen by Russia and handed over to WikiLeaks through an intermediary.

 

[Que]

When Trump's appointees lie and then later admit to having conversations with Russian leaders, that doesn't qualify as collusion to you? Remember, these are his people, his appointments, his son in law, not things the media conjured up.

Collusion (which is not a criminal offense, in any case) occurs when you "have a conversation?" or did you mean to say that lying about whether you did or didn't have a conversation somehow magically turns that conversation into collusion?

Really?

Colluding to do exactly what?

I don't think that word means what you want it to mean.

 

[Wats_butthole]

There is no Trump/Russian collusion but there is Clinton/DNC collusion.

Yes vetteman, if you say it often enough someone will believe you.

 

[Wats_butthole]

Collusion (which is not a criminal offense, in any case) occurs when you "have a conversation?" or did you mean to say that lying about whether you did or didn't have a conversation somehow magically turns that conversation into collusion?

Really?

Colluding to do exactly what?

I don't think that word means what you want it to mean.

^^^ what a stupid tranny.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

Collusion (which is not a criminal offense, in any case) occurs when you "have a conversation?" or did you mean to say that lying about whether you did or didn't have a conversation somehow magically turns that conversation into collusion?

Really?

Colluding to do exactly what?

I don't think that word means what you want it to mean.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
"It depends on what your definition of 'it' is."

So if they WEREN'T colluding, why lie about even talking to them? The defense of this administration is mind numbing.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Collusion (which is not a criminal offense, in any case) occurs when you "have a conversation?" or did you mean to say that lying about whether you did or didn't have a conversation somehow magically turns that conversation into collusion?

Really?

Colluding to do exactly what?

I don't think that word means what you want it to mean.

Conspiring to violate FEC laws is a crime.

 

[Rightguide]

When Trump's appointees lie and then later admit to having conversations with Russian leaders, that doesn't qualify as collusion to you? Remember, these are his people, his appointments, his son in law, not things the media conjured up.

Talking to Russians is not illegal or an indicator of illegal collusion to subvert the election. Hillary's collusion on the other hand is.

 

[adrina]

Talking to Russians is not illegal or an indicator of illegal collusion to subvert the election. Hillary's collusion on the other hand is.

So why'd they lie about it?

 

[Rightguide]

So why'd they lie about it?

Hide your face in shame for perpetuating bullshit for months, slink off.

 

[adrina]

Hide your face in shame for perpetuating bullshit for months, slink off.

Riiiiiight.

They just conveniently forgot. All six of them. Amazing. They're some real bright folks there.

Are you that trusting or just being purposefully naive?