LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Does Anyone Remember Eric Ciaramella?

HisArpy said:
I would like to see the Vindman's get charged, convicted and executed for treason.
Click to expand...
My sentiments exactly. Courts martial, convicted and busted down to an E-1 then dishonorably discharged followed up with criminal charges by the DOJ as a civilian.
 
icanhelp1 said:
My sentiments exactly. Courts martial, convicted and busted down to an E-1 then dishonorably discharged followed up with criminal charges by the DOJ as a civilian.
Click to expand...
That would be laughed out of any court civilian or military. There can be no treason in whistleblowing, nor in honest testimony.
 
Rightguide said:

Impeachment Bombshell: Secret memos expose Ukraine accuser’s bias, hearsay, and false claim​

By John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy
Published: April 12, 2026 10:20pm
Updated: April 12, 2026 11:15pm

The new memos declassified by Tulsi Gabbard were not available to the public during the 2019 impeachment trial.

The U.S. intelligence watchdog developed derogatory evidence about the CIA analyst who prompted the 2019 Ukraine-focused impeachment against Donald Trump, including that he submitted false information in his whistleblower complaint, offered hearsay to support his allegations and had the "potential for bias," according to newly declassified memos that were kept from Americans during the failed bid by Democrats to remove the president from office six years ago.

The documents declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at the request of Just the News provide a starkly different portrait of the alleged whistleblower whose name and face were never shown to the public and whose lawyerly written letter accusing Trump of hijacking Ukraine policy for political gain was heralded by Democrats to launch impeachment proceedings.

Investigators for the Intelligence Community Inspector General documented several concerns about the Trump accuser's political motives, noting he admitted he was a "registered Democrat" who had worked closely with Joe Biden on Ukraine issues and who disliked some of the conservative figures in the president's orbit, the memos show.

The investigators also elicited an apology from the Trump accuser for misleading the probe and were acutely aware his allegations were based solely on second- and third-hand accounts about what Trump was alleged to have said and done.

“I do not have direct knowledge of private comments or communications by the President,” the alleged whistleblower, who claimed Trump improperly tried to pressure Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate Hunter Biden, admitted in his initial August 2019 intake form.

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...ecret-memos-expose-whistleblower-bias-hearsay

It's a long article but it shows why Adam Schiff needs to be removed from the Senate, prosecuted, and put in prison. It also proves that I and others were right so many years ago about an asshole named Eric Ciaramella.
Click to expand...
I vaguely remember back in the day how Eric Ciaramella was outed back then for using hearsay evidence. To this day I don’t understand why he wasn’t prosecuted along with the Vindminds.
 
Rightguide said:

Alan Dershowitz: Trump could move to expunge 2019 impeachment after release of bombshell evidence​

"It's never been done. I don't see any reason why it couldn't be done," the famed law professor told Just the News.

https://go.ezodn.com/utilcave_com/ezoicbwa.png

Famed Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz says he believes President Donald Trump could have grounds to expunge his 2019 impeachment in the House after bombshell new evidence revealed the intelligence community failed to disclose that his main accuser had the potential for bias, made a false statement and only had hearsay to back up his allegations.

Dershowitz, a Democrat at the time who worked to defend Trump at the impeachment trial that ended in the president's acquittal, said it would be "an interesting, novel approach" for Trump to go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who presided over the case, or Congress and ask for the impeachment to be reversed because the defense team was denied the right to confront his accusers with exculpatory evidence.

"It's never been done. I don't see any reason why it couldn't be done," Dershowitz said during an interview Monday night on the Just the News, No Noise television show. "Impeachment is a quasi-judicial procedure, whether you have to go back to Congress and ask them to expunge it or go to the courts.

"But I have to tell you one thing, history will expunge it already based on your work, because what you've done is you've created so much doubt about the credibility of the main accuser that it's hard for anybody to sit back now and say that was a just, a just impeachment, but I don't know that there's going to be any remedy," he added. "Maybe we should try to create one."

Just the News reported Sunday night that the U.S. intelligence watchdog developed derogatory evidence about the CIA analyst who prompted the 2019 Ukraine-focused impeachment, including that he submitted false information in his whistleblower complaint, offered hearsay to support his allegations and had the "potential for bias," according to memos newly declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at the request of Just the News.

