Charlie Kirk is our first pro-trans assassination victim — here’s why he won’t be the last

I don't give a crap about Kirk, except that the world is a happier place with one less hate-monger in it, and it is unfortunate that such an awful human being had such undeserving influence, and has been made into a martyr. Nobody gave a crap when Richard Butler or William Luther Pierce passed away- in fact many people were glad. Which is how it should have been for Charlie Kirk, who held similar views to these two.

As for SkyBubble, this is the typical views of someone who lives in a bubble (pun intended) and really hasn't had much social contact with, or experience with, GLBT people. The less exposure and interaction with them, the harder it is to understand their experience. And I'm guessing he probably doesn't WANT to understand it.
 
I don't give a crap about Kirk, except that the world is a happier place with one less hate-monger in it, and it is unfortunate that such an awful human being had such undeserving influence, and has been made into a martyr. Nobody gave a crap when Richard Butler or William Luther Pierce passed away- in fact many people were glad. Which is how it should have been for Charlie Kirk, who held similar views to these two.

As for SkyBubble, this is the typical views of someone who lives in a bubble (pun intended) and really hasn't had much social contact with, or experience with, GLBT people. The less exposure and interaction with them, the harder it is to understand their experience. And I'm guessing he probably doesn't WANT to understand it.


Yes, talk shit about the guy who is unable to respond because he was assassinated.

And you still think it was Kirk who was the hater...
 
I still marvel at the ignorance of the Deplorable who started this thread. In the title of his thread, he refers to the right-wing bigot Kirk as being "pro-trans".
 
Yes, talk shit about the guy who is unable to respond because he was assassinated.

And you still think it was Kirk who was the hater...
Kirk WAS a hater. His message was about hate, just like William Luther Pierce, and just like Richard Butler. (and come to think of it just like you, Mr. O'keffie. If that is your real name.)

The only difference is, the other two were rightly relegated to the fringes of society where they belonged. Kirk, on the other hand, had undue influence and resources to promote his message of hate, misogyny and tyranny.
 
Kirk WAS a hater. His message was about hate, just like William Luther Pierce, and just like Richard Butler. (and come to think of it just like you, Mr. O'keffie. If that is your real name.)

The only difference is, the other two were rightly relegated to the fringes of society where they belonged. Kirk, on the other hand, had undue influence and resources to promote his message of hate, misogyny and tyranny.

When you include this kind of fake crap it cheapens the rest of your message until it becomes just as unbelievable as the inanities you post about me and other forum members. It also shows how unhinged you are and out of touch with reality.

It's actually so obvious I don't really need to point it out.

As for Charlie Kirk, he set the stage for people to come talk to him and exchange ideas. That's not a message of hate but one of inclusivity.

The real message of hate was from the leftist ideologue who assassinated him. The guy who supported the same causes and narrative you espouse so virulently. The narrative that spreads violence everywhere it goes.
 
Back
Top