Interracial sex

[wildwesty]

The only time I ever ran into flack was with my current girlfriends parents who have that 1950's mindset. I am the product of an interracial couple but to be very honest, could pass for white pretty easily. They really want her to break up with me because they are very big on looks and what people would say if they knew. It doesn't matter than I treat her better than any other guy ever has but only that I have black in my genes. I hate people who don't really think anymore. I am glad there are so many on here that are good people who take race for what it is...not an issue at all.

 

[NaughtyKelly]

The only time I ever ran into flack was with my current girlfriends parents who have that 1950's mindset. I am the product of an interracial couple but to be very honest, could pass for white pretty easily. They really want her to break up with me because they are very big on looks and what people would say if they knew. It doesn't matter than I treat her better than any other guy ever has but only that I have black in my genes. I hate people who don't really think anymore. I am glad there are so many on here that are good people who take race for what it is...not an issue at all.

You're right honey but racists aren't people to be bothered about are they You got with your heart love

 

[wildwesty]

I am not in love with her parents and ultimately, they don't decide who she can and cannot be with. It is her life and she knows that. AT times, I think parents over step their bounds and try to control too much. Who we love is our decision and no one else can force that to change, black, white, asian, latin, whatever.

 

[Vay]

I am not in love with her parents and ultimately, they don't decide who she can and cannot be with. It is her life and she knows that. AT times, I think parents over step their bounds and try to control too much. Who we love is our decision and no one else can force that to change, black, white, asian, latin, whatever.

Damn straight!

 

[cuzinevil]

mmm

I hope you all don't mind if lurk here. I would be hopelessly addicted to any of the women on this thread.....

 

[cuzinevil]

Re: grief

Years later in England, I met a young black man, Richard, who I lived with for a couple of months. Over there I had no problem. A few years later he came to the US and stayed. He is still one of my closest friends [and my hubby's]. But to walk in some where over here I could see the stares and heard the comments. As my hubby says, people with narrow minds have no business in our circle of friends. [/B][/QUOTE]

Amen to that.


found a pic for hotlips...

 

[Vay]

You and your creampies!

 

[showuoff]

Missed the point?

Personally, I think most of the posters here missed the point. You all essentially sneered at what gets blond blue off.

Sure, many people have wonderful love relationships with one person who just happens to be of a different race. Sure, you don't notice color under those circumstances.

That is not what blonde blue was talking about. She was talking about a fetish -- not a mere preference, and certainly not a love relationship with the black men. BB is married and she and her husband get off when she fucks black guys. Are you suggesting she ought to develop a love relationship with these men? She has her love relationship with her husband. The black guys could as easily be blow up dolls or dildos for a different couple.

BB and her husband get off on black skin and, perhaps, a slut fantasy (although BB never made the fantasy clear). Whether it is just a blackman fetish or it is combined with a slut and humiliation fantasy doesn't matter. It's BB's thing. From the looks of some of the personals posted on the net, it's many people's thing. It has nothing to do with your love relationships.

I could understand if some white people feel rejected because they are not the object of BB's desire. I could also understand if some black men or women say, "I odn't want to be objectified based on my color. I don't want to be a mere dildo or fetish object." That's fine. Then don't go fuck BB. Apparently the men in the pictures don't mind being the object of her fetish.

There is nothing wrong with her fetish. She is *NOT* socially misdirected or an evil racist. She merely has a sexual kink she is sharing with us. We all seek the solace of knowing we are not so weird and maladjusted that we are alone in the world with our kink.

Some of the posts here, however, went beyond merely saying, "I don't share your kink." Some appeard to have a bit of a holier than thou attitude, and some were even outright judgemental. Why?

All except one poster spoke of heterosexual relationships. Maybe you could all go to the Gay thread and give each other kudos for being straight. Or how about going to the BDSM thread and praising the virtues of gentle, romantic love, each of you reinforcing the message by posting to yourselves how correct you all are. Hmmm? Let's all contemplate the meaning of narrow-mindedness.

 

[blackdong]

attaboy!

finally somebody redefining narrowmindedness!

 

[hotlips77]

Re: Missed the point?

