Here's how you know Obama is in trouble.

[miles]

Sean Renaud would defend The Fraud if he ate a live baby on TV. Your ridiculous argument that people dislike him because of his skin color is intellectually bankrupt.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Sean Renaud would defend The Fraud if he ate a live baby on TV. Your ridiculous argument that people dislike him because of his skin color is intellectually bankrupt.

No, it's a cold hard fact. But I actually spend plenty of time talking down about Obama. He's been a fairly big dissapointment but lots of it isn't his fault.

What's actually intellectually bankrupt is how long it took for Dems in General and blacks in particular to step up (if we can call what has happened now stepping up and hint, it's not) and actually stop beating around the bush about what was so fucking obviously happening.

 

[toubab]

Idk. Because of the whole youtube not working thing. But there are a bunch of them that I was going to link every sentence I talked about them to the individual ad. But I can't. Annoying. You'd think hospitals would have decent guest internets.

Edit: Living in Kentucky is embarrassing, in general, but during election season it's face-palm enduing, just curl up in the corner and hold your organs because it physically hurts how shitty we are as a culture time.

2nd edit: I just want you to understand that this is how our discussion went.

Me: I'd find this series of commercials if youtube would load.
You: Is it this one?
Me: I don't know. ...because YOUTUBE WON'T LOAD.

Use context clues.

I'm laughing at your advice to use context clues, Candy. Maybe you'll be able to figure out why it's funny. Maybe.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Obama's in trouble cuz he did squat for real folks. He doubled our national debt looking out for the elites.

 

[CandiCame]

I'm laughing at your advice to use context clues, Candy. Maybe you'll be able to figure out why it's funny. Maybe.

Spell it out. In the same manner one would spell out my name.

 

[Ishmael]

Please enjoy this short video of Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes doggedly refusing to say whether she voted for her party's standard-bearer two years ago during a meeting with a Kentucky newspaper's editorial board.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...d-for-obama-four-times-in-40-seconds-n1903098




And

Nevertheless, Sen. Shaheen recently appeared on Andrea Mitchell Reports to say she was “delighted” Bill and Hillary Clinton would be coming to New Hampshire to campaign for her. Curiously, however, she was remarkably unenthusiastic and distant when asked if she wanted the president to come as well:

Stay home, in other words, is what she really meant to say. After all, one component of the GOP electoral playbook this election cycle is tying Senate Democrats to the unpopular president and his policies. Hence why precious few vulnerable Democratic incumbents are voluntarily calling the White House asking him to come visit them. To do so would be political suicide in some cases, especially in deeply red and purplish states like New Hampshire.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/daniel...i-expect-obama-to-stay-in-washington-n1903388



The Dems dont want him with them. The Dems may not have even voted for him.


Yea.... Hope and Change.

Just an observation here kiddo.

Obama is NOT in trouble. He's not standing for election and won't be running for office at anytime in the near future..............if ever again. So it might have been better to have phrased it that, "Obama IS trouble, not just for the nation but for the democrat party." I personally get the impression that Obama could care less.

As far as Lundergan goes, she just shot herself in the other foot with that 'deer in the headlights moment' rendering her electoral prospects grim indeed. McConnell is not all that beloved in KY and should have been vulnerable had the democrats been able to field any candidate of substance and character. Instead they picked Lundergan for what reason, God only knows.

Given Obama's preferred method of asserting his policies, presidential orders, even the loss of the Senate won't deter him all that much. About the only real effect is going to be his ability to make appointments. And that is at least one victory, especially for appointments to the bench. This is a case where Reid's 'nuclear option' is going to come back and bite the dems in the ass. (And on that note I wouldn't be surprised to see Reid change the Senate rules back should the dems lose the senate. It would be just like the greasy little son of a bitch to do so.)

Ishmael

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

No, it's a cold hard fact. But I actually spend plenty of time talking down about Obama. He's been a fairly big dissapointment but lots of it isn't his fault.

What's actually intellectually bankrupt is how long it took for Dems in General and blacks in particular to step up (if we can call what has happened now stepping up and hint, it's not) and actually stop beating around the bush about what was so fucking obviously happening.

Lincoln had something to say about fault.

