In America, we prosecute and JAIL HERO GENERALS

[Busybody]

Berger got a two-year sentence and a $50,000 fine.

What did Scott get, dumbass?

What the duck is wrong with you

He got a suspended sentence....asshole.

Iggy

 

[phrodeau]

What the duck is wrong with you

He got a suspended sentence....asshole.

Iggy

He was on probation for two years, and required to do 100 hours of community service. That is not a suspended sentence, dummy.

 

[Boxlicker101]

He was on probation for two years, and required to do 100 hours of community service. That is not a suspended sentence, dummy.

He still got off light, considering what he did.

ETA: If he was sentenced to court probation, that is the same as a suspended sentence. If his sentence required him to report regularly to a probation officer, that would be something else.

 

[Tony2015]

Petraeus violated the law and potentially (though unlikely) threatened national security by giving a person without clearance access to classified information ... because she was giving him nobbers.

You don't find a problem in that?

Hell, they impeached Bill Clinton for getting nobbers, and all he shared with the homely chick was his cigars.

You can't give the man a pass just because he's a military hero. He shared confidential information illegally. They found this information on her computer. What if someone even less authorized to have that information had gotten access to her computer? That's why they call it classified.

 

[Busybody]

Petraeus violated the law and potentially (though unlikely) threatened national security by giving a person without clearance access to classified information ... because she was giving him nobbers.

You don't find a problem in that?

Hell, they impeached Bill Clinton for getting nobbers, and all he shared with the homely chick was his cigars.

You can't give the man a pass just because he's a military hero. He shared confidential information illegally. They found this information on her computer. What if someone even less authorized to have that information had gotten access to her computer? That's why they call it classified.

Clinton wasn't impeached for that

 

[Tony2015]

Clinton wasn't impeached for that

He was impeached for lying and obstructing justice in the case concerning his getting his cigar wet, as well as other things. But Clinton isn't the point. The point is you don't let a man slide on passing on secrets to an unauthorized person just because that person is a war hero.

Hell, MacArthur was relieved of command in Korea just for talking shit about Truman's administration, and he didn't even have to pull out his dick for that. And Mac was a hero of two wars!

 

[Boxlicker101]

He was impeached for lying and obstructing justice in the case concerning his getting his cigar wet, as well as other things. But Clinton isn't the point. The point is you don't let a man slide on passing on secrets to an unauthorized person just because that person is a war hero.

Hell, MacArthur was relieved of command in Korea just for talking shit about Truman's administration, and he didn't even have to pull out his dick for that. And Mac was a hero of two wars!

Clinton was impeached for perjury, lying while under oath, which is a felony.

 

[Tony2015]

Clinton was impeached for perjury, lying while under oath, which is a felony.

Isn't that what I just said? Why don't you address the issue at hand rather than trying to nit pick at what you think are my misstatements. Or, do you realize that I'm correct and you have no standing for your argument.

Question: Should a man be punished for giving classified information to a person not authorized to have it? Simple question.

BTW, I'm unsubscribing from this. I can't handle people who won't stick to the subject.

 

[Busybody]

THE DEFINITIVE TAKE ON THE PETRAEUS CASE: “Guy who helped win war in Iraq to be prosecuted by man who lost it.”

 

[phrodeau]

THE DEFINITIVE TAKE ON THE PETRAEUS CASE: “Guy who helped win war in Iraq to be prosecuted by man who lost it.”

Al-Maliki has nothing to do with it, dummy.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Isn't that what I just said? Why don't you address the issue at hand rather than trying to nit pick at what you think are my misstatements. Or, do you realize that I'm correct and you have no standing for your argument.

Question: Should a man be punished for giving classified information to a person not authorized to have it? Simple question.

BTW, I'm unsubscribing from this. I can't handle people who won't stick to the subject.

You omitted the fact that he was under oath at the time, which is far more serious than ordinary lying. All politicians lie, and it's even expected of them, but they are not usually under oath at the time.

I don't see any point in beating a dead horse either, but you were the one who brought up the case and left out the most important part of it.

 

[Busybody]

Prosecute Betry Us

But not

Lois Lerner

Makes sense under Barack Hussein Obola

 

[Busybody]

so a new theory has emerged

Betray Us has been asked by a Senate Cmte to testify RE Benghazi

This PROSECUTION is a WARNING SHOT....don't do it!

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]