ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 19,757
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


Does that mean he's going to stop bombing cities and killing and kidnapping children and is not working towards peace?World News
Russia amasses 100K troops in key Ukrainian region Donetsk — sparking fears of large-scale assault
By
Ronny Reyes
Published Sep. 4, 2025, 3:15 p.m. ET
Russian President Vladimir Putin has amassed 100,000 troops on the frontlines in eastern Ukraine — sparking fears that the tyrant is ready to launch a new large-scale assault.
Moscow relocated the soldiers to the area outside Pokrovsk, a key Ukrainian transportation hub in the Donetsk region that Russia has spent the last 18 months trying to conquer, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said.
Kyiv’s allies now fear that the latest push around the city is part of Putin’s strategy to make a big year-end push to conquer the remaining strongholds in the area and fulfill his ambition of capturing the entire Donbas region, Bloomberg reported.
https://nypost.com/2025/09/04/world-news/russia-amasses-100000-troops-in-key-donetsk-region/
It appears the Russian position is to settle this war on the battlefield. In addition, the huge Turkish Baykar drone factory in Kyiv was destroyed on the 28th. It doesn't look good.
It appears he's going to do what I predicted months ago.Does that mean he's going to stop bombing cities and killing and kidnapping children and is not working towards peace?
Neat!
So he got your memo?It appears he's going to do what I predicted months ago.
I said it was likely that if peace talks failed, the war would be decided on the battlefield. It now appears that could be so. Keep your eye on Odessa as well. Russian special forces are said to be in the city. I mentioned months ago the likelihood that Putin would take Odessa which has always been historically Russian, it was established by Katherine the Great in 1794.So he got your memo?
Weren't they doing that a few months ago too when you predicted it again?
There were no peace talks.I said it was likely that if peace talks failed, the war would be decided on the battlefield.
Putin wants all of Ukraine. He won't get it.It now appears that could be so. Keep your eye on Odessa as well. Russian special forces are said to be in the city. I mentioned months ago the likelihood that Putin would take Odessa which has always been historically Russian, it was established by Katherine the Great in 1794.
I don't think he wants to govern western Ukraine. Kiev is indeed historically and culturally significant to Russia. It was the center of Kievan Rus, the medieval state that both Russians and Ukrainians trace their heritage. Historically, it is the cradle of Russian civilization. That said, western Ukraine has historically leaned pro-European and anti-Russian, especially in regions like Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk. These areas were part of Poland, Austria-Hungary, and other states for centuries, contributing to a distinct identity that is resistant to Russian influence. I don't think he wants the headache.There were no peace talks.
Putin wants all of Ukraine. He won't get it.
He said he wants them back in the Republic long ago. He hasn't changed his tune.I don't think he wants to govern western Ukraine.
And yet they keep bombing the shit out of the foreign city.Kiev is indeed historically and culturally significant to Russia.
Ukraine is an independent country.It was the center of Kievan Rus, the medieval state that both Russians and Ukrainians trace their heritage. Historically, it is the cradle of Russian civilization. That said, western Ukraine has historically leaned pro-European and anti-Russian, especially in regions like Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk. These areas were part of Poland, Austria-Hungary, and other states for centuries, contributing to a distinct identity that is resistant to Russian influence. I don't think he wants the headache.
These are all unschooled and therefore dumb replies. Put some effort into it. Meanwhile, show me where he's said he wants all of Ukraine back.He said he wants them back in the Republic long ago. He hasn't changed his tune.
And yet they keep bombing the shit out of the foreign city.
Ukraine is an independent country.
June 9, 2022These are all unschooled and therefore dumb replies. Put some effort into it. Meanwhile, show me where he's said he wants all of Ukraine back.
I said it was likely that if peace talks failed, the war would be decided on the battlefield. It now appears that could be so.
Keep your eye on Odessa as well. Russian special forces are said to be in the city. I mentioned months ago the likelihood that Putin would take Odessa which has always been historically Russian, it was established by Katherine the Great in 1794.
I don't think he wants to govern western Ukraine. Kiev is indeed historically and culturally significant to Russia. It was the center of Kievan Rus, the medieval state that both Russians and Ukrainians trace their heritage. Historically, it is the cradle of Russian civilization. That said, western Ukraine has historically leaned pro-European and anti-Russian, especially in regions like Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk. These areas were part of Poland, Austria-Hungary, and other states for centuries, contributing to a distinct identity that is resistant to Russian influence. I don't think he wants the headache.
