Goldilocks....Adult Version...

Hallowed Eve said:
Hansel & Grettel were German kids... Why can't a tale involving them have 18 year olds in it? The faerietale (prefering the Celtic spelling of faerie) wouldn't have to be written word for word. That's where an author's creative mind comes from.


However, did SEV ever say He wanted other tales in this thread or did He want ideas to Goldilocks only?
Actually Hansel and Grettel are Dutch (names aren't German), although they are pictured wearing Polish lederhosen.
 
Last edited:
Fantasies_only said:
Actually Hansel and Gretel are Dutch (names aren't German), although they are pictured whearing Polish lederhosen.

Still has nothing to do with Goldilocks though.
 
Shendude said:
Stupid because of the breadcrumbs or because they ate the house?

Because, in the case of the breadcrumbs, something similar had worked previously, and they didn't have anything else to use.

And in the case of eating the house, they were fucking starving to death!
Hansel and Grettle were kicked out of their house to live on their own.
The original version has them running away from poor living conditions and a large amount of housework.

They went through a spooky forest and came upon a cottage of gingersnaps (German/Dutch gingerbread) and candy.

The cottage belonged to a witch, who befriended the children to gain their trust.

She fattened them up with pieces of the cottage, then pushed them in the kilm/oven for her supper.

Grettle found out she was a witch and didn't eat anything.
She was so skinny she could be swallowed whole.
After finding out the witch ate her brother, she took a peek at her spellbook and found a way she could be killed.

At the end, Grettle was swallowed whole, at which point she killed the witch from the inside.

With the witch dead, so was her magic which kept the land from looking as good as it could be.

All the children locked in the witch's cellar were set free, and Grettle and her new friends feasted off the cottage, never to work for adults again.
 
Last edited:
Basically, this is the story of a celebration of the death of a dictator, and the rebirth of freedom.

I think the author was German.
He could be talking about Rasbuten (confidant to Zar).
Oh wait, that was Russa. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Shendude said:
Stupid because of the breadcrumbs or because they ate the house?...
Neither. Stupid because they left home with no attempt to take provisions with them, nor any idea where they were going or what they would do when they got there.

Reasonable in a pair of ten year olds, but not two young adults.
 
I am actually going to reply to one of your curious misapprehensions, but for the last time.
Fantasies_only said:
... I think the author was German. ...
Hansel and Gretel was first collected and recorded by the Grimm brothers in the early part of the nineteenth century. The tale is similar to many children and ogre tales that have been known throughout Europe for many centuries. The version the Grimms collected came from storyteller Dortchen Wild in the town of Cassel.

For a comprehensive version see here.
Fantasies_only said:
... He could be talking about Rasbuten (confidant to Zar).
Oh wait, that was Russa. ...
Григо́рий Ефи́мович Распу́тин also known as Григорий Ефимович Новых was not born until January 1869 and did not meet the Tsaritsa until 1905 so the story cannot possibly have been based on him by a factor of several hundred years.
 
Eve;

Why not combine a bunch of fairy tale's into one glorious orgy? Kind of like how Shrek satirizes a lot of them without being one particularly.

How could you combine Goldilocks, with all the others, in a way that is not necessarily just meaningless drivel i.e.: Goldilocks waved at the three bears and they fucked. Cinderella saw it and she joined in with Prince Charming and then the seven dwarves showed up with erections that were as big as they were and they fucked, etc.

Perhaps there is some important decision to be made about the future of society in the Magic Kingdom. Maybe children's disbelief in fairy tales is causing the world to crumble and they need to find a way to connect with a broader imagination base. One group of fairy tale characters wants to make them take on a more adult role (back to the roots of rape, sex, and virgins) while another group wants to come up with a new story to tell that is wholesome and sweet and applies to a new generation.
 
snooper said:
I am actually going to reply to one of your curious misapprehensions, but for the last time.
Hansel and Gretel was first collected and recorded by the Grimm brothers in the early part of the nineteenth century. The tale is similar to many children and ogre tales that have been known throughout Europe for many centuries. The version the Grimms collected came from storyteller Dortchen Wild in the town of Cassel.

