Has anyone tried the slightest touch thingy.

has anyone tried this thingy?

  • Have you tried it?

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Should i try it?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • can it hurt me?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • do you think it can do anything ?

    Votes: 2 66.7%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .

lustyem

Really Experienced
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
180
Ok I dont know where to start really . My b/f found this site that sells these electric things , that are supposed to get a woman to a really aroused state and keep her there for as long as she wants . Then it is supposed to only take the slightest touch to make me orgasam .

My question is , has anyone tried this thing and if so did it or did it not do as it claims.

It sends slight electric current up the womans legs to her pelvic area , thus arousing us.

Should i let him try it on me ?

Emma.
 
This came up recently (3 months?) but I can't find the reference. I don't recall if there was an actually Lit member testimony.

However, the theory behind it is realtively sound, and I can speculation as to a mechanism of action. Therefore I'd expect to find a good sized group of women who receive some stimulation from it. As to enough stimulation to hover over the big "O", we need field trials and feedback.
 
Is this the deal that you attach to your ankles and what not? If it is I have read about it. Supposed to work off some nerve channel theory sorda like accupuncture. Everything I've read (to include product reviews) says it's BS. Sounds like it provides a degree of topical stimulation that makes the woman feel and think she's getting more turned on when in reality it is just new sensations and her own mind and her lover that are still doing the trick for her.

Stick to what works I reckon. A dirty open mind and a willing partner. Best combination for orgasm I've ever found...lol.
 
"Reasonable basis in theory" means that the theory allows hypothesi about known things (e.g. nerves) and has some chance of being measured, given the ability to build tools (e.g. some super sophisticated MRI) to get answers. "Reasonable" does not mean "proven".

There is a nerve center at the base of the spine that is a control center for mechanical sexual response in the genitals. There's another thread with a story about a surgeon who, when placing electrodes in the lower spine for pain control, triggered orgasms by stimulating that center.

There are cases where stimulation of nerves passing close to that area also seems to stimulate it in some sort of "cross talk" effect. It isn't dramatic, but it seems noticeable. The nerve in the ankle goes near there, so I'd give it the benefit of the doubt until good trials are done.

There are a lot of arguments about nerve stimulation. Acupuncture or acupressure is one that was strongly debated, and some still don't accept it. Likewise, the G-spot.

Also, the population is not identical in many areas. There are subgroups that when tested as a group show statically significant results that appear to be insignificant in the general population.

If you know how to define the groups (say people who gain weight in the thighs and ass vs people who gain weight in their chest) then you can see things unique to the group (like more heart attacks in the top heavy group).

There's probably a group of people with wiring slightly different than other groups that will see an effect from the device. The next question would be how to identify them before you hook up the device.

My opinion is that are things happen we can not (yet) explain and to deny that they exist due to lack of explanation is not good. How else can they be investigated?
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Limbhugger
Stick to what works I reckon. A dirty open mind and a willing partner. Best combination for orgasm I've ever found...lol.


ooo I like how you think :p but then I've got a dirty open mind hehe
 
wicked woman said:
ooo I like how you think :p but then I've got a dirty open mind hehe

Me too and I'm so willing it almost hurts. But then hurts isn't bad either. *wink* :devil:
 
ReadyOne said:
My opinion is that are things happen we can not (yet) explain and to deny that they exist due to lack of explanation is not good. How else can they be investigated?

By the same token, to take a claim at face value with little to no scientific evidense supporting it is to fall for the old snake oil scam.

The unit in question looks amazing like one of those fat burners that the FDA ordered off the market because of unsubstaniated claims. While I'd be the first person to applaud a machine would you could use to get your mate "in the mood", I'd want to see it tested properly and proven to work under accepted controls.

The website which is selling the device in question mentions no tests, no studies. It just makes claims which I'd want proven before dropping 200 bucks on a gimmick that at best, might not work, at worst, could harm the one person that means the most to me in the world.

BTW, there are people that have used this thing. Here's what one of them had to say about it;

I gingerly removed it from its very intense packaging – which suggested even further that this was the real deal. Anything wrapped so carefully (with bubble wrap!) must be a treasure. I read the instructions and followed them to the letter. I drank the requisite (and included!) electrolytes and then waited the appropriate and suggested time before beginning to put the Slightest Touch to the physical test and apply pressure with my hands.

At first I was confused because part of the literature had stated that the Slightest Touch would arouse you more quickly, thus allowing you to reach orgasm faster and consequently giving your partner a perhaps much needed break. I felt nothing. In fact, I think it’s safe to say I was the opposite of aroused. I felt flat and uninterested in the workings of my fingers. So I whipped out my vibrator and let it have a go. Same result. I was finally able to get aroused, but even then, once I was, it took me much longer to reach orgasm than it has in the past. The orgasm was strong and slightly longer than usual, but hardly what one would expect from such an elaborate set up. I had electronic pads stuck to my ankles that were probably going to give me a minor leg wax. I had pulses surfing through my body whose supposed purpose was to improve my orgasms. I had imbibed brand nameless unearthly yellow colored electrolytes in the interest of sex. Needless to say, I expected more.

The full review can be read here;
http://www.hushmagonline.com/article_page.aspx?article_id=68

Everyone, and I mean everyone, should be skeptical when you read a website that makes claims without any attempt to back them up, especially when it comes to matters of personal health. Its easy to make a claim, hell I could put a website online advertising a special super orgasm/fat burning recipe and get people to send me money even though no such product exists.

I'd also recommend people visit Quack Watch. Its a great website for people looking to find out if that herbal tea is really any good or are they merely pissing away their money.

http://www.quackwatch.org
 
I'm a nutjob but...

anything that involves the use of electrical currents as part of an act in which I also get " wet" isn't something I'm gonna jump into!:eek:

I understand the theory behind it, but in my opinion it's a little far fetched. :confused:
 
Back
Top