Do you trust Hillary Clinton?

And, is it an issue.

All politicians are untrustworthy. I think it isn't very likely that Hillary will win, I think she's the candidate they're strolling out to make it look like they have people who are competitive. Obama has not done as well his last term, and party switching is virtually inevitable after a two term president, so the democratic Party is trotting out a candidate who couldn't win her own primary in 2008 (when she was politically relevant having just had a successful term as governer) now that she is less so (Resigned as SecState admidst controversy, hasn't done anything beyond speaking engagements for the past year). The reason they are doing this is because they aren't expecting to win, so they're saving the shining stars of the party for 2016.
 
Of course. He's a Republican. Too bad they aren't devoting the same energy towards exposing The Hildabeast.

He's being torn apart by Republicans, you fucking retard.
 
All politicians are untrustworthy. I think it isn't very likely that Hillary will win, I think she's the candidate they're strolling out to make it look like they have people who are competitive. Obama has not done as well his last term, and party switching is virtually inevitable after a two term president, so the democratic Party is trotting out a candidate who couldn't win her own primary in 2008 (when she was politically relevant having just had a successful term as governer) now that she is less so (Resigned as SecState admidst controversy, hasn't done anything beyond speaking engagements for the past year). The reason they are doing this is because they aren't expecting to win, so they're saving the shining stars of the party for 2016.

Bullshit. Right now she could beat anyone the GOP have in the race.
 
Bullshit. Right now she could beat anyone the GOP have in the race.

I don't think so. I know a lot of independents and most of them dislike her. Whilst it's been proven that political scandals don't really hurt presidential runs, the evidence is there, she hasn't done well politically on that stage.

Now it's possible that she will win, but very unlikely. in the past 50 years, we have had only ONE president from the same party elected after a two term president from that party, and that was carrying the goodwill (earned or not) from ending the Cold War. Without a post-war situation you don't see that... So it's not likely at this juncture she'll win.

I dislike her personally, and for her stance on a few issues. And I'm an independent, fuck I've voted democratically in the past two presidential elections. Who she was running against would matter, but I will say this, there are currently running republican candidates whom I would choose over her (at present, when the actual campaign starts we'll see)
 
I don't think so. I know a lot of independents and most of them dislike her. Whilst it's been proven that political scandals don't really hurt presidential runs, the evidence is there, she hasn't done well politically on that stage.

Now it's possible that she will win, but very unlikely. in the past 50 years, we have had only ONE president from the same party elected after a two term president from that party, and that was carrying the goodwill (earned or not) from ending the Cold War. Without a post-war situation you don't see that... So it's not likely at this juncture she'll win.

I dislike her personally, and for her stance on a few issues. And I'm an independent, fuck I've voted democratically in the past two presidential elections. Who she was running against would matter, but I will say this, there are currently running republican candidates whom I would choose over her (at present, when the actual campaign starts we'll see)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Clinton wins against every single GOP candidate. Every. Single. One.
 
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Clinton wins against every single GOP candidate. Every. Single. One.

Who wins one and a half years prior is about as relevant as which of them had fish for dinner. None of them have even started campaigning... Ergo it doesn't matter yet, and Clinton is the only one with name recognition, so who do you think the 50 year olds who still own landline phones to get polled are going to say they'd vote for?

Edit: And it's possible she will win, I just doubt it. My gut and my research (two term presidents) are very much backing this feeling. And her results AFTER campaigning in 2008 also very strongly back my gut and my research. So I imagine she'll lose. the primaries aren't even for months any poll data right now will be irrelevant in potentially days.
 
Who wins one and a half years prior is about as relevant as which of them had fish for dinner. None of them have even started campaigning... Ergo it doesn't matter yet, and Clinton is the only one with name recognition, so who do you think the 50 year olds who still own landline phones to get polled are going to say they'd vote for?

Edit: And it's possible she will win, I just doubt it. My gut and my research (two term presidents) are very much backing this feeling. And her results AFTER campaigning in 2008 also very strongly back my gut and my research. So I imagine she'll lose. the primaries aren't even for months any poll data right now will be irrelevant in potentially days.

Poll data are irrelevant but your gut has spoken. Got it.
 
Not as much as I do Bernie Sanders, but so much more than any in the Clown Car GOP!
 
Poll data are irrelevant but your gut has spoken. Got it.

If the election were tomorrow, your poll data would be relevant, it isn't now. This is before the campaign over a year till the election. The campaign will cause that data to shift, and polls will shift to reflect that. Right now Hillary is the only one getting any media coverage, that will change, right now Hillary is the only one with name recognition.

I also mentioned her prior performance campaigning at a national level, she lost badly, with more money. That's hard to do in a campaign, so we're seeing that she doesn't perform well (or has not historically) in an actual campaign, we're so far out from that though it's not even funny.
 
Back
Top