Court of International Trade kicks Trump in the taco.

[Lazaran]

This is a stay based on the obvious Appeals Court finding that Trump was likely to succeed on the merits and the Trade Court was in error. It's over, your handwringing aside. read the second sentence of (2)

There is NO “second sentence of (2)”, Rightard. “(2)” is one continuous sentence.

and the warning contained in (3).

There was NO “warning contained in (3)”, Rightard. “(3)” was standard protocol.

It's over, The Trade Courts ruling was a catalog of errors. Go back and ask ChatGPT to analyze those two findings.

It’s obvious Rightard uses “ScatGPT” for their bullshit narratives.



Rightard



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[dmallord]

@Rightguide needs a new guide rule. The one he uses is worn out. He also probably needs to see an ophthalmologist.

How can he get corrected so many times in one thread, again, and still be so obstinate? [Rhetorical right, I know.]