MillieDynamite
Millie'sVastExpanse
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
- Posts
- 8,705
What y'all talking about, suckers?
How High??? nocht verschteyen. (Danke, Google Translate.)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How High??? nocht verschteyen. (Danke, Google Translate.)
For me, "right" implies a dictionary definition, a correct usage. It's a neutral word, something is either right or wrong. "Perfect" for me adds a subjective connotation, given that English very often has a choice of words with similar meanings. It's a nuance, a subtlety, nothing more, in my usage of a word.AG31: I like to see the perfect word used.
Could you elaborate on the difference between "perfect" and "right?"
If it's just the right word, and no other word gets the meaning across the same way, I'll use a less common word.I am currently reading a story with quite a few interesting words. The latest being 'penumbra'. Personally, I like a word here and there I need to look up, but I think it is off-putting if there are too many.
This goes back to a post by @StillStunned that German is a lovely language. It went a little sideways from there. I think @ShelbyDawn57 was responsible. She probably needs(wants to be) to be punished. No surprise, I'm sure.What y'all talking about, suckers?
What y'all talking about, suckers?
This goes back to a post by @StillStunned that German is a lovely language. It went a little sideways from there. I think @ShelbyDawn57 was responsible. She probably needs(wants to be) to be punished. No surprise, I'm sure.
They're talking about opening a window.
Scheiße. Ich habe das gerade erst bekommen. Nur ein bisschen. Gerade genug für ein Kinderspiel. (Google Translate, nochmal.)Wie hoch?
Nah, I reckoned if he couldn't work it out from the context, I couldn't give a rat's.Did you rebut him with "ignorant prick"?
You're thinking of 'mullered'. Or many other words ending in -ed which probably also means 'to be very drunk' in Britglish.I've always thought that "mullioned" was a word with the wrong definition. It should actually mean something like "shagged so hard you can barely walk".
I was almost compelled to reconsider my stance on this issue. But then I realized how ludicrous it is to call a language lovely when its word for something as fragile and beautiful as butterfly is a freaking Schmetterling.German's actually a lovely language, when it's not being exaggerated to make a Hollywood villain sound evil.
From https://www.thelocal.de/20180927/der-schmetterling:I was almost compelled to reconsider my stance on this issue. But then I realized how ludicrous it is to call a language lovely when its word for something as fragile and beautiful as butterfly is a freaking Schmetterling.
"Creamling". How can you not love that?But Schmetterling has an interesting etymology. It derives from the east central German word schmetten, meaning ‘cream’, with the diminutive suffix -ling. It was believed that witches metamorphosed into butterflies to steal cream and other dairy products.
This only highlights another problem with German: that half the words start with Sch- and the other half with Ge-.
And what wrong is with people who like this talk?This only highlights another problem with German: that half the words start with Sch- and the other half with Ge-.
It’s hard consonants all the way down!
That's the key, but that doesn't mean dumb down to the lowest common denominator. If you do that, Dick fucked Jane is all you get.Many years ago, the guy who edited my second book (and went on to become a good friend) used to say: 'Only use words your reader will understand. If they don't understand the words, they're not your readers.'
That's making ignorance an excuse for laziness, or vice-versa. How does he expect readers to get past Grade Five?He also used to say: 'If you send your reader off to find a dictionary, they may not come back.'
I tend to think it is offputting as well. If you use it, have one of the other characters ask what was meant. Then explain it. Use stuff like that sparingly. Make it an addition to the story not something the reader has to either ignore or go to a dictionary.I am currently reading a story with quite a few interesting words. The latest being 'penumbra'. Personally, I like a word here and there I need to look up, but I think it is off-putting if there are too many.
Too many authors want to be superior to their readers or their fellow authors.
Really?My view, after twenty-odd years (some of them very odd) as a professional editor is that writers only use fancy words if they're more concerned with people admiring them for writing than reading what they've written.
I suppose it's a tricky one. In the lines you quoted, only "atavistic" is a word that wasn't common in the books I grew up reading and the movies I watched. I definitely think that people have stopped using the full range of words that the English language offers, and sometimes a word - for example "repugnant" - is perfect for a sentence or scene. The combination of sounds and meaning immediately creates associations that aren't quite the same as with "distasteful" or "horrible".Really?
I stumbled on this thread as I was posting a similar one. Might my post bring to mind some authors who use "fancy words" to good effect?
Ha! I didn't know there was such a feature!But randomly throwing in "big words" to appear more "writerly" just makes you look like you've right-clicked the "Synonyms" feature in Word.
Signed,But randomly throwing in "big words" to appear more "writerly" just makes you look like you've right-clicked the "Synonyms" feature in Word.
I think it is off-putting
Or ready access to a thesaurus.Contrariwise, it demonstrates immense skill.