Experts: Hillary Broke The Law

5. Lit whackadoodles will whine for fours years at minimum.
 
I haven't followed this mess, but has the original poster (and resident legal and constitutional expert) proved his thread title yet?

this says it all


they will make WEEKS worth of issues for

EVOLUTION

RUDY

ROCKS

HAIRCUTS etc


when it comes to real issues on THEIR side

TEH NIGGER IS SGT SCHULTZ
 
Four irrefutable facts about The Hildabeast:

1. Nobody will find incriminating emails
2. She will never be prosecuted
3. She'll continue to deflect the issue
4. She'll be elected President in 2016

5. Miles will effortlessly switch from his weekly bash-Obama diatribe to a weekly bash-Hillary diatribe.
 
Dear State Department: Where is Hillary Clinton’s OF-109 Form?:confused:
 
I don't for a minute believe that none of her "enemies" ever sent an email to her or received an email from her, or had one of hers forwarded to them, in the 4 years she was Sec of state.

So there are only two options. No one cared then, or they are all so stupid they thought @clintonmail.com was an alias for @state.gov

I am betting on the last but the first is very possible also.
 
While I hope we manage to swap Hillary for Warren it is nice that Miles knows he won't live to see the next conservative president and when one does arrive he won't reconize it. This period in history will be remembered poorly. We fucked up.
 
State Dept. Won’t Say Whether Hillary Signed Crucial Records Form, Committed Felony…


Hillary doesn’t have a pen, she was dead broke.:cool:
 
That is the best joke I have heard in a long time. A person from a political party is stating their politician is more intelligent than a politician from the opposing party.
That is nearly as good as the one about a politician from one political party being more honest than a politician from the opposing party.
 
She's Obama's white half, just as stupid, just as full of shit, and sees herself as a Marxist revolutionary. Instead of talking about her real stripes, she talks to us about her phony American Indian genealogy.

Really? Where and when has she talked to us about that?
 
Here's a direct quote from her:

“my parents were very much in love, they wanted to get married, and my father’s mother and father said, ‘No. You cannot marry her, because she is part Cherokee and part Delaware."

Which isn't true....and she's listed on page 1055 of The Directory Of Law Teachers list of "Minority teachers." So how did that happen without her input?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...0b7f568-08a5-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html

Oh, so what you meant to say was that she said it once to a reporter. Got it.
 
She made a public statement that was false concerning her lineage.:rolleyes:

Get that as well.

I saw a shitload of yammering opinions about it, but no proof to the contrary.

Where is the empirical evidenced proof that it is false?

Maybe you should get that as well.
 
I did, open the WaPo link.

Just read it. Nothing conclusive.

Her family verbal lore hand-me-downs over the years versus nobody else's empirical evidence against it means it's still her word over yours.

Better stick with your $500B a day trips to India claims, guy.
 
We’re talking about a woman who made up a ridiculous story about Bosnian snipers (why?) and was too stupid to realize she was sure to be caught. Is it too much to ask that we elect someone smart enough to lie to us better?
 
Back
Top