Asked if he lost sleep worrying about the outcome of the war, Lincoln replied: IF I DO EVERYTHING WRONG AND THE END COMES OUT RIGHT, IT WONT MATTER; IF I DO EVERYTHING RIGHT AND THE END COMES OUT WRONG, GOD AND ALL HIS ANGELS CANT SAVE ME.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Just an observation here kiddo.

Obama is NOT in trouble. He's not standing for election and won't be running for office at anytime in the near future..............if ever again. So it might have been better to have phrased it that, "Obama IS trouble, not just for the nation but for the democrat party." I personally get the impression that Obama could care less.

As far as Lundergan goes, she just shot herself in the other foot with that 'deer in the headlights moment' rendering her electoral prospects grim indeed. McConnell is not all that beloved in KY and should have been vulnerable had the democrats been able to field any candidate of substance and character. Instead they picked Lundergan for what reason, God only knows.

Given Obama's preferred method of asserting his policies, presidential orders, even the loss of the Senate won't deter him all that much. About the only real effect is going to be his ability to make appointments. And that is at least one victory, especially for appointments to the bench. This is a case where Reid's 'nuclear option' is going to come back and bite the dems in the ass. (And on that note I wouldn't be surprised to see Reid change the Senate rules back should the dems lose the senate. It would be just like the greasy little son of a bitch to do so.)

Ishmael

Pat Caddell expects the GOP leadership to find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. I fully expect many GOP candidates to go on tv and scream: VOTE FOR ME I'M HAVING ELVIS' BABY!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You're really proud that you ruined hope and change aren't you? It's really disgusting how much you hate your country.

Dig it!

Obama had nothing to do with it! It was porn site laments. I kinda thought that a bunch of you guys had to be top-drawer DNC operatives...

Maybe if a lot of you left, and didn't have to hear any complaints, you would be more proud of the President's quiet competence.



lol

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I really hope you are not assuming that anybody on this forum ruined "hope and change." There is always hope and the changes under Obama were negative ones. Transparency in government? Hah! He's just another politician, although less competent than most.

As for the tactic of tying the lame duck incumbent to the new candidate, the Dems, with the help of their toadies in the news media, enjoyed great success with that in 2008, with their claims of "Bush's third term." The difference is that the leading Dem candidate was closely associated with some of the worst mistakes of the Obama presidency while McCain had little to do with the Bush presidency.

It was ME!






That's why I am in the GB Hall of Fame! I despoiled Hope!

 

[Ishmael]

It was ME!






That's why I am in the GB Hall of Fame! I despoiled Hope!

Too bad you couldn't have done a better job with the change part.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Yes you all did, it's funny how badly you guys want to absolve yourselves of responsibility for your actions. There weren't a lot of changes under OBama but they weren't negative on the rare occasion they happened. Transparency in government? PErfect , not by a long shot, but there is a reason to believe transparancy in government just isn't a good thing. But certainly better than anything in recent memory yes.

So, let us recap. The Democrats had a monopoly of government, for two years and accomplished many positive things, but we here, at Lit, were so influential that our posting so inflamed the general population that they rose up and took the House away from the Democrats.



I am PROUD! I say PROUD to own that!

I've been slacking. I really better get to work on winning the Senate next month!!!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Too bad you couldn't have done a better job with the change part.

Ishmael

What the bloody 'ell are you talking about? Did I not create new jobs that no longer pay with A Fistful of Dollars but with change?



Do not try to tarnish my national image with serious and specious charges such as that!

That's Sean's job.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Just an observation here kiddo.

Obama is NOT in trouble. He's not standing for election and won't be running for office at anytime in the near future..............if ever again. So it might have been better to have phrased it that, "Obama IS trouble, not just for the nation but for the democrat party." I personally get the impression that Obama could care less.

As far as Lundergan goes, she just shot herself in the other foot with that 'deer in the headlights moment' rendering her electoral prospects grim indeed. McConnell is not all that beloved in KY and should have been vulnerable had the democrats been able to field any candidate of substance and character. Instead they picked Lundergan for what reason, God only knows.

Given Obama's preferred method of asserting his policies, presidential orders, even the loss of the Senate won't deter him all that much. About the only real effect is going to be his ability to make appointments. And that is at least one victory, especially for appointments to the bench. This is a case where Reid's 'nuclear option' is going to come back and bite the dems in the ass. (And on that note I wouldn't be surprised to see Reid change the Senate rules back should the dems lose the senate. It would be just like the greasy little son of a bitch to do so.)

