Help!

Most men think the sole fact they have a penis is so stunningly amazing that what it looks like doesnt matter at all.
I just think some men, though visual creatures, have not cultivated a sense or ability to recognize what is pleasing to the eyes of others.
 
Why is it that boys of lit that want to flash their little winkies in their AVs so often have grotesque looking ones?

And no, I am not sure how I know what is attractive in gnarled, discolored, hairy, little flaccid wee-wees.

They don't know it's grotesque if it's the only one they've seen.
 
Please someone tell me how to turn my private messages on???

This genius post came down from the heavens! Quick, thank your guardian angel!


OP might not have appreciated it, but I found all the comments rather amusing.

Now, how do I get I get an avatar pic on here? I think y'all need to see my bald kissy face :D

Grats, you reach 100 posts and now it's time to show us your moobs!
 
Last edited:
They don't know it's grotesque if it's the only one they've seen.

That actually makes sense. I have had bizzaro-world conversations a time or too with guys that squick at the presence of a penis in porn.

Every the curious sort, I have asked, "So you stick to lesbian porn?"

"No, but I just try to keep my focus away from that."

I was talking to a hedonistic friend of mine around my age...I don't know how it came up other than we know some of the same girls, but he stated he could not handle being in the same room with another male, even if for the sake of discussion he was well and truly occupied clear at the other end of the girl.

I am well aware that (generalizing) that women seem less aroused from visual cues, and the cues that DO arouse them tend to not be dis-embodies external genitals...

It didn't occur to me that this is a better question for a gay or bi guy. (Some) straight guys find just boobs or a gyno-shot with no context stimulating... I wonder if it is common for some gay man being CIS gendered male, might also have strong arousal to visual cues, even if it is disembodied penis pics?

I realize mileage may vary...I tend to prefer a lot of context in my porn, for example.
 
That actually makes sense. I have had bizzaro-world conversations a time or too with guys that squick at the presence of a penis in porn.

Every the curious sort, I have asked, "So you stick to lesbian porn?"

"No, but I just try to keep my focus away from that."

I was talking to a hedonistic friend of mine around my age...I don't know how it came up other than we know some of the same girls, but he stated he could not handle being in the same room with another male, even if for the sake of discussion he was well and truly occupied clear at the other end of the girl.

I am well aware that (generalizing) that women seem less aroused from visual cues, and the cues that DO arouse them tend to not be dis-embodies external genitals...

It didn't occur to me that this is a better question for a gay or bi guy. (Some) straight guys find just boobs or a gyno-shot with no context stimulating... I wonder if it is common for some gay man being CIS gendered male, might also have strong arousal to visual cues, even if it is disembodied penis pics?

I realize mileage may vary...I tend to prefer a lot of context in my porn, for example.

I am not 100% sure what you are asking, but if the question is whether or not gay men respond strongly to visual cues! the answer is that gay men are, before all, men. So, yes, visual stimulation is a big deal. I think the one piece you may be missing is that gay men, generally, are aroused by male bodies in toto, and for some, their focus may be on a guys biceps, or abs or shoulders as much or more than on their cocks.
 
I am not 100% sure what you are asking, but if the question is whether or not gay men respond strongly to visual cues! the answer is that gay men are, before all, men. So, yes, visual stimulation is a big deal. I think the one piece you may be missing is that gay men, generally, are aroused by male bodies in toto, and for some, their focus may be on a guys biceps, or abs or shoulders as much or more than on their cocks.


Yes that is what I was asking...my working theory on this is that external genitals are just silly. Especially out of context. I became enamored with mine 30 some years ago, and I have yet to find many situations other than as Steve Martin put it "fulfilling it's purpose." where it doesn't look ridiculous flopping around or bobbing and weaving like a proboscis.

Perhaps supine, preferably draped in a sheet is it's best look.

I think the bolded bit would sum up the eye-candy side for most women as well?
 
Yes that is what I was asking...my working theory on this is that external genitals are just silly. Especially out of context. I became enamored with mine 30 some years ago, and I have yet to find many situations other than as Steve Martin put it "fulfilling it's purpose." where it doesn't look ridiculous flopping around or bobbing and weaving like a proboscis.

Perhaps supine, preferably draped in a sheet is it's best look.

I think the bolded bit would sum up the eye-candy side for most women as well?

Individual parts for me would be eyes, hands (I love a man what's got good hands) and that stunning V of the pubic area that makes an arrow straight to a beautiful cock. Ooh and a nice ass in a snug pair of jeans. Yeah we take in the whole picture, but we can be mesmerized by a lovely part just as much as men, though perhaps not as often.
 
Back
Top