celebrity incest video

Well, the post above mine shows his stupidity. Why the fuck did I ever post here in the first place? lol I really don't need a headache today.

Bye pedo. :)
 
Fantasies_only said:
I never said that, I'm disgusted by it, and insulted that everyone thinks that of me.

If one masturbates, it does not effect anyone else, nor does an erection.
If one gets naked or watches someone getting naked, it is not physical.
If one fantasizes sexual thoughts about another without actually doing them, it isn't physical.
None of these things are sexual.
Masturbation may invoke a sexual response, but the act itself isn't sexual.

Sure you are. That's why recently you were threatening to sue Lit because you wanted to see pedo stories on here.

oh, and btw:

mas·tur·ba·tion: erotic stimulation especially of one's own genital organs commonly resulting in orgasm and achieved by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse, by instrumental manipulation, occasionally by sexual fantasies, or by various combinations of these agencies
 
Fantasies_only said:
I never said that, I'm disgusted by it, and insulted that everyone thinks that of me.

If one masturbates, it does not effect anyone else, nor does an erection.
If one gets naked or watches someone getting naked, it is not physical.
If one fantasizes sexual thoughts about another without actually doing them, it isn't physical.
None of these things are sexual.
Masturbation may invoke a sexual response, but the act itself isn't sexual.
WTF???

Then only penile/vaginal penetration can be considered physical/sexual?

Just what planet are you from?
 
cloudy said:
Sure you are. That's why recently you were threatening to sue Lit because you wanted to see pedo stories on here.

oh, and btw:

mas·tur·ba·tion: erotic stimulation especially of one's own genital organs commonly resulting in orgasm and achieved by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse, by instrumental manipulation, occasionally by sexual fantasies, or by various combinations of these agencies
Whenever I masturbate, I never have sexual intercourse.
If anything masturbation is the absence of sexual intercourse.

I did not threaten to sue Literotica.
The term to sue indicates either money or some kind of reward may be gained.
I was not asking to be rewarded, thus a lawsuit against Literotica.com was never mentioned.
 
Last edited:
Fantasies_only said:
Whenever I masturbate, I never have sexual intercourse.
If anything masturbation is the absence of sexual intercourse.
So are you saying that it is okay to post a story where it tells you masturbate while fantasizing/watching someone under 18?

No one is saying that masturbation is the intercourse itself, but the act is, by no doubt, sexual. You touch yourself, you jerk off, and that isn't sexual?

I did not threaten to sue erotica.
The term to sue indicates either money or some kind of reward may be gained.
I was not asking to be rewarded, thus a lawsuit against Literotica.com was never mentioned.

Earlier, you said
Fantasies_only said:
I fully intended to sue, but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came illegally.

I believe I've never used this term before but you've pushed my limits so far I don't even care.

Fuck off!

For real. Get some education, get a life.
 
FatDino said:
WTF???

Then only penile/vaginal penetration can be considered physical/sexual?

Just what planet are you from?
Anything that penetrates a partner and can (but doesn't have to) discharge fluids within can be called sexual, outside of a girl's finger, sex toys, and other objects.
This includes Via the mouth.

I am disgusted by actual pedophilia, and believe the non interactive things mentioned do not harm anyone in fictional stories or drawings, and I would consider it an artistic work that's protected by the first amendment of the constitution.

My only mistake was suggesting this on a Canadian site, where it is not legal to include artistic works of this type.
I acknowledged that it was an error in judgement for that suggestion a few years ago, and asked everyone to just drop it and move on.

Note: I did not apologize for there was nothing to apologize for.
 
FatDino said:
Earlier, you said


I believe I've never used this term before but you've pushed my limits so far I don't even care.

Fuck off!

For real. Get some education, get a life.
I said that about something that happened on another site which I say at the end of the same post, so you fuck off!
 
Last edited:
Hallowed Eve said:
Seriously, Fantasies_only, why the fuck should we care?
If everyone in this theard doesn't care, then why respond?
Just drop it, like that other site should have.
 
Fantasies_only said:
Anything that penetrates a partner and can (but doesn't have to) discharge fluids within can be called sexual, outside of a girl's finger, sex toys, and other objects.
This includes Via the mouth.
Then you are from some planet that isn't Earth.

I am disgusted by actual pedophilia, and believe the non interactive things mentioned do not harm anyone in fictional stories or drawings, and I would consider it an artistic work that's protected by the first amendment of the constitution.
I believe the Freedom of speech only applies in public. This site isn't public property nor the U.S. government's, it's private, therefore, the creators of the site can set whatever rules they want. Take it or leave it. Also, I do believe that it is illegal to even encourage sexual acts with children.

