Does Anyone Remember Eric Ciaramella?

"Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.

But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
Nope. The House record cannot be changed.
 
"Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.

But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?
 
Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?
An accurate record would record Trump WAS impeached.

It would also record that he deserved it. NOTHING has come out to cast any doubt on that.
 
The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
You still cannot point to a single thing in that declassified evidence that reflects the slightest dishonesty on the Dems' part.
 
The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
Hark at the proven liar attempting to take 'the moral high ground'....

You never have explained why you so frequently lied have you Whiteguide, prefering to pretend it never happened, that no-one knows.

Liar / moral coward / moral high ground.
Spot the odd one out.
 
Last edited:
You can't because it does not exist. The Dems did nothing dishonest in connection with Trump's first impeachment -- nothing at all. AND YOU KNOW IT.
Yes they did, they lied about everything. None of it was true. It was a conspiracy, the prosecution of which is now moving forward before a grand jury.
 
Yes they did, they lied about everything. None of it was true.

The President withheld appropriated military aid to Ukraine in order to get dirt on his political opponent.

Factually true and proven during the impeachment
 
WTF?! Trump never made that call to Zelenskyy?!
Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.
 
I googled "trump first impeachment declassified evidence" and NOT ONE non-bullshit site is showing the slightest interest.
 
Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.
What Trump was accused of was trying to condition military aid on Zelenskyy's cooperation in smearing Biden.

He did NOT do that?
 
Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.
He didn't lie during testimony.
 
The President withheld appropriated military aid to Ukraine in order to get dirt on his political opponent.

Factually true and proven during the impeachment
He broke no law. The charges were bogus and conviction on the phony charges failed. But as Obama et al planned, they were good enough to convince the likes of you.
 
Back
Top