Hillary Clinton Still Blames 'hateful' Youtube Video For Benghazi Attack

And for others different from you, moving forward means confronting and dismantling the generations-deep structures that holds them back from moving forward. Even when the only thing it does to you is fuck with your heretofore privilege and convenience derived thereof. Because you never had to deal with their issues OR think about them.

Yeah, I'm really fucking sorry you now have to think about things other than yourself during the process of making things better for other people. But hey, you still have your freedom to bitch and whine about it. Instead of doing other things with your life to help yourself evolve.

Accept that fact, mofo.

Give me a break....
 
clearly, Hillary is mentally damaged and the welfare zelliots will vote for her


gotta keep the welfare spigot running!
 
Here you go, Boy Next Door.

You wanted another thread about people profiting off the deaths of brave Americans.

You are right that no one would be talking about Hi(l)ary's book much less planning to buy it if not for the 34 pages she spent NOT explaining what she did and where she was during Benghazi.

You are correct it IS shameful that she would be both making political capital and receiving the filthy lucre of evil capitalism on the backs of the dead.

Kudos for your stance!
 
As the noted philosopher Freddie Mercury once opined, "♫♫ Any way the wind blows, doesn't really matter....♫♫" :D

"Nothing really matters, anyone can see, nothing really matters, nothing really matters to me"
 
Americans used to have respect for their First Ladies. Some still do.

What does being a first lady have to do with anything? :confused: Hilarious is being bashed as an inapt secretary of state and likely presidential candidate.
 
Agreed.

Now, given that the ratio of straight white men is significantly higher in elected office than in the general population, it stands to reason that one of two things are true:

1. Straight white men actually have, on average, more talent to lead and create...
2. or... we DO worry about sexuality and color... in favor of straight white men.

If you know of a #3 that I've overlooked, please elaborate.

How can you possibly know the sexual orientation of all the American presidents? :confused:
 
There's no respite from the tongue wagging jibber jabber of the entranced liberal thumping his tub with a bone.:D

Oooh, I can feel the restraints of keeping the would-be-cleverness of Vetty's usual blab within coherence actually straining this time! They held fast, by gum.

I bet this motherfucker actually thought talking this way would get him some pussy back in college. :D
 
What does being a first lady have to do with anything? :confused: Hilarious is being bashed as an inapt secretary of state and likely presidential candidate.
I thought that respect for former First Ladies and other distinguished women would be a value cherished by conservatives. I guess it isn't.
 
I thought that respect for former First Ladies and other distinguished women would be a value cherished by conservatives. I guess it isn't.

Respect for her position as first lady = qualified?

Should Laura Bush run?
 
How can you possibly know the sexual orientation of all the American presidents? :confused:

They all had wives, and I think they've all got kids too. Granted considering how strong the stigma was/is over being gay it's possible that some of them were gay and kept it on the down low. Just like it's possible that Obama's a Muslim keeping it on the DL in a country where that would be something he'd be discriminated against for being.

So the proper term would be that no openly gay man has become president because you're absolutely correct, we have no idea what goes on behind closed doors.
 
I thought that respect for former First Ladies and other distinguished women would be a value cherished by conservatives. I guess it isn't.

I do respect former first ladies and distinguished women, probably more than you do. However, I consider Hillary's current situation as being a likely candidate for POTUS to eclipse her former position as first lady. Speaking of distinguished, what do you think of Condi Rice or Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin or Jan Brewer or many other distinguished women I could mention?
 
They all had wives, and I think they've all got kids too. Granted considering how strong the stigma was/is over being gay it's possible that some of them were gay and kept it on the down low. Just like it's possible that Obama's a Muslim keeping it on the DL in a country where that would be something he'd be discriminated against for being.

So the proper term would be that no openly gay man has become president because you're absolutely correct, we have no idea what goes on behind closed doors.

I am no presidential trivia aficionado....but wasn't one of them single? In hindsight I thought there has been speculation about his orientation.

We also do not know if any American Presidents were asexual or celibate. We also have no idea how any of them felt about their gender expression.

Edit Buchanan and Cleveland were both unmarried at the time of their elections.
 
I am no presidential trivia aficionado....but wasn't one of them single? In hindsight I thought there has been speculation about his orientation.

We also do not know if any American Presidents were asexual or celibate. We also have no idea how any of them felt about their gender expression.

Edit Buchanan and Cleveland were both unmarried at the time of their elections.

Six of them were single for all or part of their terms. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_are_the_unmarried_American_Presidents
 
Buchanan was who I was thinking of...

According to this Salon Article, he was fairly openly gay amongst his confidants. Was known to be dating a gay senator.
 
I stand corrected. Though I'm not really sure if I trust Salon over much.
 
I stand corrected. Though I'm not really sure if I trust Salon over much.

They are pretty hard left in slant, but attempt a little journalistic integrity. I saw another article elsewhere that wasn't sourced. It said the Senator mentioned in the article and The President had lived together for years. Which doesn't mean that it wasn't platonic, but the bit about him being lonely and "unsuccessfully wooing several gentlemen" when the senator was in paris for a time seems pretty gay, if true.

I wouldn't say earlier times were "accepting" of homosexuality but it wasn't so much a scandal as much as an eccentricity in some social circles that prided themselves in being urbane.

Its pretty modern times that it has been reclassified from "deviant" and a "neurosis' to an orientation.

It was, I think, viewed like you might a person with a "problem" with booze or drugs...if you still functioned, meh...

I think because of the puritanical, what? late 40's to 50s?...it seemed shocking the shift in the 60's but I think the 50's was the aberration.
 
I do respect former first ladies and distinguished women, probably more than you do. However, I consider Hillary's current situation as being a likely candidate for POTUS to eclipse her former position as first lady. Speaking of distinguished, what do you think of Condi Rice or Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin or Jan Brewer or many other distinguished women I could mention?

Hah! If you consider Michelle "$200 million a day Asia trip *shout out to Vettebigot*" Bachman, Half Governor "death panels" Palin, and Jan "I didn't really lie about decapitated bodies on the border" Brewer, and Condi "torture 'em all" Rice 'distinguished' then your metric is suspect.
 
Hah! If you consider Michelle "$200 million a day Asia trip *shout out to Vettebigot*" Bachman, Half Governor "death panels" Palin, and Jan "I didn't really lie about decapitated bodies on the border" Brewer, and Condi "torture 'em all" Rice 'distinguished' then your metric is suspect.

Well, I think I would favor any of those ladies over "waves her arms and shouts 'Who cares now?" Hillary Clinton.
 
Back
Top