My only mistake was suggesting this on a Canadian site, where it is not legal to include artistic works of this type.
I acknowledged that it was an error in judgement for that suggestion a few years ago, and asked everyone to just drop it and move on.
Yea, why don't you do that here too? Shut up and move on please.

Note: I did not apologize for there was nothing to apologize for.
No one is demanding an apology from you. We're asking you to fuck off.

Fantasies_only said:
I said that about something that happened on another site which I say at the end of the same post, so you fuck off!

Fantasies_only said:
I fully intended to sue, but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came illegally.

The name pedophile was posted without any proof of such (liable)

I interpret this as you wanted to sue whoever just called you a pedophile, which I don't think has ever happened but I'm gonna get to it later, but you reconsidered it, since you had encountered troubles for saying this kind of things before.

This was what Hallowed said
Hallowed Eve said:
Who gives a shit? I mean, really. If you're a pedophile, if you're not a pedophile, who fucking cares?
Now point out please, where did she call you a pedophile? Or are you just too touchy about this because you actually are one?

P/s: That was a question, not an accusation, in case you needed clarification. Also, this is my last post in this thread in response to your idiotic comments, so yea, I guess I'm gonna fuck off now.
 
Fantasies_only said:
If everyone in this theard doesn't care, then why respond?
Just drop it, like that other site should have.

ooooh! What're you gonna do? Sue us?

:D :D :D :D

priceless, just priceless.
 
cloudy said:
That, my dear, could be dangerous. :devil:

(I might rescind my dinner invitation ;) )
Except I know that you won't, I'm too cute and you're incapable of even feigning anger at me. :p
 
FatDino, here is my post:

Hallowed Eve said:
Who gives a shit? I mean, really. If you're a pedophile, if you're not a pedophile, who fucking cares?
The people who are investigating me!

I fully intended to sue (past tence), but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came (past tence) illegally.

The name pedophile was posted (past tence) without any proof of such (liable)
An investigation was (past tance) prompted, wasting the time of the investigators and invading the privacy of the subject.
A number for further complaints was posted (past tence) with other subscribed groups notified, which is like screaming "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is none.

It's true I got back in the forums after I was banned (never happened here), but since I could get in the forums, I have to assume I was unbanned, otherwise my E-mail address would still be recognized (another BB, not this one).
 
Hehehehehe!

I voted "yes" for him being a pedophile and I think it tripped some past experience revelations and a whirlwind of self-denial.

Fantasies_only, the laws in this country tell you that you can't possess images of children in sexual situations and the law doesn't require an "object that can discharge" to make that call. They just have to appear in a suggestive manner.

I wouldn't sue anyone. In fact, if I were you, I wouldn't open my mouth. Keep running it like this and you will end up on "Dateline: To Catch a Predator". A show that I am quite fond of.

When I see you on there, I will jump up and down giggling. Enjoy the fifteen minutes of fame.
 
Athena_e19 said:
Hehehehehe!

I voted "yes" for him being a pedophile and I think it tripped some past experience revelations and a whirlwind of self-denial.

Fantasies_only, the laws in this country tell you that you can't possess images of children in sexual situations and the law doesn't require an "object that can discharge" to make that call. They just have to appear in a suggestive manner.

I wouldn't sue anyone. In fact, if I were you, I wouldn't open my mouth. Keep running it like this and you will end up on "Dateline: To Catch a Predator". A show that I am quite fond of.

When I see you on there, I will jump up and down giggling. Enjoy the fifteen minutes of fame.
I wish everyone would drop this already, I wasn't even talking about this site.

The law states sexual pictures of children taken without consent of the parent is not legal.
Virtual kiddie porn law states a child must be present at the time the artwork is conceived (by present I take it to mean based on), or else it is considered artistic expression protected under the first amendment, however most countries (Canada included) do not include this American law.

By the way, the law for real child porn does not go for possession only.
Taking sexual pictures without consent of the parent, or distributing them in any manner will get you hard jail time, otherwise it's a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine and community service, if accompanied by a proposition to a minor or a racy chatlog with a minor.

Lolita pics that show up on your computer can be defended as put there by a third party source, or automatically generated by a search term that is sexual in nature.

