BedtimeStories77
Peaceful
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Posts
- 11,417
Well, the post above mine shows his stupidity. Why the fuck did I ever post here in the first place? lol I really don't need a headache today.
Bye pedo.
Bye pedo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fantasies_only said:I never said that, I'm disgusted by it, and insulted that everyone thinks that of me.
If one masturbates, it does not effect anyone else, nor does an erection.
If one gets naked or watches someone getting naked, it is not physical.
If one fantasizes sexual thoughts about another without actually doing them, it isn't physical.
None of these things are sexual.
Masturbation may invoke a sexual response, but the act itself isn't sexual.
WTF???Fantasies_only said:I never said that, I'm disgusted by it, and insulted that everyone thinks that of me.
If one masturbates, it does not effect anyone else, nor does an erection.
If one gets naked or watches someone getting naked, it is not physical.
If one fantasizes sexual thoughts about another without actually doing them, it isn't physical.
None of these things are sexual.
Masturbation may invoke a sexual response, but the act itself isn't sexual.
Whenever I masturbate, I never have sexual intercourse.cloudy said:Sure you are. That's why recently you were threatening to sue Lit because you wanted to see pedo stories on here.
oh, and btw:
mas·tur·ba·tion: erotic stimulation especially of one's own genital organs commonly resulting in orgasm and achieved by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse, by instrumental manipulation, occasionally by sexual fantasies, or by various combinations of these agencies
So are you saying that it is okay to post a story where it tells you masturbate while fantasizing/watching someone under 18?Fantasies_only said:Whenever I masturbate, I never have sexual intercourse.
If anything masturbation is the absence of sexual intercourse.
I did not threaten to sue erotica.
The term to sue indicates either money or some kind of reward may be gained.
I was not asking to be rewarded, thus a lawsuit against Literotica.com was never mentioned.
Fantasies_only said:I fully intended to sue, but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came illegally.
Anything that penetrates a partner and can (but doesn't have to) discharge fluids within can be called sexual, outside of a girl's finger, sex toys, and other objects.FatDino said:WTF???
Then only penile/vaginal penetration can be considered physical/sexual?
Just what planet are you from?
I said that about something that happened on another site which I say at the end of the same post, so you fuck off!FatDino said:Earlier, you said
I believe I've never used this term before but you've pushed my limits so far I don't even care.
Fuck off!
For real. Get some education, get a life.
If everyone in this theard doesn't care, then why respond?Hallowed Eve said:Seriously, Fantasies_only, why the fuck should we care?
Then you are from some planet that isn't Earth.Fantasies_only said:Anything that penetrates a partner and can (but doesn't have to) discharge fluids within can be called sexual, outside of a girl's finger, sex toys, and other objects.
This includes Via the mouth.
I believe the Freedom of speech only applies in public. This site isn't public property nor the U.S. government's, it's private, therefore, the creators of the site can set whatever rules they want. Take it or leave it. Also, I do believe that it is illegal to even encourage sexual acts with children.I am disgusted by actual pedophilia, and believe the non interactive things mentioned do not harm anyone in fictional stories or drawings, and I would consider it an artistic work that's protected by the first amendment of the constitution.
Yea, why don't you do that here too? Shut up and move on please.My only mistake was suggesting this on a Canadian site, where it is not legal to include artistic works of this type.
I acknowledged that it was an error in judgement for that suggestion a few years ago, and asked everyone to just drop it and move on.
No one is demanding an apology from you. We're asking you to fuck off.Note: I did not apologize for there was nothing to apologize for.
Fantasies_only said:I said that about something that happened on another site which I say at the end of the same post, so you fuck off!
Fantasies_only said:I fully intended to sue, but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came illegally.
The name pedophile was posted without any proof of such (liable)
Now point out please, where did she call you a pedophile? Or are you just too touchy about this because you actually are one?Hallowed Eve said:Who gives a shit? I mean, really. If you're a pedophile, if you're not a pedophile, who fucking cares?
Fantasies_only said:If everyone in this theard doesn't care, then why respond?
Just drop it, like that other site should have.

