GOP- 'The Joe Tapes may not exist'

When even FAUX says 'you got nothing ...'

Fox News Turns on House Republicans Over Joe Biden Impeachment

Hosts and reporters have pointed out that the GOP has uncovered no evidence to back up their claims against the president.

So far there is no smoking gun.

There is, however, a lot of circumstantial evidence in the form of bank records, business records, checks, emails, internal WH memos, a video taped confession, payouts, and so on.

So there is "something." Whether it amounts to a crime is where the debate comes in.
 
So far there is no smoking gun.

There is, however, a lot of circumstantial evidence in the form of bank records, business records, checks, emails, internal WH memos, a video taped confession, payouts, and so on.

So there is "something." Whether it amounts to a crime is where the debate comes in.
I agree, Reichguide is a liar and a moron who doesn't understand the meaning of evidence.
 
I agree, Reichguide is a liar and a moron who doesn't understand the meaning of evidence.

One decent intelligent individual’s exculpatory evidence is another sick demented individual’s (Derpy) "circumstantial evidence".

Take the testimony of Devon Archer…

That ^ "closed door interview" (and the subsequent "curation" of Devin Archer’s testimony for the public by the "republicans" leading the committee) is definitely the reason "HUNTER!!!" and his lawyer are refusing to participate in another "closed door interview".

Devon Archer literally testified that he NEVER witnessed Joe Biden do ANYTHING illegal, and that Joe Biden NEVER discussed business with him or "HUNTER!!!" in the entire time he knew him.

That ^ was "curated" by the "republicans" on the committee into: "Devon Archer gives damning testimony implicating Joe Biden!!!"

🙄

👉 Derpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
You are really fucking stupid, or you think I am. The bank records and shell LLC's are FACT.

Dumb fuck.
That they are, but they don't show what you are implying they do. Is there ANY links back to the President? So far I (or anyone else for that matter) haven't seen any, so EVERYTHING that has been brought forward in the last YEAR is nothing BUT allegations. While that is the perfect way to start an investigation, allegations can PROVE nothing.

I'll ask the same question I always do: because there has been nothing of substance found to implicate the President in Hunter's business, is it because the investigators are incompetent, or because there is nothing to find?

Choose wisely.

Comshaw
 
Back
Top