Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lavender said:Sparky-
Your assertions that anyone that affiliates themselves with a political party doesn't have a brain is offensive and a blatant overgeneralization. Granted, many individuals do not think for themselves. They join the party and vote straight ticket without ever examining the issues or using their brains to make an informed decision.
I think you should be aware from the plethora of posts that I have made on political issues, that even though I align myself with the liberals and the democratic party, I still have a brain. I do think for myself. Just because I happen to agree with the overwhelming majority of the platforms of one party does not mitigate my intelligence in the slightest.
EvilBollWeevil said:The concept of joining a political party is an odd one. By joining a political party you align yourself with whatever the party changes and grows to be. Henceforth someone who used to be aligned with the party of Barry Goldwater is now aligned with the party of Bob Jones U.
COnversely were you a staunch supporter of the Democrats you would have to defend their drive towards the center.
Many moderate members of both parties(And, indeed, the fringe members of both parties) are uneasy with the people they have to ally themselves with.
For me the reason that one shouldn't join a member of a political party is because it reduces the political debate into little more than a game of verbal dodgeball, complete with winning and sides and a sense of elementary school anger and competitiveness. Many of the posts on the board reveal it to be so. Todd has contempt not for left wingers, but for Democrats.
Take the issue of the theoretical "Bi-Partisanship" that was supposed to sweep washington with the restoration of honor and dignity to the white house. The very notion of Bi-partisanship implies that it isn't a difference in ideas that sets Republikans and Democrats apart, it's simply that they play for different teams.
Laurel said:
I agree, yet I don't. I'm not a "club" person, I'm not a "team player" - especially with things I feel passionately about. I get annoyed with the bureaucracy and infighting and gossipy bs that occurs in every organization. I also hate the fact that parties divide people into teams. This leads people to associate themselves with a party based on factors other than what the party actually supports. It also leads to these stupid "all republicans are Fascists" "all democrats are Commies" arguments. Basically, it allows people to "talk politics" without having to do any thinking whatsoever.
At the same time, I feel strongly about certain issues. I want the government to allow me the freedom to make my own moral judgments. I want the government to stay out of my private life. I want the government to set boundaries to keep corporations from causing me and the environment undue harm in their pursuit of profits - just like they set boundaries to prevent private citizens from doing the same. I could decide not to support any political party and try to further these goals all on my own, but how effective would that be, really? I'm one person. I have a limited budget. I have no ties in Washington.
If I truly believe in these issues above all else, then I will support whoever has the power & desire to further these goals. The Democrats are the best fit.
EvilBollWeevil said:I'm kind of with them on the Boy Scouts thing.![]()
Laurel said:
You snot you.You think that public schools should give the Boy Scouts access to their facilities FOR FREE when other groups must pay or else the public schools should have their funds yanked? You're fucking with me, right?
![]()