ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 19,722
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
THIS ^^^^ is going to be the breaking point. Russia has lost between 15 to 20% of their refining capacity as of this week. These shortages are bringing the war home to the Muscovite's and the denizens of St. Petersburg, citizens who were insulated from the effects of Putin's folly.Putin Lashes Out As Ukraine Destroys The Russian Economy
Russia expands drone attacks to NATO countries despite their own domestic fuel crisis and domestic economy in a state of collapse. This escalation marks a dangerous new phase in the war, with Moscow striking beyond Ukraine’s borders while its industries, finances, and energy sector spiral downward. Ukraine’s resilience and Western support continue to expose the cracks in Putin’s regime. Also featured is the most pathetic ex-member of Pink Floyd, Roger Waters, pushing more verbatim Russian disinformation.
In this video we break down:
Why Russia is targeting NATO members with drones
The impact on European security and global markets
How sanctions, battlefield losses, and strikes on refineries are crippling Russia’s economy
What this means for Ukraine’s path to victory.
The video of Roger Waters mentioned in the video is here.
Russia (and the Soviet Union before) are/were paranoid beyond all belief. Their Air Force was virtually all 'interceptor' based designs. Yeah, they paid lip service to air-to-ground support but just that, lip service. So yeah they had air superiority, and frankly still do, but it is an air-to-air configuration and not quite up to the task before them. ie. taking out Ukraine's air defense systems to they can support ground offenses and execute deep penetration tactical strikes.Russia had complete air superiority - here's why it FAILED
When Vladimir Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine, his forces were expected to topple Kyiv with ease - not to spectacularly fail.
In the latest edition of Battle Plans exposed, Nato planner Philip Ingram picks apart Russia's flawed aerial strategies and outdated manoeuvres.
Taking a deep dive into the beginnings of the war, Ingram explains how the world expected a "blitzkrieg from the havens" on Ukraine when the invasion broke out.
But after Russia bungled the "battle for the skies" many began to wonder how they dropped the ball despite having such an overwhelming advantage.
Ingram says: "Russia's airforce, the VKS, was seen as a modern behemoth, second only to the United States."
"The script was written: 'Total Russian air supremacy in 48 hours.' But that script was torn to shreds."
The military analyst explains how Russia's combat doctrine and aged technology led to them fumbling the aerial battle for Ukraine.
Combing through battlefield footage, he shows instances of Ukrainian drones taking out Russian air defence systems.
Ingram also takes a look at Russian glide bombs attacking Ukrainian positions as part of the brutal air battle.
Russia (and the Soviet Union before) are/were paranoid beyond all belief. Their Air Force was virtually all 'interceptor' based designs. Yeah, they paid lip service to air-to-ground support but just that, lip service. So yeah they had air superiority, and frankly still do, but it is an air-to-air configuration and not quite up to the task before them. ie. taking out Ukraine's air defense systems to they can support ground offenses and execute deep penetration tactical strikes.
Pretty disappointing, huh Vlad?
And that is the tightrope that Trump is trying to walk.Russia had a different strategic concept for the air force as well - it was focused on support for the army and not on air superiority as conceived by the USAF/RAF., as well as interceptors to protect the Russian interior from deep strikes. They've managed that more or less, against aircraft anyhow and they started with effective (sort of) groun support but as the Ukraine air force has gained in strength and equipment they're failing there.....
If they took NATO on it'd be Iran all over again.
And that is the tightrope that Trump is trying to walk.
Let's start with a very basic premise, Vlad is mad. It seems he's exceeded his mental expired by date.
Now, as I see it Trump is playing a 'let's make a deal' game with Vlad while allowing the Ukraine to economically destroy Russia using US intelligence info. Do you really think that all that targeting data is coming from Ukrainian satellites?
This is a knifes edge game being played and the level of Putin's desperation is shown by the drones in Poland. Put yourself in the mind of a mad man. Was that an attempt to force NATO to over react so he would be able to rationalize using nukes?
And I hope you're right.I'm more inclined to think it's an attempt to spook NATO into keeping more air defense systems for themselves and reduce the number bening sent to Ukraine. I suspect what WILL happen is the EU will simply produce MORE air defense systems for themselves AND Ukraine.
I doubt we will see nukes used.
Well, thats a shameBANKING COLLAPSE IN RUSSIA: MASS CASH WITHDRAWALS CONTINUE
Medvedev announces that russia`s 2026 budget will be military, and millions of russians, understanding that the money will come from their pockers, immediately withdrew billions from banks, trying to save their money before the Kremlin collapses the banking system and the economy.
GDP has been collapsing undert the pressure of the war budgets to support the day "special military operation" in its 5th year - now longer than WW2 for Russia (1941-45 for Russia)
2026 will be another military budget for Russia - and a reminder that the entire Russian budget is about the equivalent of the State of Texas
Tragic. Tragic, I say. BwaaahahahahahahahaWell, thats a shame