Aside from some historical anecdotes, there's nothing quoted there about Putin affirming a desire to govern Western Ukraine, which was only Russian under the old Soviet Union. Today, he claims everything east of the Dnieper, with Odessa included, as Russian. Outside Odessa, that is effectively what he controls to date. But the war’s true trajectory is far from clear, sudden shifts in circumstance or the relentless force of arms and circumstance could yet bring Ukraine entirely under Russian domination.
Putin’s statements claiming that “all of Ukraine is ours” reflect historical and cultural rhetoric, not an official military or governance policy. In reality, Russia lacks the troop strength, administrative infrastructure, and local support to maintain control over the entire country. Current operations are focused on eastern and southern Ukraine, where resistance is weaker and Russian influence is stronger. Western Ukraine remains staunchly pro-European, making full occupation both logistically and politically unlikely. The gap between imperial rhetoric and practical capability makes a total conquest of Ukraine improbable. There is no confirmed Russian policy, force, or infrastructure capable of full governance over all of Ukraine.Putin has said time and time again he wamts all of Ukraine. A ceasefire will simply be a pause before he makes the next attempt. Just like there was pause after Crimean, and a pause after he grabbed Luhansk and Donetsk.
And Putin has a standard policy for dealing with headaches, as he did in Chechyna.It's call genocide. Kill them all and there is no problem. He's been doing exact;ly that in Mariupol - moving in settlers from other parts of Russia who will all need to be expelled.
Lol..of course.Aside from some historical anecdotes, there's nothing quoted there about Putin affirming a desire to govern Western Ukraine, which was only Russian under the old Soviet Union. Today, he claims everything east of the Dnieper, with Odessa included, as Russian. Outside Odessa, that is effectively what he controls to date. But the war’s true trajectory is far from clear, sudden shifts in circumstance or the relentless force of arms and circumstance could yet bring Ukraine entirely under Russian domination.
We know that but Putin doesn't. He wants ALL of Ukraine and the restoration of the old USSR / Tsarist EmpirePutin’s statements claiming that “all of Ukraine is ours” reflect historical and cultural rhetoric, not an official military or governance policy. In reality, Russia lacks the troop strength, administrative infrastructure, and local support to maintain control over the entire country. Current operations are focused on eastern and southern Ukraine, where resistance is weaker and Russian influence is stronger. Western Ukraine remains staunchly pro-European, making full occupation both logistically and politically unlikely. The gap between imperial rhetoric and practical capability makes a total conquest of Ukraine improbable. There is no confirmed Russian policy, force, or infrastructure capable of full governance over all of Ukraine.
Ben Hodges has been wrong on Ukraine more often than he’s been right. A year ago, he insisted retaking Crimea was the key to victory and that bombing Moscow with ATACMS would crush Russia. Reality check: over 37 years, he spent barely 6–7 years commanding troops in the field and the rest chained to a desk, hardly the resume for predicting battlefield outcomes. He’s no better than Petraeus at determining outcomes in the field. For too many years, our problem has been the reliance on an overabundance of Staff College graduates commanding our troops in the field. It's why we haven't won a war in 80 years.UATV Interview with General Ben Hodges - Russia is faltering
US General Ben Hodges, in an extensive interview, reveals the true picture of the war in Ukraine. Strikes on Russian oil refineries are crippling the economy and disrupting Kremlin plans. Ukraine has chosen strategically important targets — oil, railways, command centers — and acts with precision and effectiveness. While China and India help Putin bypass sanctions, Europe is beginning to respond and increase pressure. The Donbas holds defense, and Russian army losses approach catastrophic levels. The general emphasizes that NATO remains the only real security guarantee for Ukraine and the key to a stable future.
0:00 – Intro
0:25 – Ukraine’s strikes on Russian oil refineries and strategic sites
2:00 – Kremlin’s dependence on China and India, sanctions evasion
6:54 – The new “Putin–Xi–Modi” axis and challenges for the West
11:50 – Frontline situation: Donbas, Ukraine’s defense
15:01 – The role of drones in the war and aviation shortages
20:04 – NATO as the only security guarantee for Ukraine
22:06 – Increasing defense investments in Europe
24:01 – End of interview, summary
Ben Hodges has been wrong on Ukraine more often than he’s been right. A year ago, he insisted retaking Crimea was the key to victory and that bombing Moscow with ATACMS would crush Russia. Reality check: over 37 years, he spent barely 6–7 years commanding troops in the field and the rest chained to a desk, hardly the resume for predicting battlefield outcomes. He’s no better than Petraeus at determining outcomes in the field. For too many years, our problem has been the reliance on an overabundance of Staff College graduates commanding our troops in the field. It's why we haven't won a war in 80 years.