Fetishes are great, what would life be without them. When I first found this thread, my hubby and I answered her poll honestly and in the spirit of a fetish.
What I don't understand [I can't speak for the other posters] is originally she posted several times [withpics] and asked if no one was interested. When posts started coming in, we haven't heard from her again. Personally, I would have liked to discussed fetishes [black or otherwise] with her and all fellow posters. She simply disappeared.
She had PM'd my hubby and wanted to discuss blackcock/gloryholes etc. Having checked her bio and seeing they are from the same area we were, he responded. No answer. Haven't heard from her again.
Where is she? Why start a thread and disappear? It seems the narrow mindedness comes from making several statements backed up with pics [which I enjoyed] and then not caring enough to carry on the thread.
So, BB, if you're out there come back and talk to us, apparently you have some supporters. If you can't talk to us, do it for them

 

[showuoff]

Re: Re: Missed the point?

She had PM'd my hubby and wanted to discuss blackcock/gloryholes etc. Having checked her bio and seeing they are from the same area we were, he responded. No answer. Haven't heard from her again.
Where is she? Why start a thread and disappear? It seems the narrow mindedness comes from making several statements backed up with pics [which I enjoyed] and then not caring enough to carry on the thread.
So, BB, if you're out there come back and talk to us, apparently you have some supporters. If you can't talk to us, do it for them

Amen. I thought, at first, she ran away from the moralizers. Apparently disappearing is her regular act. Too bad.

 

[angel4u2lust4]

Color of sex?

Ok whatever floats one's boat.....but all color of men come in different sizes, there are black men with not so well off and white men who are. if you just get turned on by the color that is one thing, but color doesn't fuck you the person operating the cock or pussy does.

Chow

 

[jacksonville12]

Hey I enjoy interracial sex.....a black man fucking a white woman specifically. Does that make me a racist...hell no!

There are hundreds of interracial stories on lit and the porn stores are full of interracial videos so I've got plenty of company.

Yes, it is all a big stereotype.....black men have no bigger cocks than white guys on average. However, some big dicked black guy fucking a white woman, while calling her his whore is taboo sex.... maybe because it is almost like a revenge fuck or something for years of slavery!....lol

What is taboo to one person is not to another. It depends on where you are from and how you are raised.

I will admit some people do get a little extreme and make it a racist thing. I was having phone sex once and this girl kept using the N word when describing her experiences getting fucked by a black guy. I thought she was a disgusting pig.

However these racist aside, interracial sex can be a very beautiful, erotic taboo. A well photograped picture of a huge black cock fucking a beautiful, white woman is "erotic art" at its best if you ask me.....the color contrast is awesome.

If your going to judge a taboo..... go after all those people into incest and beastiality taboos.....now THAT shit should be more than taboo...gross!

 

[showuoff]

Re: Re: Missed the point?

She had PM'd my hubby and wanted to discuss blackcock/gloryholes etc. Having checked her bio and seeing they are from the same area we were, he responded. No answer. Haven't heard from her again.
Where is she? Why start a thread and disappear? It seems the narrow mindedness comes from making several statements backed up with pics [which I enjoyed] and then not caring enough to carry on the thread.
So, BB, if you're out there come back and talk to us, apparently you have some supporters. If you can't talk to us, do it for them

Amen. I thought, at first, she ran away from the moralizers. Apparently disappearing is her regular act. Too bad.

 

[hotlips77]

Re: Color of sex?

Ok whatever floats one's boat.....but all color of men come in different sizes, there are black men with not so well off and white men who are. if you just get turned on by the color that is one thing, but color doesn't fuck you the person operating the cock or pussy does.

Chow

Angel,
You're a girl after my own heart. I would love to see your pussy!

HL

 

[capricious_chic]

Re: Missed the point?

Personally, I think most of the posters here missed the point. You all essentially sneered at what gets blond blue off.

blah blah blah

There is nothing wrong with her fetish. She is *NOT* socially misdirected or an evil racist. She merely has a sexual kink she is sharing with us. We all seek the solace of knowing we are not so weird and maladjusted that we are alone in the world with our kink.

Some of the posts here, however, went beyond merely saying, "I don't share your kink." Some appeard to have a bit of a holier than thou attitude, and some were even outright judgemental. Why?
blah blah blah

I think you are the one who has missed the point.

The point is that it isn't a fetish.
Main Entry: fe·tish
Variant(s): also fe·tich /'fe-tish also 'fE-/
Function: noun
Etymology: French & Portuguese; French fétiche, from Portuguese feitiço, from feitiço artificial, false, from Latin facticius factitious
1 a : an object (as a small stone carving of an animal) believed to have magical power to protect or aid its owner; broadly : a material object regarded with superstitious or extravagant trust or reverence b : an object of irrational reverence or obsessive devotion : PREPOSSESSION c : an object or bodily part whose real or fantasied presence is psychologically necessary for sexual gratification and that is an object of fixation to the extent that it may interfere with complete sexual expression.

