Hasan Piker

[ll74]

swallzwells that ends well.

Yah, you get stuck on things.

 

[glamorilla]

Yah, you get stuck on things.

nah. you just don't like to admit democrats embrace communism and islam.

 

[ll74]

nah. you just don't like to admit democrats embrace communism and islam.

I have never said that some have done so nor rejected that some do.
You seem to need to generalize that for the party.

I've always addressed you personally.

 

[glamorilla]

no thanks. "the party" has embraced it for decades.

to paraphrase "everything Democrats touch turns to shit".

piker is a pimple on the ass "the party" has fattened.

 

[ll74]

no thanks. "the party" has embraced it for decades.

to paraphrase "everything Democrats touch turns to shit".

piker is a pimple on the ass "the party" has fattened.

Is this a reply?
.got it

 

[wallstreetguy]

Lots of calls for Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan to distance himself from antizionist streamer Hasan Piker.

It seems like a small thing to do and would dispel a lot of the apprehension Jews have about backing AES in his Senate Run.

He is literally friends with Piker and said he would not fucking distance himself (he is cool, so he curses in front of "candid" cameras on his tour bus).
Your party is firmly with Piker. He is pretty mainstream Dem. The Dems who oppose him are a tiny minority (13 out of 200+ in House and almost none in Senate except for the great Fetterman).
You are sharpening the knife that will kill Jews and Israel. Fine, knock yourself out. Just stay out of my neighborhood.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

You're the Jewish Piker. Mix in a mirror.

What does this even mean? I would have thought you would support Hasan Piker.

 

[DeluxAuto]

What does this even mean? I would have thought you would support Hasan Piker.

It means he's no more racist that you.

You'd have thought that because you're an idiot.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

It means he's no more racist that you.

You'd have thought that because you're an idiot.

Leave your opinion of me out of it.

What is your opinion of Hasan Piker?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Leave your opinion of me out of it.

What is your opinion of Hasan Piker?

I'll tell it in a thread started my someone who isn't a hypocritical racist piece of shit like this one is.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

I'll tell it in a thread started my someone who isn't a hypocritical racist piece of shit like this one is.

We agree on almost every issue except Israel.

 

[DeluxAuto]

We agree on almost every issue except Israel.

Correct. And then you went full on racist and I bounced you.

 

[Chernosoth]

Dems shred their own, crowd has popcorn.

 

[briancamdudetenger2018]

he is not only one of the trump right wing orbit biggest arch enemies

but he is also an arch enemy of the moderate left wingers

and why because of his alliance with the infamous left wing political stable aka group the dsa

 

[RobDownSouth]

Hasan Piker self-identifies as an antizionist. He’s very open about hating Israel.

I see absolutely nothing wrong with self-identifying as an antizionist.
I identify as a staunch antizionist myself.
And yes, I despise the fascist genocidal Israeli government.

That is what good, moral people do.

The problem, as I see it, is that hardcore bigoted Islamophobic haters such as yourself like to conflate "Israel" with "Jews". using the two words interchangeably when they are most certainly not synonyms.

The same with using "jew hatred" as a placeholder for the now-discredited term "anti-semite" (which Zionists expanded the definition of to include anything that hurts or might hurt delicate Jewish feelings, rendering the word irrelevant....if eveything is "antisemetic" than nothing is "antisemetic".

I honestly have no idea who Hassan Piker is but your foaming-at-the-mouth denunciation of the man, coupled with the pearl-clutching of the AIPAC-addicted "centrist" Democrats, makes me think he is doing an excellent job rustling your jimmies.

I gather he is promoting the idea that the insistence of conflating "Israel" with "Jewish" may result in the burning of synagouges in America. If this does happen, and it probably will but I hope it doesn't, the blame will rest entirely upon the shoulders of Zionist extremists such as yourself and Lazaran.

You cannot have it both ways. Zionism is an extremist political faction dedicated to genocide, who hide behind the Star of David as a "flag of convenience" to absolve themselves from any and all responsibilities for their actions.

This is not a "religious" war......this is an ethnic cleansing operation to grab property from other countries.

And surprise surprise surprise, many people have an issue with that.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

I see absolutely nothing wrong with self-identifying as an antizionist.
I identify as a staunch antizionist myself.
And yes, I despise the fascist genocidal Israeli government.

That is what good, moral people do.

The problem, as I see it, is that hardcore bigoted Islamophobic haters such as yourself like to conflate "Israel" with "Jews". using the two words interchangeably when they are most certainly not synonyms.

The same with using "jew hatred" as a placeholder for the now-discredited term "anti-semite" (which Zionists expanded the definition of to include anything that hurts or might hurt delicate Jewish feelings, rendering the word irrelevant....if eveything is "antisemetic" than nothing is "antisemetic".

I honestly have no idea who Hassan Piker is but your foaming-at-the-mouth denunciation of the man, coupled with the pearl-clutching of the AIPAC-addicted "centrist" Democrats, makes me think he is doing an excellent job rustling your jimmies.

