ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 72,695
Nope. The House record cannot be changed."Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.
But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. The House record cannot be changed."Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.
But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
I suppose it can be if the House votes for it.Nope. The House record cannot be changed.
Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?"Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.
But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
An accurate record would record Trump WAS impeached.Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?
Because they were already accurate.Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?
Congressional record cannot be modified.Why can’t historical records be modified to reflect accuracy?
trump was justly impeached following his gangster phone call to Zelensky.I didn't say it should. It should remain as a testament to the anti-American corruption of the Democrat Party.
A swing and a whiff, lolThe now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
You still cannot point to a single thing in that declassified evidence that reflects the slightest dishonesty on the Dems' part.The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
Hark at the proven liar attempting to take 'the moral high ground'....The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
Yes I can. You can't because you're illiterate.You still cannot point to a single thing in that declassified evidence that reflects the slightest dishonesty on the Dems' part.
You can't because it does not exist. The Dems did nothing dishonest in connection with Trump's first impeachment -- nothing at all. AND YOU KNOW IT.Yes I can. You can't because you're illiterate.
"Yes I can but you can't"...Yes I can. You can't because you're illiterate.
Yes they did, they lied about everything. None of it was true. It was a conspiracy, the prosecution of which is now moving forward before a grand jury.You can't because it does not exist. The Dems did nothing dishonest in connection with Trump's first impeachment -- nothing at all. AND YOU KNOW IT.
WTF?! Trump never made that call to Zelenskyy?!Yes they did, they lied about everything. None of it was true. It was a conspiracy, the prosecution of which is now moving forward before a grand jury.
Yes they did, they lied about everything. None of it was true.
Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.WTF?! Trump never made that call to Zelenskyy?!
What Trump was accused of was trying to condition military aid on Zelenskyy's cooperation in smearing Biden.Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.
He didn't lie during testimony.Yes, but Ciaramella lied about what he testified to hearing on that call. Trump broke no law in that call to Zelensky as the now declassified intel proves.
He broke no law. The charges were bogus and conviction on the phony charges failed. But as Obama et al planned, they were good enough to convince the likes of you.The President withheld appropriated military aid to Ukraine in order to get dirt on his political opponent.
Factually true and proven during the impeachment
Yes he did. Go back and read the now declassified intel.He didn't lie during testimony.
He wasn't required to break a law.He broke no law.
He withheld allocated military equipment in order to get dirt on his political opponent.The charges were bogus and conviction on the phony charges failed. But as Obama et al planned, they were good enough to convince the likes of you.
I have.Yes he did. Go back and read the now declassified intel.
Like somewhere we can read it -- but link some CREDIBLE source, NOT justthenews or the NY Post or Washington Examiner.Yes he did. Go back and read the now declassified intel.
Doesn't matter. Impeachable offenses are WHATEVER Congress decides they are.He broke no law.