To say that interracial sex is a fetish is to objectify the person.
We live in a society that frowns upon people being objectified. Ask any woman.

To say that this is a sexual kink is also demeaning.

Main Entry: 1kink
Pronunciation: 'ki[ng]k
Function: noun
Etymology: Dutch; akin to Middle Low German kinke kink
1 : a short tight twist or curl caused by a doubling or winding of something upon itself
2 a : a mental or physical peculiarity : ECCENTRICITY, QUIRK b : WHIM
3 : a clever unusual way of doing something

It implies that interracial sex is peculiar. It is plain ol' sex just like any other.

There is nothing wrong with her preference - however her wording and lack of response leaves much to be desired.
People didn't say they disapproved of interracial sex/relationships/ect. - in fact many who replied said they were all for it and shared in her so-called preference, but for much different reasons. The reasons being that they enjoyed the other person not because of their skin color but because of who they were. Not: I need to be in love with this person, not: I have to be in a relationship with this person, simply because this person was attractive and the skin color was a side note. Her wording is stereotypical, demeaning, racist and the lack of response implies something else completely and comes across and bigoted and creepy. She need only to clarify - yet that doesn't seem likely to happen. She opened up herself for judgment by starting a thread. Anyone who starts a thread, regardless of intent or purpose, opens themselves up to the same. It is human nature to judge another and for many of us it is also in our nature to call a spade a spade. (ok that just struck me as really funny considering the topic..anyway, I digress) The spade here being that considering interracial sex as anything other than two (or more) consenting adults having sex is absurd.

My initial response:

You would have a much better response in the Am Pic forum.

I doubt that there are many here that consider this as a fetish, kinky, or taboo - simply a preference.

What discussion? You haven't addressed anyone that has posted.

Since you just want to post your pics why not try the other forum.


To answer your poll..

Women of any color should fuck whomever they please. I personally wouldn't want to be singled out for something as basic as the color of my skin.

I still believe she would have gotten a much better response from like-minded people in the am pic forum and most here would have skipped right over it.

Wow, I am really long-winded tonight. Fuck it, I feel chatty.

 

[capricious_chic]

<snip> Ok, we know that most of those among us here are cool with interracial relationships as relationships, but (and this is geared to those who have or are in one) has anyone gotten any flak about being in one? In what way? How did you deal with it?
<snip>
Just wanted to ask a serious question to make this thread more interesting.

Going off on a tangent:
I think in many ways we are progressing as a society so that this is no long considered a taboo. I just have to do it, I can't resist:

Main Entry: 1ta·boo
Variant(s): also ta·bu /t&-'bü, ta-/
Function: adjective
Etymology: Tongan tabu
1 : forbidden to profane use or contact because of what are held to be dangerous supernatural powers
2 a : banned on grounds of morality or taste <the subject is taboo> b : banned as constituting a risk.

Once upon a time in America for white women this was forbidden/banned/amoral etc. It hasn't been considered as such for quite some time now so it amuses me to hear people refer to interracial relationships as a fetish, kink, taboo, etc. I think that there are probably different regions in various countries that this would be frowned upon - typically regions that are full of ignorance and a microscopic view of the world.

We are becoming more and more diverse as a race (world wide) and the more that one is exposed to the more inclined they are to accept people on character and integrity alone.

In answer to your questions:

I have been in many interracial relationships and more often than not it is my partner that senses tension or flak from others. I simply don't acknowledge it and refuse to become bothered by it.

I have family members that disapprove - yet this is the same family that had anyone and everyone over to dinner and taught me to judge another solely on character. Mostly it is the older generation (grandmother, great aunt and uncles, etc) that have an issue with it. I try and understand the differences in society that they dealt with - but it simply does not excuse bigotry in my mind. I can logically appreciate it but will not tolerate it.

Vay - usually when I encounter tension or flak it is from black women who see me with a black male. Asian women, Mexican women, <insert whatever> women rarely every have an issue - black women are a whole other kettle of fish. Granted there are many black women who could care less and I don't mean to imply otherwise - only that in my experience it has been so. I usually just smile a blank smile and don't acknowledge the unreasonable anger that is directed toward me. There is nothing I can do or say that will make an unreasonable person suddenly become reasonable.