For a comprehensive version see here.
The later version of the book was first written by The Brothers Grim in the 19th or 20th Century (1800s or 1900s).
The original version was first released in both Dutch and Danish languages with a German translation to follow.
The original version (English translation) was written by an independent.

Don't think because I haven't looked at any Websites I don't know what I'm talking about.
I do know the history of the story, just like I know C.S. Lewis took photographs of naked children (also did hand drawn portraits).
Григо́рий Ефи́мович Распу́тин also known as Григорий Ефимович Новых was not born until January 1869 and did not meet the Tsaritsa until 1905 so the story cannot possibly have been based on him by a factor of several hundred years.
See above argument.
The only thing wrong is the country.

PS: I thought it was Grettle not Gretel.
 
Last edited:
Athena_e19 said:
Eve;

Why not combine a bunch of fairy tale's into one glorious orgy? Kind of like how Shrek satirizes a lot of them without being one particularly.

How could you combine Goldilocks, with all the others, in a way that is not necessarily just meaningless drivel i.e.: Goldilocks waved at the three bears and they fucked. Cinderella saw it and she joined in with Prince Charming and then the seven dwarves showed up with erections that were as big as they were and they fucked, etc.

Perhaps there is some important decision to be made about the future of society in the Magic Kingdom. Maybe children's disbelief in fairy tales is causing the world to crumble and they need to find a way to connect with a broader imagination base. One group of fairy tale characters wants to make them take on a more adult role (back to the roots of rape, sex, and virgins) while another group wants to come up with a new story to tell that is wholesome and sweet and applies to a new generation.
Sounds like a porno version of The Never Ending Story.
 
Other than the fact that it is based on a world which could disappear without belief in it, it is nothing like Neverending Story.

I'm kind of getting tired of the dumb, incorrect, and confrontational commentary that you keep adding. What in the world does CS Lewis have to do with anything? And where in the world do you get your source for that? www.HowtoSoundStupidByOverstatingThings.com?
 
Athena_e19 said:
Other than the fact that it is based on a world which could disappear without belief in it, it is nothing like Neverending Story.

I'm kind of getting tired of the dumb, incorrect, and confrontational commentary that you keep adding. What in the world does CS Lewis have to do with anything? And where in the world do you get your source for that? www.HowtoSoundStupidByOverstatingThings.com?
C.S. Lewis is a reference to Alice In Wonderland as another story I know the history of.
The book I have, catalogs the author's biography and activities.

The site I linked does not go into detail of the movie, as I thought it was the official site.
The idea is that Fantasia is being taken over by something they call "The Nothing" (like ripping apart the pages of a story book).
This is because only children can keep the dreams of these stories alive, but now children are losing their hopes and dreams which is destroing Fantasia.

This idea is similar to yours.
 
I understood the Neverending reference to the movie; I did not see how the rest of the plot is related. It is a rather thin connection.

And the reference to CS Lewis made no sense. And what does Alice in Wonderland have to do with him?

I just keep getting more and more confused when you post oddly interwoven topics.
 
Athena_e19 said:
I understood the Neverending reference to the movie; I did not see how the rest of the plot is related. It is a rather thin connection.

And the reference to CS Lewis made no sense. And what does Alice in Wonderland have to do with him?

I just keep getting more and more confused when you post oddly interwoven topics.
I saw the misspelling and corrected it before you posted.

I thought I made my point clear in the last post about the plot of the movie.
No, it is not a thin connection since your initial post made the exact same reference.
 
The connection is understood.

But what does CS Lewis and naked pictures of children have to do with anything and where on earth did you come up with that? And then Alice in Wonderland?

This is my last response to your incoherent ramblings on this thread. Back to topic.

Anything more on Goldilocks and the Three Bears?
 
Athena_e19 said:
The connection is understood.

But what does CS Lewis and naked pictures of children have to do with anything and where on earth did you come up with that? And then Alice in Wonderland?

This is my last response to your incoherent ramblings on this thread. Back to topic.

