Ignore list

Misty_Morning said:
Peekaboo........I see you.


*Jumps up and down wildly*......hey...hey....





Damn...guess she can't see me.






Hmmmm...I only have two people that are active on the boards on ignore. One becuase I just stand stand the person's AVs ...and the other just cuz.


There is one person that I have considered putting on ignore....but I am totally amazed by the persons dysfuctional mind. :rolleyes:



Damn! i didn't think my AV was that bad, or that I was dysfunctional. :eek:
 
starrkers said:
Just checked mine. I thought I had one on it. I have two. One because their sig is large, loud, annoying and stalls my computer and they never say anything worth reading anyway (no Red, definitely not you - I love your sig). The other one I don't even remember.
Awww... thanks. :rose: I'm very glad you don't have me on ignore. :rose:

For those that do. . .they miss out on a lot. *shrugs* But that's why there is the "turn off sig option". ;) :D
 
oggbashan said:
You don't know what lesbian spiders can do to each other with threads - or do you?

Og

You know I have a naughty imagination.

Hmmmm, lemme see, lesbian spiders and a spool of thread, I see it!!!

Hot lesbian spider bondage!!!

I will look closely for when you start the thread ..... about thread and stuffs.

Include lots of pictures for the scientific journals!!

:rose:
 
Lisa Denton said:
You know I have a naughty imagination.

Hmmmm, lemme see, lesbian spiders and a spool of thread, I see it!!!

Hot lesbian spider bondage!!!

I will look closely for when you start the thread ..... about thread and stuffs.

Include lots of pictures for the scientific journals!!

:rose:


Where did I put the extension tubes for my camera? Or the extending bellows? And the tables for exposure time?

Here's a formula from the last.

Effective f value contrasted with Indicated f value:

Ef =
If X Focal Length + Extension
------------------------
Focal Length

By the time I've worked all that out one of the spiders has wrapped the other in a complete cocoon of silken bonds and is nibbling... Where's that magnifying glass?

Og
 
slyc_willie said:
Now I'm wondering who has such an offensive AV that at least two people would ignore the Litster because of it . . . :confused:

I think I know the one - I remember a couple of people being somewhat put off by it. Photoshopped jobby of bloke with monster wang draped over his shoulder.
 
starrkers said:
I think I know the one - I remember a couple of people being somewhat put off by it. Photoshopped jobby of bloke with monster wang draped over his shoulder.
That one was changed to something acceptable the last time I saw that person.
 
You put me on iggy just because of my first av was of a guy with an insanely huge cock?
 
oggbashan said:
Here's a formula from the last.

Effective f value contrasted with Indicated f value:

Ef =
If X Focal Length + Extension
------------------------
Focal Length

Og


Um, you may be getting too technical for the average lesbian spider bondage scientific researchers.

Do they have any little tiny whips and chains?

:rose:
 
ms.read said:
You put me on iggy just because of my first av was of a guy with an insanely huge cock?
Nope, but I do know a couple of people were thinking about it.
 
Last edited:
starrkers said:
Nope, but I do know a couple of people were thinking about it.
Hmm. I think prehaps then they did not understand my sense of humor. And not me being somewhat of a newbie at the time, the people should have at least asked me why I put that AV up. Oh well, the past is the past. I have since moved on better things. I don't neccasarily put naked bodies on my AV's unless its a form I admire. I'd have a pic of myself but, my camera does not function. ( it had a mishap in the shower.) :rolleyes:
 
Lisa Denton said:
Do they have any little tiny whips and chains?

:rose:
Yeh... they crochet 4 chain links at a time. Fast little critters :rolleyes: Oh to be spun in silk and hung up till I mature.
 
neonlyte said:
Yeh... they crochet 4 chain links at a time. Fast little critters :rolleyes: Oh to be spun in silk and hung up till I mature.

Why does that sound delicious?

(not a lezbean spider but still into bondage)

:heart:
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Lisa, I made it nearly six years here w/o using the Ignore List. But a week or two ago, I too lost my Ignored Cherry, so to speak. There's only one name on my list and, knowing me, odds are it will be lonely for a long time.


Me too.
A sad day :(
 
Lisa Denton said:
Um, you may be getting too technical for the average lesbian spider bondage scientific researchers.

Do they have any little tiny whips and chains?

:rose:

They don't need chains when they can make their own silken thread, either just thread or sticky thread.

The ordinary thread is for normal bondage. The sticky thread is to make sure that the victim has no possibility of escape. For hetero spiders the female produces silk to bind the male so he can't struggle even when she starts to eat him.

Their whips are made from plaited silk. Silk is strong but still effective. More knots = more pain...

Og
 
Like I'm going to struggle if a woman starts to eat me. :D

Oh wait. We're using different meanings of the word 'eat', aren't we? :eek: ;)
 
oggbashan said:
They don't need chains when they can make their own silken thread, either just thread or sticky thread.

The ordinary thread is for normal bondage. The sticky thread is to make sure that the victim has no possibility of escape. For hetero spiders the female produces silk to bind the male so he can't struggle even when she starts to eat him.

Their whips are made from plaited silk. Silk is strong but still effective. More knots = more pain...

Og


Are you actually sayin, in medical and scientific terminolgy of course, that lesbian spider bondage does not include oral sex? Only hetero spider bondagers do that?

In the interests of the advancement of science, I would be willin to tie sweetsarahh up and eat her .... on film. That way maybe you could show it to the spiders and help them overcome thier oral sex phobia psychosis.

That way lesbian spiders who enjoy bondage would not be excluded from life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness merely because of thier sexual preference.

:rose:
 
Last edited:
SelenaKittyn said:
Me too.
A sad day :(


"A sad day"

Gosh, I made a big long post about how I felt to finally have to use the ignore feature, stumblin and bumblin around my feelings, and you pegged it square with just three words.

:rose:
 
I have one person on ignore, and my level of curiousity when I see him posting is surprisingly low. (An no, it's not Pure - even if he didn't have that "moderator" status he would probably only be on my limbo list for brief periods.)

But Lisa, I'm not sure I agree with your ignore criteria. I know one of the people you put on, and maybe I missed the key posts but I didn't see anything especially objectionable. Highly opinionated articulations of unpopular positions that while expressed in in-your-face terms were not in anyone's face personally. I didn't see a presumption of bad will in any of the posts (like "you must hate poor people!"), or any kind of personal ad-hominems at all. (I may well have missed though because I only scanned the thread lightly.) Those are the things that trigger my iggie button. Bombastic hyperbole at most triggers a eyeroll, whether I agree or disagree. (Chronic sneering would trigger my iggie, but - oh, I don't want to get personal so I won't say any more.)

Hopefully you see this - maybe someone can quote me just in case. :devil:
 
Highly opinionated articulations of ... positions that while expressed in in-your-face terms were not in anyone's face personally.

I don't find that the lack of personal attack makes them any less unpleasant - whether the opinions are popular or unpopular, hence my edit of your original statement.

Being rude and unpleasant to everyone in general or to large of groups of people one doesn't know does not strike me as noticably more attractive a behavior than singling out individuals. What it lacks in depth of offense, it generally makes up in breadth.
 
Back
Top