Usually I am accepted or tolerated and this is something that has gotten easier through the years. Considering I started dating oh-so-many years ago I am really impressed at how far we have come as a people and how far we continue to grow - yet we still have quite some growing to do and probably always will. That is why these types of discussions are so important.

I have always dated inside, outside, and all around my race. Color is simply unimportant to me. I relate it to eye color or hair color. I am very pale - so even white men with a slight tan creates a nice contrast of skin on skin with me. Cock size is as individual as the man and truly has nothing to do with skin color.
Not all Asian men are small and not all African-American men are huge.

 

[jacksonville12]

Once upon a time in America for white women this was forbidden/banned/amoral etc. It hasn't been considered as such for quite some time now so it amuses me to hear people refer to interracial relationships as a fetish, kink, taboo, etc.

Sorry u capricious little hottie but ur wrong......u apparently don't live in the same America as I do. Yes, interracial relationships are becoming more "acceptable" but they are still taboo to a LOT of people. I would expect even more so in the south.

I do agree it is not a fetish.....people like it for either the taboo, the color contrast, or just because they like the person.

As educated and "enlightened" as I am....it is still a taboo. The reason being that I was "raised" in a prejudiced community and society.

EVERY one of us have prejudices and we are ALL victims of the prejudices we were raised with (if you say you have no prejudices you are lying!) We should certainly all try and overcome them......however if a taboo rooted in prejudice/stereotype can get you off then I say go for it....at least ur gettin some fun out of it!.....lol


My personal opinion of the thread starter is that they have some pretty deeply rooted prejudices. It would also not surprise me if it was a guy pretending to be a woman. The whole cuckhold/shared wife fantasy thing you know.....

 

[capricious_chic]

You left off the rest of my quote jackson No it is not a taboo because it isn't forbidden - meaning that it is not illegal. Yes, it is frowned upon in some communities - but still not illegal.

Actually I have found the "south" to be a bit more open-minded - especially when you factor in immigration. But yes, there are communities that are microscopic in nature.

Of course we all have prejudices - it is whether or not or even how we act upon them that define what kind of person we are.


My personal opinion of the thread starter is that they have some pretty deeply rooted prejudices. It would also not surprise me if it was a guy pretending to be a woman. The whole cuckold/shared wife fantasy thing you know

I was totally thinking the same thing!

 

[showuoff]

Re: Re: Missed the point?

I think you are the one who has missed the point.

The point is that it isn't a fetish.
Main Entry: fe·tish
Variant(s): also fe·tich /'fe-tish also 'fE-/

[yaddah, yaddah, yaddah]

To say that interracial sex is a fetish is to objectify the person.
We live in a society that frowns upon people being objectified. Ask any woman.

To say that this is a sexual kink is also demeaning.

Main Entry: 1kink
Pronunciation: 'ki[ng]k
Function: noun
Etymology: Dutch; akin to Middle Low German kinke kink
1 : a short tight twist or curl caused by a doubling or winding of something upon itself
2 a : a mental or physical peculiarity : ECCENTRICITY, QUIRK b : WHIM
3 : a clever unusual way of doing something

It implies that interracial sex is peculiar. It is plain ol' sex just like any other.

[ Yap, yap, yap]

She opened up herself for judgment by starting a thread. Anyone who starts a thread, regardless of intent or purpose, opens themselves up to the same. It is human nature to judge another and for many of us it is also in our nature to call a spade a spade. (ok that just struck me as really funny considering the topic..anyway, I digress) The spade here being that considering interracial sex as anything other than two (or more) consenting adults having sex is absurd.

Wow, I am really long-winded tonight. Fuck it, I feel chatty.
(you said it -- not me)

I see YOU have a dictionary fetish. Well, you need a new dictionary, with more varied definitions. The definitions in your dictionay do not directly apply to sexual fetish. Maybe you ought to look it up in a Psychology Dictionary.

I can clearly see that you are person who thinks it is very wrong to sexually objectify others. I can tell you hold your beliefs about sexual objectification strongly from your Avatar.

Since a naked femal ass is your representation of yourself, and since you do not believe in objectification, can I assume a naked ass is what you believe best represents the true essence of your being? (Sorry, just kidding, but I couldn't resist. The made me do it. )

Unless you are on these boards looking for love and marriage, you are here because of sexual objectification in one form or another. Gloria Steinem might well lecture most of us on our Avatars. But she's an infamous prig.

