Thesunmaid
Professional Snarker
- Joined
- May 4, 2017
- Posts
- 1,662
well if we banned people for swearing I would have been banned long before I ever became a mod. I have a vocabulary that would sometimes make a sailor blush at times.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When I first came on to Literotica, there were a few moderators who were this nasty and took advantage of not being able to be put on ignore. One was caught using an alt to back herself up in attacks on other posters. She eventually disappeared, but I don't know if the Web site ditched her or not.Man you have a point. But are you happy with the fact that the Moderators can say whatever they want but users can't ?
If we banned people for calling other people a name, there wouldnt be anyone left on the site. You have any idea how many PMs a girl gets on here that starts with a derogatory comment? i get at least 4-5 minimum a night where someone starts out saying "hi whore, hi slut, hi cunt... ect..". Having never talked to these people before. i dont kick or ban them, sometimes i will call them rude, more often i just ignore them and close the PM.Man you have a point. But are you happy with the fact that the Moderators can say whatever they want but users can't ?
They can only call you a cunt if you have been “verified“ as a cunt. Have you completed all the appropriate forms, and have them notarized?BitchGoblet said this to me in the Lobby. I'd like to hear your feedback. Please read the full transcript.
▸
Filling stuff.
BitchGobblet
▸
I'll fill your face.
_Tuvadine_
With your foot, ass, fingers, boobies, or fist?
BitchGobblet
Dick.
Tuvadine_
NOW WE'RE TALKING!
BaconLover
she's ahead a foot and abreast of the problem
Tuvadine_
Two abreast of it.
Sid_Viscous
BG
BaconLover
wait you cant insult people BG?
BitchGobblet
Tempeh
BitchGobblet
Why the f are you so fixated on my modding?
BaconLover
i am ?
BitchGobblet
I can call you a cunt if it's called for.
BaconLover
er okay
This is ridiculous. I'd let it go... but, obviously there are two sets of rules for this community.
I PM'd BitchGoblet and apologized to her after the interaction. She said "Great"
Later, I reconsidered and PM'd her. She justified her comments and reiterated she didn't call me a cunt - per se. Whatever, this is silly. Moderators have banned a legion of users for a lot less than this. Who exactly is watching these people? What rules do they follow?
Your thoughts?
The site has the leftist approach to free speech, as in anything they don't like is not free speech and anything their fawning bootlicks say is fine, regardless of what it is.I'm sure - but it's just ironic that a site dedicated to freedom of speech has such a double standard for moderators and users.
I completely disagree with the above post. For me, the site is well run, reasonable, and well moderated. If it were not so, I would not still be here. The boundaries set by the site owners make very good sense to me. I have yet to encounter an unfair or unreasonable moderator. And Literotica is still free, a point which I think escapes its critics.The site has the leftist approach to free speech, as in anything they don't like is not free speech and anything their fawning bootlicks say is fine, regardless of what it is.
The mods are appointed by whether or not they're toadies or friends with the owner, they're an extension of the immature, unprofessional, childish way the site is run as a whole.
Well, no, I don't agree with a moderator doing this. The very term of the position--moderator--dictates that you should rise above being belligerent in your position or just not be in that position. Site moderators should be moderating, not combating, I think. So, I reject that.Now if you are being obnoxious, a troll, combatative, hostile, belligerent, provocative and disruptive - you will probably get called a name by someone, mod or not.
Really? Cause i am pretty sure i have heard police officers swear... lawyers swear.. judges swear.. soldiers swear..Well, no, I don't agree with a moderator doing this. The very term of the position--moderator--dictates that you should rise above being belligerent in your position or just not be in that position. Site moderators should be moderating, not combating, I think. So, I reject that.
None of those is a customer service business. There is an example here of a moderator doing it really well for years--Lyn. Perhaps you should get off the minor power trip and make note how it's done with professional businesses.Really? Cause i am pretty sure i have heard police officers swear... lawyers swear.. judges swear.. soldiers swear..
Lyn is an amazing example of how to moderate well.None of those is a customer service business. There is an example here of a moderator doing it really well for years--Lyn. Perhaps you should get off the minor power trip and make note how it's done with professional businesses.
This isn't your Literotica. A designated moderator is a functionary of the owners of the Web site, and this most certainly is a customer service Web site, and it has responsibilities to its users. So, a designated moderator does too. Discussion board users most certainly are customers of the site's moderators. When a moderator can't be moderate and starts being combative, they have lost their control and their function. This is a commercial business. The customer doesn't always have to be right, but the functionaries of the business lose their professionalism and control if they don't maintain greater decorum then unruly customers do.None of these examples are similar to being a mod here at Lit, though. While I do prefer to moderate with more of a customer service approach, forum members are not my customers.
My bottom line to the question asked, context not needed, on whether a moderator should be calling a poster a cunt is no, not really, because that indicates a loss of control and a loss of the "moderator" function.
As far as where the question should have been posted, I don't think that it should be a question of choking off all response to activity here, which seems to be where this now has gone, but of where to post it. So, where should it have been posted?
Not being paid as a moderator on a commercial site isn't really justification to use position to be abusive. When a user gets abusive their abuse can (and probably should) just be erased. To have the power to do so without recourse, though, includes responsibility not to be abusive yourself. Which folds back on the question of whether a moderator here is justified in being abusive. No, I think.
The member is referring to THIS thread.] Have you reported the thread?
Yes, I’m aware. If they think it should be moved, they should report it.The member is referring to THIS thread.