BoyNextDoor
I hate liars
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts
- 14,159
Spin.
Your statement was that the "investigation" was at the average term, not that the charges against individuals are the result of long or short duration. Nor does you chart show anything of the sort which you claim to ascribe to those individuals caught up in the Mueller mess.
Mueller's investigation is supposed to be about "Trump/Russia Collusion". It, according to you and your chart, is at the average length of time for special investigations.
Yet, as I pointed out, those investigations for which we already knew there was evidence of a crime, were short and those investigations for which the special counsel had to dig to find something/anything were long.
Mueller's been digging for over 2 years with nothing to show for it except low level offenses to bit players. That ought to tell you, and everyone else, about the state of his evidence toward that which he was originally purposed.
"low level offenses to bit players." !?
Manafort was the head of the campaign. Flynn was the National Security Advisor. Cohen was Tiny's consigliere for 10 years of more.
WhiteWater went for 8 years and Clinton was exonerated. This thing is 560 days in and look at the fucking list of convicted/plead guilty and indicted - and that list is still growing.
FFS in WaterGate Liddy was convicted in Jan '73 but the Special Counsel was not put in place until June. So you can look at the first 10 months of Mueller as the Liddy-McCord-Hunt phase. You even have the Barker, Sturgis, Gonzalez, Martinez pleas that are a lot like the Papadopolus, Gate, Zwan etc etc pleas leading to the eventual Unindicted co-conspirator.
This is not difficult stuff to get your brain around. Tis Special Counsel investigation is moving forward relatively quickly, is moving forward based on a mountain of evidence, is producing historic results, and is not done yet