Both males and females here objectify feet, hands, boobs, pussies, clits, (name your own body part or attribute), on a constant basis. The Avatars do the same. The porn pic threads do the same. That's what it is all about.

You are simply someone who thinks what turns you on is OK, but what turns other on is not if it's not your thing. Your thing is fine, what others do is disgusting or demeaning.

I'll bet you know some people would think that you posting here is objectifying and demeaning. One would hope people who post here have risen above that. Apparently not.

Sure blondeblue opened herself up for judgement by posting here. She didn't ask for your judgements, but she opened herself up for them. And you jumped right in and acted judgemental. That was the point of my post. I asked "Why," and the best you can tell me is: "She opened herself up for it."
Very enlightening.

By the way, there is nothing demeaning about the word "Kink."
There is also the 3rd defintion which you present and then ignore: "A clever or unusual way of doing something."

I would point out, however, that blondeblue's interracial thing is a kink in the sense of the word as a "quirk," -- the synonym given by your dictionary. It is because of its features as a taboo and therefore an eccentricity, something unusual and a quirk that blondeblue and her husband enjoy interracial sex.

To think of interracial sex or any other kind of sex as something other than just plain sex between two or more people is not "absurd." except in your judgemental lexicon.

But hey, judge away. That's your right. It is, of course, my right to point out that you are acting like just another of those who think their own moral beliefs are on some higher ground.

 

[dreams4sale]

Interracial sex is the hottest going. Must be that old taboo thing. The big black mandingo man taking the little white southern wife. Well, it lights my fire. Anyone else's?? There's just something about a big black cock pounding relentlessly into a little white woman. If her husband is watching, it's that much more erotic. Him watching his wife get a great fucking. I know my husband loves it. Not near as much as me though. I also love having more than one at a time. Getting swapped back and forth from one big cock to the next. Each one pumping me full and then exploding inside me until my pussy looks like niagra falls.

I think it's damn hot !

 

[capricious_chic]

Re: Re: Re: Missed the point?

I see YOU have a dictionary fetish. Well, you need a new dictionary, with more varied definitions. The definitions in your dictionay do not directly apply to sexual fetish. Maybe you ought to look it up in a Psychology Dictionary.

I wouldn't say so. I simply dislike it when people believe they understand what they are talking about and use words out of context.

Originally posted by showuoff
I can clearly see that you are person who thinks it is very wrong to sexually objectify others. I can tell you hold your beliefs about sexual objectification strongly from your Avatar.

Since a naked femal ass is your representation of yourself, and since you do not believe in objectification, can I assume a naked ass is what you believe best represents the true essence of your being? (Sorry, just kidding, but I couldn't resist. The made me do it. )

That was actually funny as hell! I don't have AV's on so most of the time I have no idea what other people use or what one I have up. I don't relate people with them.

Originally posted by showuoff
Unless you are on these boards looking for love and marriage, you are here because of sexual objectification in one form or another. Gloria Steinem might well lecture most of us on our Avatars. But she's an infamous prig.

Both males and females here objectify feet, hands, boobs, pussies, clits, (name your own body part or attribute), on a constant basis. The Avatars do the same. The porn pic threads do the same. That's what it is all about.

I am not looking for anything beyond a simple passage of time.
I don't think that is what it is all about - but realize that for others it may well be.

Originally posted by showuoff
You are simply someone who thinks what turns you on is OK, but what turns other on is not if it's not your thing. Your thing is fine, what others do is disgusting or demeaning.

I'll bet you know some people would think that you posting here is objectifying and demeaning. One would hope people who post here have risen above that. Apparently not.

Dude, did you even read my response? If that is what you got out of it you should really read again. If you still think that after doing so then your conclusion is your own, but not my intent.

Originally posted by showuoff
Sure blondeblue opened herself up for judgement by posting here. She didn't ask for your judgements, but she opened herself up for them. And you jumped right in and acted judgemental. That was the point of my post. I asked "Why," and the best you can tell me is: "She opened herself up for it."
Very enlightening.

She asked by simply posting. She wanted feedback and didn't specify she only wanted positive feedback. Regardless we are all welcome to post what we want, where we want because of the structure of this BB. Again did you read my response? My initial post was not judgmental - simply a suggestion as to where she would receive more favorable responses. I didn't suggest at any time that I thought that she was amoral or wrong in her desires. Again, she/he has not came back to clarify things that people took issue with so who knows.