Anything more on Goldilocks and the Three Bears?
C.S. Lewis is the author of Alice In Wonderland.
This book is a child's tale similar to Hansel And Gretel.
The fact of his sexual fantasies isn't well known to this generation, which was meant to prove my knowledge of these kinds of things.
This fact was gotten from an extensive biography of his life, that was included on my book.
In addition, other Websites will say something similar, only they might say pedophile instead of the correct term, hypersexual (isn't always physical).
This is because they are older articles which don't understand the exact disorder (see Debra Lafave).
 
Last edited:
Shit.

I promised I wouldn't.

Someone please stop me.

I just can't help it.

AIAIEEEEEE!!!!!!

Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!

The author of Alice in Wonderland is Lewis Carroll, not CS Lewis. CS Lewis wrote the Chronicles of Narnia among other things. And his name was Charles Lewis Dodgson, Lewis Carroll was just his pen name. And yes he did take pictures of naked children, but why bring it up!
 
Athena_e19 said:
Shit.

I promised I wouldn't.

Someone please stop me.

I just can't help it.

AIAIEEEEEE!!!!!!

Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!Lewis Carroll!!!! Lewis Carroll!!!!

The author of Alice in Wonderland is Lewis Carroll, not CS Lewis. CS Lewis wrote the Chronicles of Narnia among other things. And his name was Charles Lewis Dodgson, Lewis Carroll was just his pen name. And yes he did take pictures of naked children, but why bring it up!
First of all, I always mix up the two, my mistake.

I brought it up only as something that might not have been known here, not that I like the subject or anything.
I agree the naked human body can be called art, but I disagree on his subject matter.

I also never said anything about the question of real or pen name (worked for bishop in abby).
 
Last edited:
Fantasies_only said:
First of all, I always mix up the two, my mistake.


Athena, I dare you to mention the town Coulor. ;)



Anyway... :eek: ...I do like the idea of mixing "all" (as in, as many as the author wants) of the common faerietales into one sex tale. :) Or, it could make for a fun series of stories by sharing a common link. :)
 
snooper said:
Neither. Stupid because they left home with no attempt to take provisions with them, nor any idea where they were going or what they would do when they got there.

Reasonable in a pair of ten year olds, but not two young adults.
Err, they didn't run away.

Their stepmother nagged their father into taking them out into the woods and leaving them there.
 
Shendude said:
Err, they didn't run away.

Their stepmother nagged their father into taking them out into the woods and leaving them there.
The story has been told and retold so many times in various versions, it is difficult to know what's what.
The original version had the children working for their father and step mother (like a familly owned sweat shop) in poor living conditions.
They soon got tired of this treatment and ran away to fend for themselves.

The stupid thing was the gulibility of the children, after seeing the witch.
The "Too good to be true," saying applies to the gingerbread house.
Although breadcrumbs were brought to find they're way home, it was also stupid to not think about the birds eating the crumbs.
 
Last edited:
I always thought "The Little Dutchboy" was already based on sex.
A dam bursting could be an enormous orgasm with a large amount of cum.
His finger stuck in the dyke, represents a penis in a vagina.

The little boy saving the town, could be about a virgin who's inexperience is enough to turn off any woman (not a good message for us virgins).
 
Fantasies_only said:
... I do know the history of the story, just like I know C.S. Lewis took photographs of naked children (also did hand drawn portraits). ...
That settles it. You are now on my ignore list. It wasn't C.S.Lewis it was Charles Dodgson (nom de plume Lewis Carroll).
 
snooper said:
That settles it. You are now on my ignore list. It wasn't C.S.Lewis it was Charles Dodgson (nom de plume Lewis Carroll).
If you look back in this thread, someone already corrected me, and I admitted that I always confuse the two.

I always thought humans were allowed to make mistakes. :p
 
SEVERUSMAX said:
....3 Bears....being Papa Bear and his two sons Big Brother Bear and Little Brother Bear....not actual Bears, but Bears as in hairy guys....one's cock is too large, one is too small, and of course, one's cock is just right....
this is a really good idea. but do they have to be related?
 
Back
Top