More here:https://justthenews.com/politics-po...ump-could-move-expunge-2019-impeachment-after
Click to expand...
No idea whether he could or not.
Presumably he could pass a law forbidding people thinking he is a funny orange colour.
But it wouldn't stop people knowing full well that he is a funny orange colour.
 
icanhelp1 said:
How the fuck do you know. It’s never been tried before. There’s no set precedent to say or do otherwise.
Click to expand...
Because the Constitution has no mechanism to do so.

He can make up some process to "expunge" an impeachment, but it will still be of record that he was impeached.
 
If nothing else, you gotta admire the persistence of deplorables in trying to rewrite history with fanciful boolshit. It’s rather charming in an obsessively delusional way.
 
ll74 said:
Because the Constitution has no mechanism to do so.

He can make up some process to "expunge" an impeachment, but it will still be of record that he was impeached.
Click to expand...
You’re right that the Constitution doesn’t mention expungement, but silence isn’t prohibition. Congress has broad authority over its own proceedings and records. Expungement doesn’t rewrite history; it’s a formal statement that the body no longer stands by the prior action. Impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one, which means it’s ultimately driven by Congress, not a courtroom standard of proof. That also means it can be abused. If members of Congress coordinate around weak, exaggerated, or even invented grounds, the mechanism still functions procedurally, but its legitimacy is open to challenge. The real question isn’t whether it’s possible, it clearly is, but whether the evidence in a given case actually supports the charges or reflects a political objective.
 
Rightguide said:
You’re right that the Constitution doesn’t mention expungement, but silence isn’t prohibition. Congress has broad authority over its own proceedings and records. Expungement doesn’t rewrite history; it’s a formal statement that the body no longer stands by the prior action. Impeachment is a political process, not a criminal one, which means it’s ultimately driven by Congress, not a courtroom standard of proof. That also means it can be abused. If members of Congress coordinate around weak, exaggerated, or even invented grounds, the mechanism still functions procedurally, but its legitimacy is open to challenge. The real question isn’t whether it’s possible, it clearly is, but whether the evidence in a given case actually supports the charges or reflects a political objective.
Click to expand...
The impeachment will never be removed from historical records. He was impeached twice. That will always be true
 
ll74 said:
The impeachment will never be removed from historical records. He was impeached twice. That will always be true
Click to expand...
I didn't say it should. It should remain as a testament to the anti-American corruption of the Democrat Party. The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
 
Rightguide said:
I didn't say it should. It should remain as a testament to the anti-American corruption of the Democrat Party. The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
Click to expand...
There is nothing IN it, so far, to suggest Trump's innocence -- or Dem perfidy.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Congress impeaches, congress can reverse a finding. IMHO
Click to expand...

You are a racist:

icanhelp1 said:
I wonder if it's all those black daddies living by the 4 fs ( find them, feel them, fuck them, forget them ).
Click to expand...

Post in thread 'The real badbabysitter finally revealed..' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/the-real-badbabysitter-finally-revealed.1504564/post-90980000

icanhelp1 said:
blacks have a higher propensity of violence than all races combined.
Click to expand...

Post in thread 'If America Is Racist, Why Have Millions of Blacks Emigrated Here?' https://forum.literotica.com/thread...f-blacks-emigrated-here.1547263/post-93907526

icanhelp1 said:
I wouldn’t even think of walking a predominately black neighborhood, wouldn’t end well.
Click to expand...

Post in thread 'White Officers in Minority Communities' https://forum.literotica.com/threads/white-officers-in-minority-communities.1525284/post-92435953

:)
 
Rightguide said:
I didn't say it should. It should remain as a testament to the anti-American corruption of the Democrat Party. The now declassified evidence will be forever there to showcase the extreme limits of their perfidy.
Click to expand...
The declassified shit does not negate the actions of the President. He attempted to coerce a foreign leader to produce dirt on his political opponent. Hearsay of a whistleblower doesn't change that
 
"Expungement" would mean expunging Trump's impeachment from the House record, I suppose.

But it cannot be expunged from the HISTORICAL record.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Biden/Ukraine Corruption Revealed
Replies
8
Views
115
Wilson23
W
R
Ukraine redux.
2
Replies
43
Views
556
Wilson23
W
Rightguide
Is The New Ayatollah Gay??
2 3
Replies
69
Views
811
DeluxAuto
DeluxAuto
Rightguide
Congress Wants To Declassify Evidence In Phony Ukraine Impeachment Case
Replies
11
Views
329
briancamdudetenger2018
B
SkyBubble
China DID meddle in 2020 presidential vote and intel officials hid it from Trump, unnerving report reveals
2
Replies
42
Views
331
Wilson23
W
Back
Top