George Bush is awesome!

Blarneystoned said:
I know the loss was hard to take....Lucifer..you might have a market for those dolls in Eastern Europe...haha...Beijing might really go for them....we could supply the boxes here just like we do for the Barbie dolls here....excellent idea

Blarneystoned

Not that quick on the uptake are you sweetbuns?

<sing song voice> Happy Fun Ball, Happy Fun Ball. Bouncy Bouncity Bounce. </sing song voice>
 
Don't be such a hypocrite sign up now...

MightyZor said:
To answer your question I am seriously considering volunteering for armed forces right after I finish college. If I survive it will look good on my record and I will hae experienced something none of you ever will.

I feel the whole country would be safer with people like you under fire in Iraq....
 
Whoever dredged up this thread, thank you! For real comedy, you can't beat the classics.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Judged on those terms, it’s hard to see how Bush can be seen as anything but a bad president.
That's not true! He's an awful president. Just godawful. The worst! I mean, seriously, how much worse could a president be?

GWB is a bad president to the same extent that my cocker spaniel is a bad Quarterhorse.
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
Well, that all depends.

Are you the sucker, or the suckee?

:catgrin:

I can see how it would be entertaining to watch an inept Leader of the Free World, but only from the relative safety of another planet.
 
Reads?

Reads I see you are still up to the old cut and paste bit....good to know some things dont change.

I see you are flying a British Flag...God Bless London right now...God bless the victims of the bombings an their families and God Bless the rescue workers and responders.

Keep strong,

Blarney out
 
You know who else is awesome? Karl Rove's attorney! I admire his defense in the Plame outing:

Rove didn't identify the CIA agent by name; he just said she was the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

:D

Unbearable Irony of the Day: of all the people for a journalist to be imprisoned for protecting on principle, the worst has to be any member of the Bush administration, who are always so eager to blame The Media.

No doubt, Rove is tickled pink to see a reporter go to jail for refusing to out him for outing agent Plame.
 
Last edited:
Ain't that funny, how the Bushies have retreated into their shell on this one. Bush, who has always said keeping secrets and supporting national security are among his top priorities (gotta root out them Commies), couldn't turn a blind eye to a crime against a CIA employee, even if it seemed likely to have been committed as a means to his own political ends. Now, however, Bush's patriotic stance may end up unearthing the unpatriotic deeds of his closest aide.

Here's an exchange between a reporter and Bush regarding the Plame leak back in October of 2003:

Q: Mr. President, on another issue, the CIA leak-gate. What is your confidence level in the results of the D.O.J. investigation about any of your staffers not being found guilty or being found guilty?

President Bush: First of all, I'm glad you brought that question up. This is a very serious matter, and our administration takes it seriously... I am most interested in finding out the truth... This is a serious charge... We're talking about a criminal action, but also hopefully will help set a clear signal we expect other leaks to stop, as well. And so I look forward to finding the truth."

So here is the defense that this administration will agree with, Rowe is guilty -- but not really -- because he didn't know she was undercover. He exposed her, thinking she was already exposed?

That's actually not a punchline or the funny end to a post, that really is the defense.
 
Seattle Zack said:
So here is the defense that this administration will agree with, Rowe is guilty -- but not really -- because he didn't know she was undercover. He exposed her, thinking she was already exposed?

That's actually not a punchline or the funny end to a post, that really is the defense.
"I thought everybody knew that she was an undercover agent."
 
This just in:

According to an Associated Press poll taken after the bombings in London last week, over 60% of Americans now believe that the Iraq war is not making us safer from terrorism and might even be making it worse.

This has a "Duh" Factor so high, it's off the meter.

How did so many people manage to be so dumb for so long? And why do the rest of us have to share their fate?
 
shereads said:
This just in:

According to an Associated Press poll taken after the bombings in London last week, over 60% of Americans now believe that the Iraq war is not making us safer from terrorism and might even be making it worse.

This has a "Duh" Factor so high, it's off the meter.

How did so many people manage to be so dumb for so long? And why do the rest of us have to share their fate?


Something like 65% said they would vote for a hypothetical candidate running against Bush before Kerry was nominated.

Polls tend to reflect what the people taking them want. Not that they are all or even mostly inaccurate or misleading, but the way you frame the questions makes a lot of difference.
 
I can't like George Bush.
His eyes are too close together. He looks inbred.
And I can't stand the sound of his voice. He makes my butt pucker.


:D

Sorry guys, that's as political as I get. ;)
 
June 3 2004:

Sub Joe said:
I love George Bush, he's part of America's heritage. I especially liked that movie he did with Walter Mondale, "The Sunshine Boys".

Those were good times! Who else is nostalgic for the giddy, madcap months before November 2? Carl Hiassen was still writing columns in the Miami Herald protesting the purchase of recount-proof paperless voting machines from a company whose CEO had written a fundraising letter vowing to do everything in his power to re-elect George W. Bush. Some of us, who didn't know better, still believed there was a teensy chance that the state of Florida would be ashamed of the obvious implications, and would find a way to restore voter confidence. Americans who had read between the lines and worked to keep Bush/Cheney out of office in 2000, were convinced that his incompetent handling of the Iraq war, his repeated contradictions about his motives for invading Iraq, his neglect of post-war Afghanistan, his failure to bring Osama Bin Laden to justice, the stream of incriminating books by White House insiders, the criminal outing of a CIA agent to punish her husband for telling the truth about Saddam's non-purchase of uranium, his shameless rape of the U.S. economy, the prisoner abuse scandal that followed Bush's public disregard of the Geneva Conventions, his failure to address the Halliburton scandal, not to mention his tendency to run with scissors, would make it obvious even to his most ardent fans that George W. Bush was a danger to himself and others, and must not be given another four years to play with the big Tonka toy called the presidency.

We were overly optimistic even when we thought we were pessimistic. I miss those days.
 
Last edited:
EmeraldKitten said:
I can't like George Bush . . . He makes my butt pucker. . .
Never though of that before, but you know, the introduction of butt puckerage measurements could just become an indispensable scientific method of polling in the future.
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
Never though of that before, but you know, the introduction of butt puckerage measurements could just become an indispensable scientific method of polling in the future.

LOL. See? I am worth something.

The new polling method of butt puckerage. I am a genius.
Someone toss me a patent, lol. :p
 
Someone walks up to you in a mall holding a long, stainless steel probe.

"May I ask you a few polling questions? Yes? Good. Drop your pants and bend over so I can insert the measuring instrument."

I think you'd only get polling samples from a small set of Americans. Although polling data would sharply turn in favor of certain sexual practices, I suspect.
 
Back
Top