No, telling you to fuck off.cloudy said:ooooh! What're you gonna do? Sue us?
![]()
![]()
![]()
priceless, just priceless.

FatDino said:No, telling you to fuck off.![]()

Except I know that you won't, I'm too cute and you're incapable of even feigning anger at me.cloudy said:That, my dear, could be dangerous.
(I might rescind my dinner invitation)

The people who are investigating me!Hallowed Eve said:Who gives a shit? I mean, really. If you're a pedophile, if you're not a pedophile, who fucking cares?
I fully intended to sue (past tence), but considering that previous blowup with someone else here (plus the fact I have no money for a trial) I can't do that despite the fact the accusations came (past tence) illegally.
The name pedophile was posted (past tence) without any proof of such (liable)
An investigation was (past tance) prompted, wasting the time of the investigators and invading the privacy of the subject.
A number for further complaints was posted (past tence) with other subscribed groups notified, which is like screaming "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there is none.
It's true I got back in the forums after I was banned (never happened here), but since I could get in the forums, I have to assume I was unbanned, otherwise my E-mail address would still be recognized (another BB, not this one).
I wish everyone would drop this already, I wasn't even talking about this site.Athena_e19 said:Hehehehehe!
I voted "yes" for him being a pedophile and I think it tripped some past experience revelations and a whirlwind of self-denial.
Fantasies_only, the laws in this country tell you that you can't possess images of children in sexual situations and the law doesn't require an "object that can discharge" to make that call. They just have to appear in a suggestive manner.
I wouldn't sue anyone. In fact, if I were you, I wouldn't open my mouth. Keep running it like this and you will end up on "Dateline: To Catch a Predator". A show that I am quite fond of.
When I see you on there, I will jump up and down giggling. Enjoy the fifteen minutes of fame.
Fantasies_only said:I wish everyone would drop this already, I wasn't even talking about this site.
The law states sexual pictures of children taken without consent of the parent is not legal.
Virtual kiddie porn law states a child must be present at the time the artwork is conceived (by present I take it to mean based on), or else it is considered artistic expression protected under the first amendment, however most countries (Canada included) do not include this American law.
Fantasies_only said:By the way, the law for real child porn does not go for possession only.
Taking sexual pictures without consent of the parent, or distributing them in any manner will get you hard jail time, otherwise it's a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine and community service, if accompanied by a proposition to a minor or a racy chatlog with a minor.
Fantasies_only said:Lolita pics that show up on your computer can be defended as put there by a third party source, or automatically generated by a search term that is sexual in nature.
Fantasies_only said:By the way, I know the definition of sex I just gave you is not the legal definition, but it makes the most sense.
Even hand to genital contact is not sex, and the only reason why it is for minors is because of 20th Century law, which has shaped sociaties morals.
Fantasies_only said:PS: I would never break the law, and less we forget, I have issues with relationships, health concerns, fear of fatherhood, and I have openly talked of my virginity on multiple occasions.
Obviosly you do since you keep responding to me focussed on this topic.Who cares what your issues are?
You need help, and I sincerely hope that someone in law enforcement is monitoring this site, and your ass gets locked up as soon as possible. You disgust me. My people used to kill those like you who think it's okay to have sex with children. I wish we still did.
Fantasies_only said:Obviosly you do since you keep responding to me focussed on this topic.
I never said it was ok to have sex with children, and if you look back in this thread, I said this in great detail.
Now please drop this!
Fantasies_only said:I think we should get back to the topic:
Hung_Son would like to see a story with a secretly videotaping celebrity incest scenario.
He requested the names of the stars or famous people that should take part in the story.
What about Kathryn Zeta Jones and Lucy Liu?
I forgot, that's not really incest.Hallowed Eve said:He has never posted a story idea thread to this board yet. He posts "who do you want to fuck/jack off to/see in porn" chat threads that should have been moved to the GB or another board the minute he posted them.
He doesn't even come back to "his" threads to offer story ideas after the initial post. Look for yourself if you don't believe me. He won't be back here to reply to you and say "I think that would make a great story".![]()