LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Climate Change Will Turn Women Into Prostitutes

Isn't it funny how if there is a (D) behind the name no one gives it a second thought but if someone has a (R) it gets emblazend all over the news as to how (insert favorite racist, bigotted, desparaging insult) they are..
 
mark_j said:
Isn't it funny how if there is a (D) behind the name no one gives it a second thought but if someone has a (R) it gets emblazend all over the news as to how (insert favorite racist, bigotted, desparaging insult) they are..
Click to expand...

yes, funny:rolleyes:
 
The people over there at Faux News, #1 in Cable bee tee dubs, love to try and throw Democrats around... so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
 
AllyRose said:
The people over there at Faux News, #1 in Cable bee tee dubs, love to try and throw Democrats around... so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

try not to debase yourself more then you have
 
Originally Posted by AllyRose View Post
You certainly can, but that website would never be miles' go-to source.


Oh, I get it. Because it was on Breitbart it isn't true. :rolleyes:

What are your "go to" sources?
 
miles said:
Originally Posted by AllyRose View Post
You certainly can, but that website would never be miles' go-to source.


Oh, I get it. Because it was on Breitbart it isn't true. :rolleyes:

What are your "go to" sources?
Click to expand...

Depends on what's being discussed.

Politifact for quick references to statements and quotes, and I'll rummage through JSTOR for academic reports and then continue on from there.
 
If you think I run to clips of The Daily Show and religiously check MSNBC... you're sorely mistaken.
 
miles said:
Originally Posted by AllyRose View Post
You certainly can, but that website would never be miles' go-to source.


Oh, I get it. Because it was on Breitbart it isn't true. :rolleyes:

What are your "go to" sources?
Click to expand...

You can't abide the actual government source. Breitbart tells you what you need to be upset about. :rolleyes:

This is one of the reasons everyone laughs at you.
 
AllyRose said:
If you think I run to clips of The Daily Show and religiously check MSNBC... you're sorely mistaken.
Click to expand...

So your educated... and yet you defend or maybe even support that wordy, worthless piece of shit proposed "legislation?"

And have the gaul to criticize anyone who makes fun of it? Really?
 
contrifan32 said:
So your educated... and yet you defend or maybe even support that wordy, worthless piece of shit proposed "legislation?"

And have the gaul to criticize anyone who makes fun of it? Really?
Click to expand...

Let's see what the resolution proposes...

1) recognizes the disparate impacts of climate change on
women and the efforts of women globally to address climate
change;​
Climate change impacts more than just women, but in developing nations where more than 50% of the workforce is female... it's important to address that issue particularly.

(2) encourages the use of gender-sensitive frameworks in
developing policies to address climate change, which account
for the specific impacts of climate change on women;​
I'd certainly like to live in a world where we don't need gender-sensitive frameworks, but at one point in time "all Men" was taken to be "all white, property-owning Men".

(3) recognizes the need for balanced participation of men
and women in climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts,
including in governance positions;​
Pretty self-explanatory.

(4) affirms its commitment to support women who are
particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts to prepare
for, build their resilience, and adapt to those impacts,
including a commitment to increase education and training
opportunities for women to develop local resilience plans to
address the effects of climate change;​

Ah yes... I see the problem. An edumicated womuhn is a bad womuhn.

Do you want me to continue?

:rolleyes:
 
aside from the FACT that climate change is BS

this, recognizes the disparate impacts of climate change on
women and the efforts of women globally to address climate
change; is BEE ESSS
 
AllyRose said:
Let's see what the resolution proposes...

1) recognizes the disparate impacts of climate change on
women and the efforts of women globally to address climate
change;​
Climate change impacts more than just women, but in developing nations where more than 50% of the workforce is female... it's important to address that issue particularly.

(2) encourages the use of gender-sensitive frameworks in
developing policies to address climate change, which account
for the specific impacts of climate change on women;​
I'd certainly like to live in a world where we don't need gender-sensitive frameworks, but at one point in time "all Men" was taken to be "all white, property-owning Men".

(3) recognizes the need for balanced participation of men
and women in climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts,
including in governance positions;​
Pretty self-explanatory.

(4) affirms its commitment to support women who are
particularly vulnerable to climate change impacts to prepare
for, build their resilience, and adapt to those impacts,
including a commitment to increase education and training
opportunities for women to develop local resilience plans to
address the effects of climate change;​

Ah yes... I see the problem. An edumicated womuhn is a bad womuhn.

Do you want me to continue?

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So this is ammunition for the new and improved "war on women" campaign? After all, women are the only ones effected by global warming... no wait...its called climate change now right?:rolleyes:
 
contrifan32 said:
So this is ammunition for the new and improved "war on women" campaign? After all, women are the only ones effected by global warming... no wait...its called climate change now right?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I'd just like to point out that you were the first one to cry about the "war on women" campaign, and in my post I said that women weren't the only ones impacted by cultural and climate issues.

:rolleyes:
 
Perhaps you should dress up in a skirt and wig and go stand on a street corner in Cambodia and tell people you're fifteen... then you might get a sense for what girls really go through.

Of course... you'd run the risk of getting hit on by Busybody.
 
AllyRose said:
Perhaps you should dress up in a skirt and wig and go stand on a street corner in Cambodia and tell people you're fifteen... then you might get a sense for what girls really go through.
Click to expand...

And you think some piss poor worded "legislations" is going to change the situations for fifteen year old girls in Cambodia?

You are the true illustrations of a "progressive!"

Contrats!
 
AllyRose said:
Perhaps you should dress up in a skirt and wig and go stand on a street corner in Cambodia and tell people you're fifteen... then you might get a sense for what girls really go through.
Click to expand...

Do you mean getting laughed at? Because that would be the response from most people.
 
contrifan32 said:
And you think some piss poor worded "legislations" is going to change the situations for fifteen year old girls in Cambodia?

You are the true illustrations of a "progressive!"

Contrats!
Click to expand...

So until youdecide that legislation is perfect... and I'd love to hear just what your solution is... we shouldn't make any attempts at all?

Brilliant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rotadom
Dem Star Jasmine Crockett Thumps Trump
2
Replies
43
Views
1K
briancamdudetenger2018
B
B
Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
2
Replies
29
Views
971
HumpDayHoratio
HumpDayHoratio
R
Anyone here bothered to read....
Replies
9
Views
225
butters
butters
SkyBubble
Democrats Pretend to Be for Free Speech: NOPE
2 3
Replies
60
Views
1K
YDB95
YDB95
P
Will poetry and poets ever again be important?
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Politruk
P
Back
Top