Ishmael

I agree with your point that President Obama is not in trouble. The party is in trouble. They should have ran on his universally beloved record...,



... which means that like the Tea Party of 2012, they selected weak candidates, from a weak bench, who were not olnly not ready for prime time, but were picked because they looked like victims in the war on Women, but now their amateurish efforts to defend the great accomplishments of the Democrat Party for the American People are making the President and the Party look like a bad, and maybe even dangerous, joke. It's their Todd Akins week.

You cannot hide from the President and you cannot run around in private assuring everyone on your side that you are lying to get elected. One it might leak, and two it might make them wonder, "Well, are you lying now?"

 

[Ishmael]

I agree with your point that President Obama is not in trouble. The party is in trouble. They should have ran on his universally beloved record...,



... which means that like the Tea Party of 2012, they selected weak candidates, from a weak bench, who were not olnly not ready for prime time, but were picked because they looked like victims in the war on Women, but now their amateurish efforts to defend the great accomplishments of the Democrat Party for the American People are making the President and the Party look like a bad, and maybe even dangerous, joke. It's their Todd Akins week.

You cannot hide from the President and you cannot run around in private assuring everyone on your side that you are lying to get elected. One it might leak, and two it might make them wonder, "Well, are you lying now?"

She's run her campaign like someone running for 8th grade class president. Davis in TX. is just about as inept.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Wendy Davis just went after her opponent's wheelchair.

!

What the fuck has become of the Democrat Party???

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

She's run her campaign like someone running for 8th grade class president. Davis in TX. is just about as inept.

Ishmael

We were thinking along the same lines.




[Bring on Hillary!]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

First Lady Michelle Obama can't even remember the name of the candidate she is stumping for.



Why have all of the Democrat women turned into Sarah Palin???

 

[Ishmael]

First Lady Michelle Obama can't even remember the name of the candidate she is stumping for.



Why have all of the Democrat women turned into Sarah Palin???

Probably obsessed over the fact her school lunch program is swirling down the shitter.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Probably obsessed over the fact her school lunch program is swirling down the shitter.

Ishmael

Well, like HillaryCare before, this is the perfect qualification for a NY Senate run...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Citizen Four is the shocking doc about Edward Snowden made by Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras. Just screened tonight was the two hour film will be released by the Weinstein Company this month. It doesn’t paint the Obama administration in a very good light as Snowden explains how the government has violated privacy rights on a massive scale.

Also the filmmakers clearly inducate that all roads lead to POTUS, a fairly serious accusation. There may be serious repercussions.

http://www.showbiz411.com/2014/10/1...emieres-shocking-inside-look-at-how-he-did-it

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

A second National Security Agency whistleblower exists within the ranks of government intelligence.

That bombshell comes toward the end of Citizenfour, a new documentary from filmmaker Laura Poitras about NSA informant Edward Snowden that had its world premiere on Friday at the New York Film Festival.

In the key scene, journalist Glenn Greenwald visits Snowden at a hotel room in Moscow. Fearing they are being taped, Greenwald communicates with Snowden via pen and paper.

While some of the exchanges are blurred for the camera, it becomes clear that Greenwald wants to convey that another government whistleblower -- higher in rank than Snowden -- has come forward.

The revelation clearly shocks Snowden, whose mouth drops open when he reads the details of the informant's leak.

Also revealed by Greenwald is the fact that 1.2 million Americans are currently on a government watch-list. Among them is Poitras herself.

And the surprises don't end there.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/nyff-edward-snowden-doc-citizenfour-740060

October Surprise?

 

[miles]

Originally Posted by Sean Renaud View Post
You're really proud that you ruined hope and change aren't you? It's really disgusting how much you hate your country.

Are you fucking nuts?

 

[Ishmael]

http://www.showbiz411.com/2014/10/1...emieres-shocking-inside-look-at-how-he-did-it

I believe that the "serious implications" quip is a pipe dream..........unfortunately so.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I believe that the "serious implications" quip is a pipe dream..........unfortunately so.

Ishmael

Probably.

Wagons will be circled and people will throw away all that is dear to them in the Bonfire of the Myth.