By the way, I know the definition of sex I just gave you is not the legal definition, but it makes the most sense.
Even hand to genital contact is not sex, and the only reason why it is for minors is because of 20th Century law, which has shaped sociaties morals.

PS: I would never break the law, and less we forget, I have issues with relationships, health concerns, fear of fatherhood, and I have openly talked of my virginity on multiple occasions.

I think we should get back to the topic:
Hung_Son would like to see a story with a secretly videotaping celebrity incest scenario.
He requested the names of the stars or famous people that should take part in the story.

What about Kathryn Zeta Jones and Lucy Liu?
 
Last edited:
Fantasies_only said:
I wish everyone would drop this already, I wasn't even talking about this site.

The law states sexual pictures of children taken without consent of the parent is not legal.
Virtual kiddie porn law states a child must be present at the time the artwork is conceived (by present I take it to mean based on), or else it is considered artistic expression protected under the first amendment, however most countries (Canada included) do not include this American law.

Even with a parent's consent, it's still illegal. Dumbass.

Fantasies_only said:
By the way, the law for real child porn does not go for possession only.
Taking sexual pictures without consent of the parent, or distributing them in any manner will get you hard jail time, otherwise it's a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine and community service, if accompanied by a proposition to a minor or a racy chatlog with a minor.

See my answer above. No, it's not just a misdemeanor, it's a felony. Dumbass.

Fantasies_only said:
Lolita pics that show up on your computer can be defended as put there by a third party source, or automatically generated by a search term that is sexual in nature.

Nope, that defense is invalid. It's your computer, and under your control. Dumbass pedo.

Fantasies_only said:
By the way, I know the definition of sex I just gave you is not the legal definition, but it makes the most sense.
Even hand to genital contact is not sex, and the only reason why it is for minors is because of 20th Century law, which has shaped sociaties morals.

Sex with a child has always been wrong, no matter what definition of sex you think makes sense, you sick fuck.

Fantasies_only said:
PS: I would never break the law, and less we forget, I have issues with relationships, health concerns, fear of fatherhood, and I have openly talked of my virginity on multiple occasions.

Who cares what your issues are?

You need help, and I sincerely hope that someone in law enforcement is monitoring this site, and your ass gets locked up as soon as possible. You disgust me. My people used to kill those like you who think it's okay to have sex with children. I wish we still did.
 
Last edited:
Who cares what your issues are?

You need help, and I sincerely hope that someone in law enforcement is monitoring this site, and your ass gets locked up as soon as possible. You disgust me. My people used to kill those like you who think it's okay to have sex with children. I wish we still did.
Obviosly you do since you keep responding to me focussed on this topic.
I never said it was ok to have sex with children, and if you look back in this thread, I said this in great detail.

Now please drop this!
 
Fantasies_only said:
Obviosly you do since you keep responding to me focussed on this topic.
I never said it was ok to have sex with children, and if you look back in this thread, I said this in great detail.

Now please drop this!

No, I won't. I see that the possibility exists that you may molest a child at some point, so, no, I'm not dropping it.
 
Fantasies_only said:
I think we should get back to the topic:
Hung_Son would like to see a story with a secretly videotaping celebrity incest scenario.
He requested the names of the stars or famous people that should take part in the story.

What about Kathryn Zeta Jones and Lucy Liu?

He has never posted a story idea thread to this board yet. He posts "who do you want to fuck/jack off to/see in porn" chat threads that should have been moved to the GB or another board the minute he posted them.

He doesn't even come back to "his" threads to offer story ideas after the initial post. Look for yourself if you don't believe me. He won't be back here to reply to you and say "I think that would make a great story". :rolleyes:
 
Hallowed Eve said:
He has never posted a story idea thread to this board yet. He posts "who do you want to fuck/jack off to/see in porn" chat threads that should have been moved to the GB or another board the minute he posted them.

He doesn't even come back to "his" threads to offer story ideas after the initial post. Look for yourself if you don't believe me. He won't be back here to reply to you and say "I think that would make a great story". :rolleyes:
I forgot, that's not really incest.

I know, I just thought I should get it back to what this forum is, and cloudy, if you must know it is an adult hack site for the games The Sims and The Sims 2.
All I did was make a legal error conserning country laws, but all a skin is is a bmp picture, which I believe even a child can draw with Microsoft Paint.
Maybe you should report Microsoft for encouraging child porn pictures with their program?

Now let's drop the whole thing and move on. :cool:
 
This thread reminds me why I sometimes want to work for the FBI. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top