Expelling Sharia-Adherent Muslims is Not Unconstitutional

[glamorilla]

If he were he'd be gone because Canadians have morals and we wouldn't put up with that shit, unlike you pedophile loving faggot Americans.

The boys are going to love you in a burqa.

 

[ll74]

we must 86 all islam

That is unconstitutional

 

[SebastianHolt]

That is unconstitutional

I agree that taking out one or ten of them could be subject to prejudice but if we whack them all at one time when it's good for the earth

 

[Philthy_Phil]

The boys are going to love you in a burqa.

You fags are already attracted to me. I'm not interested in pedophile loving homos, sorry about your luck.

 

[glamorilla]

You fags are already attracted to me. I'm not interested in pedophile loving homos, sorry about your luck.

Why would you be interested in me?

Im not 9.

 

[SebastianHolt]

You fags are already attracted to me. I'm not interested in pedophile loving homos, sorry about your luck.

is this why you wear a Burqa so that we can't see you pitching a tent when talking about pedophile

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Why would you be interested in me?

I wouldn't be. Only trumptards like pedo tranny fags like you.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

is this why you wear a Burqa so that we can't see you pitching a tent when talking about pedophile

I'm not American so I'm not attracted to children and I hate pedophiles, so we can never be friends ya pedo creep.

 

[ll74]

I agree that taking out one or ten of them could be subject to prejudice but if we whack them all at one time when it's good for the earth

I didn't mention prejudice.
I mentioned our Constitution.

 

[Wilson23]

I agree that taking out one or ten of them could be subject to prejudice but if we whack them all at one time when it's good for the earth

That would be one-fifth of the global human population.

 

[MasterAnimus]

Expelling Sharia-Adherent Muslims is Not Unconstitutional​

As the saying goes, the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and there are several Supreme Court decisions and statutes protecting America from Sharia law.

Ted Noel | February 13, 2026

eorge Mason University Law Professor Ilya Somin has posted a missive declaring that the “Preserving a Sharia-free America Act” is “manifestly unconstitutional.” We all need a deep breath after that last sentence. It was a mouthful. And Professor Somin is dead wrong.

As Justice Jackson noted in 1949, “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” His key point in Terminiello v. Chicago was that the Supreme Court had gone too far in removing restraints on rioters who attacked policemen. It was essential to “temper [the Court’s] doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom.” “The choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either.”

Justice Jackson was prescient. And he wasn’t just a prophet of the current riots over law enforcement. The presence of doctrinaire Muslims in the US is a direct threat to our existence as a nation of laws. Sharia is the “legal” manifestation of that threat. Students of Islam will point out that “Sharia is not Sharia,” by which they mean there’s not a single, fixed monolithic code of laws—but that’s part of the problem, because it means that Sharia is a theocratic system of laws that depends on the interpretation of the Imam in a specific neighborhood.

We see this sort of divergence simply by looking at the news. The Kingdom of Jordan is Islamic, but it is restrained in enforcing religious laws. At the opposite end of the spectrum is Iran, where, at last count, nearly 40,000 people have been executed for the “crime” of protesting against the Islamic tribal barbarians that rule what could be a wealthy and free country. However, once we get past AI’s reticence to list key issues common to all core Sharia interpretations, a few stand out, and they are completely at odds with American law and values.

More here: https://www.americanthinker.com/art...adherent_muslims_is_not_unconstitutional.html

Let's get on with it.

This right after "you can't punish the cake-maker for refusing gay customers." You guys practice hypocrisy like it's an exercise regime!

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Hey, if you don't want to know, you don't want to know. I can give you the information, I can't force you to read it.

I DO know. If you bothered to read my comment

I've read your comments. Have you?

 

[wallstreetguy]

Expelling Sharia-Adherent Muslims is Not Unconstitutional​

As the saying goes, the Constitution is not a suicide pact, and there are several Supreme Court decisions and statutes protecting America from Sharia law.

Ted Noel | February 13, 2026

eorge Mason University Law Professor Ilya Somin has posted a missive declaring that the “Preserving a Sharia-free America Act” is “manifestly unconstitutional.” We all need a deep breath after that last sentence. It was a mouthful. And Professor Somin is dead wrong.

As Justice Jackson noted in 1949, “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” His key point in Terminiello v. Chicago was that the Supreme Court had gone too far in removing restraints on rioters who attacked policemen. It was essential to “temper [the Court’s] doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom.” “The choice is not between order and liberty. It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either.”

Justice Jackson was prescient. And he wasn’t just a prophet of the current riots over law enforcement. The presence of doctrinaire Muslims in the US is a direct threat to our existence as a nation of laws. Sharia is the “legal” manifestation of that threat. Students of Islam will point out that “Sharia is not Sharia,” by which they mean there’s not a single, fixed monolithic code of laws—but that’s part of the problem, because it means that Sharia is a theocratic system of laws that depends on the interpretation of the Imam in a specific neighborhood.

We see this sort of divergence simply by looking at the news. The Kingdom of Jordan is Islamic, but it is restrained in enforcing religious laws. At the opposite end of the spectrum is Iran, where, at last count, nearly 40,000 people have been executed for the “crime” of protesting against the Islamic tribal barbarians that rule what could be a wealthy and free country. However, once we get past AI’s reticence to list key issues common to all core Sharia interpretations, a few stand out, and they are completely at odds with American law and values.

More here: https://www.americanthinker.com/art...adherent_muslims_is_not_unconstitutional.html

Let's get on with it.

Ilya Somin is a Russian Fifth Columnist and I hope the Muslims string him up first.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

 

[YDB95]

You should pull your head out of your ass and do a little research once in a while.

If you had ever done that, you would know your claim is nonsense. Not only is the free cell phone story baloney, I have posted a detailed explanation in this very forum as to how it started and why it's nonsense. The search function is your friend!

 

[Wilson23]

Ilya Somin is a Russian Fifth Columnist and I hope the Muslims string him up first.

Why would the Russians take an interest in this?

 

[melimelissa]

Why would the Russians take an interest in this?

not the russians!!!

 

[briancamdudetenger2018]

doesnt the the trump right wingers want to expel the sharia law