I gather he is promoting the idea that the insistence of conflating "Israel" with "Jewish" may result in the burning of synagouges in America. If this does happen, and it probably will but I hope it doesn't, the blame will rest entirely upon the shoulders of Zionist extremists such as yourself and Lazaran.

You cannot have it both ways. Zionism is an extremist political faction dedicated to genocide, who hide behind the Star of David as a "flag of convenience" to absolve themselves from any and all responsibilities for their actions.

This is not a "religious" war......this is an ethnic cleansing operation to grab property from other countries.

And surprise surprise surprise, many people have an issue with that.

Zionism is (and always has been) the belief that the Jews should have a nation in our indigenous homeland. It succeeded in 1948 to the consternation of the Arab supremacists who have been trying to restore their dominion ever since.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Zionism is (and always has been) the belief that the Jews should have a nation in our indigenous homeland. It succeeded in 1948 to the consternation of the Arab supremacists who have been trying to restore their dominion ever since.

That is the older, obsolete definition of "Zionism", circa 1999.

In today's modern usage, "Zionism" refers to Israel's purported "moral right" to kill any people or peoples, for any reason they wish, in any country or in any open seaway, without fear of consequence or retribution.

Thankfully, Iran has shown the way to other aggrieved nations that there IS a way for victims to extract retribution for unilateral Israeli attacks on their sovreign soil.

They've shattered the so-called "Iron Dome" and shown that Israel is not the "invincible super power" it claims to be.

Thankfully, Iran has also shown that there is no need for nuclear armaments needed to punch holes in Israeli defenses. A a phalanx of $20,000 drones and state-of-the-art conventional ballistic missiles can do the job quite credibly.

 

[Chernosoth]

Zionism is (and always has been) the belief that the Jews should have a nation in our indigenous homeland. It succeeded in 1948 to the consternation of the Arab supremacists who have been trying to restore their dominion ever since.

Would you settle for New Jersey? Or Florida. SoCal, where you live. Kansas. There's land all over the world. Antarctica is really cheap because it's really cold, but it will warm up. Planning centuries ahead could lead to a great land deal.

 

[OralAllOver]

Lots of calls for Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan to distance himself from antizionist streamer Hasan Piker.

It seems like a small thing to do and would dispel a lot of the apprehension Jews have about backing AES in his Senate Run.

I'm uninformed. He generalized about how jews in America feel. Other?

 

[OralAllOver]

This is old school hate speech. Russian pogroms. Mississippi miscegenation

 

[OralAllOver]

Hasan Piker self-identifies as an antizionist. He’s very open about hating Israel.

More specific? "I hate Israel?"

 

[OralAllOver]

Geopolitical opinion above my pay grade

1) I take racism and vitriol seriously. Someone telling racial joke? I turn and walk away. No punch line for me. Just how I prefer. Not all are pernicious, but not my thang

2) Saudi A (a family business entrusted with the holy sites) has more light crude than than CPAC has daddies in the closet. Right up on the surface. Easier than stealing. (See, not much low level stealing in Saudi A) Light crude. On the surface. They seemingly have little use for nuclear reactor (managed by Pakistanis?). An accident fouling the holy sites? Leadership dead.

3) Trump fucks over his "friends" and wives worse than enemies. Not knowing this, Gulf states paid proper fortunes to Trump & family.

4): Trump's excursion above Iran fucked the gulf states and hard. Maybe for decades. So, what's a grifter to do? Trump gave "go" to a Saudi A breeder nuclear reactor. I guess Republicans like globalists now. America ain't first.

5) And, obviously, some of this reactor fuel has Israeli intentions all over it. Residents of Israel and those holding it dear are learning, and will learn, a simple truth: cultivating Trump as a friend is nothing less than a historic disaster.

6) Back to anti-Semitic speech. It's a problem. Not remotely, no how, THE problem

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

That is the older, obsolete definition of "Zionism", circa 1999.

In today's modern usage, "Zionism" refers to Israel's purported "moral right" to kill any people or peoples, for any reason they wish, in any country or in any open seaway, without fear of consequence or retribution.

Thankfully, Iran has shown the way to other aggrieved nations that there IS a way for victims to extract retribution for unilateral Israeli attacks on their sovreign soil.

They've shattered the so-called "Iron Dome" and shown that Israel is not the "invincible super power" it claims to be.

Thankfully, Iran has also shown that there is no need for nuclear armaments needed to punch holes in Israeli defenses. A a phalanx of $20,000 drones and state-of-the-art conventional ballistic missiles can do the job quite credibly.

Zionism hasn’t changed its definition. It just became cool on the left to hate Jews and support radical Islam.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Would you settle for New Jersey? Or Florida. SoCal, where you live. Kansas. There's land all over the world. Antarctica is really cheap because it's really cold, but it will warm up. Planning centuries ahead could lead to a great land deal.

The Jews have lived continuously in Israel for thousands of years. Why should they move?

 

[Lazaran]

Zionism hasn’t changed its definition. It just became cool on the left to hate Jews and support radical Islam.

I see it as a continuation / expansion of the Russian propaganda campaign from 2015 - 2016.

It is ALL connected.





We. Told. Them. So.