Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an opinion piece.Yes. Lesser minds refute by attacking the source rather than challenging the idea...
I seriously doubt, based on your posts past, that you are a consumer of anything written on PJMedia.pjmedia
Ya got me, it was a satire piece. pj and its ilk are not worth refuting because of reasons put forth many times on this board. One could make a lesser mind comment about the proponents of such sources.I seriously doubt, based on your posts past, that you are a consumer of anything written on PJMedia.
He's just looking for his morning dose of conflict. I pretty much ignore him any more and eventually someone will show up who will entertain his unhealthy tendency towards "old-man, get off my lawn" garrulousness.Data doesn't talk . . . .
Once again, we see that the ardent Left prefers to attack the source in knee-jerk fashion rather than to read and offer us an informed rebuttal...Ya got me, it was a satire piece. pj and its ilk are not worth debating because of reasons put forth many times on this board. One could make a lesser mind comment about the proponents of such sources.
He's just looking for his morning dose of conflict. I pretty much ignore him any more and eventually someone will show up who will entertain his unhealthy tendency towards "old-man, get off my lawn" garrulousness.
I noticed.The IQ of this thread just dropped 20 points...
Like a rock and not the Dwayne Johnson kind...I think he was being generous.
I suspect it dropped more.
Way more . . . .
Like a rock and not the Dwayne Johnson kind...
When you quote an article from PJ media for looney toon consumption just label it 'NPR'At least chickens lay eggs. These are but the metaphorical pigeons on a chessboard.
*chuckle*When you quote an article from PJ media for looney toon consumption just label it 'NPR'
You misunderstand, seemingly. Sources such as pjmedia are not worth refuting because they contain so much misinformation and spin that it’s a time suck. Don’t get me wrong, it can always be refuted successfully, but it’s almost like the person using such links as proof are trolling, or truly don’t understand, which would support my dumbing down joke actually.Once again, we see that the ardent Left prefers to attack the source in knee-jerk fashion rather than to read and offer us an informed rebuttal...
Nah, it’s that y’all can’t find information and data outside of your confirmation bias echo chamber sources to support the party line so have to cling to that or else admit the truth that your MAGA worldview is based on lies, which would shatter your delicate psyches.... I think they fear that they might find themselves in agreement far too often and that's most likely do to insecurity over their chosen belief system, the beliefs of their desired peer group.
Not bad!When you quote an article from PJ media for looney toon consumption just label it 'NPR'
So, you're pointing out that they are no different than CBS, NPR or the NYT, all of whom have adopted a party and it ideology...You misunderstand, seemingly. Sources such as pjmedia are not worth refuting because they contain so much misinformation and spin that it’s a time suck. Don’t get me wrong, it can always be refuted successfully, but it’s almost like the person using such links as proof are trolling, or truly don’t understand, which would support my dumbing down joke actually.
Nah, it’s that y’all can’t find information and data outside of your confirmation bias echo chamber sources to support the party line so have to cling to that or else admit the truth that your MAGA worldview is based on lies, which would shatter your delicate psyches.
if you want a real belly laugh, look up posts by you, ish, and vetteman in the "what happened to all the doom and gloom economic threads?" thread.IQs have begun falling.
Is it because we don't teach handwriting anymore as this article posits?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13273363/handwriting-extinction-IQs-begin-fall.html
My theory is that we no longer read, dazzled by all the choices on the ubiquitous big screen television that dominates our living room
(or viewing room, library, bedroom? Maybe that explains falling fertility and birth rates too...).