Intelligent Conversation

Re: My two bits?

Sparky Kronkite said:
FAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRT!

I knew something was wrong, the name of the thread was Intelligent Conversation and it showed that the last poster was Sparky Kronkite.

Talk about your oxymorons.
 
Now that Mr. Dillinger was some amazing insight complete with intelligent theory.

I’m reminded of a party Brian Eno threw in the late 70’s. On the invite he told everyone that it was an “intelligent” party and only intelligent things would be allowed to be said.

Talk about funky surreal pressure.

I have to say you are the most interesting..intelligent..sexually charged geek I’ve ever had the pleasure of reading.
 
kashmir said:
Now that Mr. Dillinger was some amazing insight complete with intelligent theory.

I’m reminded of a party Brian Eno threw in the late 70’s. On the invite he told everyone that it was an “intelligent” party and only intelligent things would be allowed to be said.

Talk about funky surreal pressure.

I have to say you are the most interesting..intelligent..sexually charged geek I’ve ever had the pleasure of reading.

Thank you. Were you at that Eno party? My first career was in music... and Eno had a fair influence on me - I even used his random card deck for making musical decisions for a while when composing.

Uhm.. I'm flattered... even by the geek part.. thanks.
 
Kitten Eyes said:
Perhaps this phenomenon needs further study, care to be my lab partner? ;)

Sorry, a conversation...

What (in 100 wordds or less) exactly is the difference between Zen and that other stuff you mentioned? And can you achieve these states of mind at 130 mph?

Oh absolutely - it takes two to Zentango, you know. Yin and Yang, baby... YIN and YANG... I've got the lingham if you've got the yoni...

OK... 100 words or less - what is the difference between zen and that other stuff I mentioned? I assume you mean Quantum Physics?

OK - here goes...

Q: What is the difference between zen and that other stuff I mentioned?

A: To get to the other side.


Here, though, I make my quantum leap;
a plunge into the water, then a landing upon
his page, a metamorphosis into tadpoles
waving inky tails like laughter.

-- From "The Sound Of Two Realities Diverging" by Donna Farley

You might want to check this out: ftp://ftp.buddhanet.net/zenbud/quantum2.zip (Buddhism in the Light of Quantum Reality)

Q: And can you achieve these states of mind at 130 mph?

A: Absolutely not - minimum speed is 186 000 miles/sec.
 
Re: Re: My two bits?

sch00lteacher said:


I knew something was wrong, the name of the thread was Intelligent Conversation and it showed that the last poster was Sparky Kronkite.

Talk about your oxymorons.


LMAO He's LMAO . He's not unintelligent, just immature. You probably deal with a lot of that. lol again.

Thanks Teach, I needed that.
 
Re: Intelligent Conversation Thread Without Me?

Rick DeVille said:
Intelligent Conversation Thread Without Me?

It's a strange world.

Who'da thunk it?
 
Re: Re: Re: My two bits?

patient1 said:



LMAO He's LMAO . He's not unintelligent, just immature. You probably deal with a lot of that. lol again.

Thanks Teach, I needed that.

There's only one Sparky... (thank god!)
 
Dillinger said:
So.. who wants to take me on tonight?

I could try to hold an intelligent conversation with you. :D What could the topic of the conversation be?
 
Statistics...sat through 5 hours of it today and I might tear out my hair.:mad:

Wait a sec...that's not at all interesting. Sorry.:(

Alexandra
 
and what is intelligent about doing ya eh??

:p
 
Yeah... even got a smart ass. *grin*

What's your kink, Siren... like to talk about the how information travels faster then light while taking it doggie style?
 
Dillinger said:
And what, pray tell, is intelligent about statistics? *smile*

ummm...that more than 3/4 of the statistics we read/hear about are bullshit. It's sooo easy to "un"prove anything (as nothing can actually be proven due to infinite unknown conditions.) Also I pictured some people in the class having orgasms to help me stay awake. Just can't shake that perv thing.:eek:
 
Marketing. Hired specialists. Unless we're talking hard science, numbers can be manipulated to prove just about any point. Yes?

(How many orgasms did you have?)
 
I don't know if I know how to have an intelligent conversation anymore.

I can talk about hot tub maintenance or what children's computer games are available. The best cleaner to use on the floor in the kitchen. Where I didn't find the Cadbury Easter Eggs today. :(

My mind is so bleached from the mindless necessary tasks of the day that I need someone to add a little stain to bring it back to color...
 
Dillinger said:
Marketing. Hired specialists. Unless we're talking hard science, numbers can be manipulated to prove just about any point. Yes?

You can take hard science and manipulate your sample (by amount, for instance) to prove something else entirely.
Example below:

(How many orgasms did you have?)

I had twelve orgasms. (leaves you wondering...was that just today? In a month? Or ever? (ugh, can you imagine?)
 
Are there any computer games incorporating hot tubs? Only one I can think of is the Sims.

And geez - shopping for Easter candy already? Should we do Valentine's day first?

Red or blue for that stain? Purple perhaps? Do you know why purple is associated with royalty? It's because the manufacture was extremely time-consuming. Estimates are that it took 8,500 shellfish to produce 1 gram of the dye. For that reason, purple was only available to royalty, and it also became known as royal purple.
 
Re: Ya got me......

Siren said:


so tell me.......what do you think of the new testing of Einstiens theory of relativity?

Which one? The Bose-Einstein condensates? Perehelion advances of planetary orbits? Strong field tests? Weak field tests? The new accelerators?
 
alexandraaah said:


I had twelve orgasms. (leaves you wondering...was that just today? In a month? Or ever? (ugh, can you imagine?)

I meant in class. *grin*
 
Dillinger said:


I meant in class. *grin*

See how ambiguous these numbers are??
I got me my very own copy of the DSM IV last week; want me to look up any mental disorders? I could give ya the verbatim definition...:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top