CBS News Poll: The majority of Democrats are idiots.

Um, they've tanked every national election since 2008, actually--by historical margins. (The big elections they won were the presidential elections, which were basically thrown fights.)

The exceptions to this have been the state parties that tell the national party to go get fucked and do their own thing, i.e. run competent campaigns. Nevada under Reid in 2010, California in general under the Obama regime, and Connecticut last year being the big examples.

DC Democrats are spoiled rich kids with pretty much no meaningful real world experience. (And this is true of most Republicans, too, except they tend to have lower levels of achievement in formal education/alternate career tracks.) They are enlightened idiots who buy into their own hype.

I like how you try to switch things up hoping people won't catch you. First you said DC, nothing about Democrats previously. The only party that was relevant to the conversation was the Republicans. Even if the Dems did know she was breaking a rule the logical thing would be to pull her aside and advise her, not alert the press.

You sure you're not REpublican? you're certainly dishonest like one.
 
I like how you try to switch things up hoping people won't catch you. First you said DC, nothing about Democrats previously. The only party that was relevant to the conversation was the Republicans. Even if the Dems did know she was breaking a rule the logical thing would be to pull her aside and advise her, not alert the press.

You sure you're not REpublican? you're certainly dishonest like one.

I didn't switch anything up. I said political professionals in DC are fucking morons. The reason I use Democratic examples are those are the ones I actually can speak to from experience. Nothing contradictory there.

Rather than judging my character, maybe you should take a basic logic or critical thinking class and learn what it actually means to "switch things up." (Hint: Ask about the fallacy of equivocation.)
 
Most people who know how to run campaigns do not work in DC. Stupid,

What you posted was "people in D.C." Do you have any concept of who the people are who are in D.C.? Stupid right back at cha. :rolleyes:

Didn't bother to read the rest, as it was irrelevant gibberish.
 
What you posted was "people in D.C." Do you have any concept of who the people are who are in D.C.? Stupid right back at cha. :rolleyes:

Didn't bother to read the rest, as it was irrelevant gibberish.

I think I have a slightly better understanding of who they are than an internet tough guy/retired pilot who moonlights as an amatuer e-book romance novelist, yeah.
 
I didn't switch anything up. I said political professionals in DC are fucking morons. The reason I use Democratic examples are those are the ones I actually can speak to from experience. Nothing contradictory there.

Rather than judging my character, maybe you should take a basic logic or critical thinking class and learn what it actually means to "switch things up." (Hint: Ask about the fallacy of equivocation.)

Fallacy of Equivocation. How is that at all relevant? You did in fact either change definitions or were unclear. So you screwed up according to this, I just didn't know the proper terminology so I thank you.
 
All your link shows is the trumped up charge they used to justify his beating and detention at her behest.

Mine shows the that, the subsequent harassment, and that he sued and won.
It's a fucking joke, that's what it is.

The guy stood up in an audience and refused to get out of the way of people who were there to see Ms. Clinton. He deserved to be wrestled out and treated like a troublemaker, because that is exactly what he was.
 
I think I have a slightly better understanding of who they are than an internet tough guy/retired pilot who moonlights as an amatuer e-book romance novelist, yeah.

I'm happy for you being comfortable in the world you're living in (Stinking Gulch, Idaho?). You've clearly demonstrated what you know. :D

And I can quite understand why you'd try to move the discussion away from what you posted. :D
 
Last edited:
It's a fucking joke, that's what it is.

The guy stood up in an audience and refused to get out of the way of people who were there to see Ms. Clinton. He deserved to be wrestled out and treated like a troublemaker, because that is exactly what he was.

This is depressing. It's like when people refer to agitators at public events as "hecklers"--the culture has successfully led people to demonize basic rights to public expression, peaceful congregation, and seeking redress for grievances.

First, nobody deserves to be assaulted and illegally detained--you fail to mention the baseless charges were dropped so far--for peacefully practicing their rights. At least not while we're still pretending to be a democratic republic with a bill of rights.

Secondly, do you also think Secretary Clinton personally putting him on the BOLO list--the think he successfully sued State for doing--and using that to harass him and purposely frustrate his freedom to travel was also appropriate?
 
This is depressing. It's like when people refer to agitators at public events as "hecklers"--the culture has successfully led people to demonize basic rights to public expression, peaceful congregation, and seeking redress for grievances.

First, nobody deserves to be assaulted and illegally detained--you fail to mention the baseless charges were dropped so far--for peacefully practicing their rights. At least not while we're still pretending to be a democratic republic with a bill of rights.

Secondly, do you also think Secretary Clinton personally putting him on the BOLO list--the think he successfully sued State for doing--and using that to harass him and purposely frustrate his freedom to travel was also appropriate?

The Westboro Baptist Church called....they'd like you to come in for an interview as their public relations spokesman.
 
The Westboro Baptist Church called....they'd like you to come in for an interview as their public relations spokesman.

Much as I hate and despise the WBC, I believe it would be worse if they were prevented from expressing their hateful opinions.

"I do not agree with what they say, but I would defend their right to say it."
 
Back
Top