Originally posted by showuoff
By the way, there is nothing demeaning about the word "Kink."
There is also the 3rd defintion which you present and then ignore: "A clever or unusual way of doing something."

I would point out, however, that blondeblue's interracial thing is a kink in the sense of the word as a "quirk," -- the synonym given by your dictionary. It is because of its features as a taboo and therefore an eccentricity, something unusual and a quirk that blondeblue and her husband enjoy interracial sex.

To think of interracial sex or any other kind of sex as something other than just plain sex between two or more people is not "absurd." except in your judgemental lexicon.

But hey, judge away. That's your right. It is, of course, my right to point out that you are acting like just another of those who think their own moral beliefs are on some higher ground.

Ah, but there is nothing clever or unusual about interracial sex unless one views the other as beneath/above them. That is why I would consider it demeaning. Otherwise it is simply sex between two consenting adults - hardly clever or unusual. Unless it is sex with me. Heh!

My points of view are by no means correct or right - they are simply that, my points of view. My opinion is worth as much time as it took me to voice/type it. You are by all means free to "judge" me how you will - I simply disagree with your assessment of my opinion and of me.

 

[showuoff]

To Capricious_chic

I have to agree with some of what you say. I am not defending blondeblue here. It was my independant impression too, before anybody said it, that although there is apparently a couple involved, (form the number of obviously amateur pics all of what seems to be the same female), that the postings are being made by the male half of that retlationship. It probably a very astute observation on all our parts.

I absolutely agree that blondeblue ought to be in here defending themselves.

The reason I posted was not to defend blondeblue. It was to point out that we Puritans sought religious freedom, and therefore ought to be tolerant of others. We are here seeking a tolerant forum for our own sexual views. We should, therefore, try to be tolerant and less judgemental of the sexual views of others.

I do not agree that the words "absurd" with reference to a view other than yours, and stating that that certain things are wrong or demeaning are not judgements. They are, in my opinion negative judgements on most of what is going on around here, including those things in which you, yourself particpate. I would hope you might recognize that.

Saying you don't have AV's turned on, does not explain what you have posted as yours. It clearly objecifies females and yourself. I certainly hope, in light of your views, that you pronounce the second half of your name "sheek" rather than "chick," since a large contingent of women feel reference to females as chicks is both demeaning and objectifying.

Be aware that people are here because much of sex play includes objectification, and anonymous sex play must, by definition, include objectification. Blondblue is, she says, having anonymous sex live rather than on a computer. It still must, because of its anonymity, be objectified. A penis through a glory hole is just that, a body part and nothing more. If you get a view of the whole person but are still acting as if the penis is sticking through the hole, nothing changes.

I still think most of the people responding about love relationships missed the point, and then got holier than thou. Hey, maybe you are right, anonymous sexual relationships are wrong. We should only have sex in long-term loving relationships. There is a large contingent that believe that. But that does not mean that such a position is on the moral high ground to any other, or that other positions are wrong, demeaning or absurd.

By the way, dictionaries rarely prove anything except questions of semantics. The issues here ar not semantic in nature.

I do think you are very intelligent person, and hopefully with a little introspection you will see what I am talking about. if not, no big deal, the debate was fun.

PS- I don't remember whether your original post was judgemental or not. I don't have time right now to go back and find it. I don't think I was necessarily speaking to you or about you in my first post. Nevertheless, you responded, so I guess you thought I was. In my second post I was merely replying to your response which was, in my humble opinion, clearly judgemental.

Last thing, sex between any two people of any color is not unusual, a kink, or anything else. The way blondeblue practices interracial sex, however, I think you agree is kinky. She uses black skin not as preference (she prefers white men that's why she married one) but a clear fetish (something not ordinarily sexual in nature from which blondeblue derives sexual excitement). Her fetish is, to the extent it is unusual, a kink. So what? Call it anything you like, but it is not love-relationship sex. That's the only point. No one is saying ALL interracial sex is a fetish or kinky, just blondeblue's version of it.

 

[dreams4sale]

Enough lol

Blue show everything you have, it's very erotic to some of us dear !!

 

[Sexfreak4u]

Well, I'm bi-sexual so I can see what
you see in big black cocks. I think they
are beautiful.