IQ matters

[BoyNextDoor]

Lame link.

It's kinda rude to post something you haven't tried yourself, yeah?

Because fucked if I'm paying for that shit.

Why is it lame? It is a non letter, non-numeric, culturally unbiased test. Post one you like then?

I did take it and did not pay for it. Just click on the start the test button.

 

[girlsmiley]

Why is it lame? It is a non letter, non-numeric, culturally unbiased test. Post one you like then?

I did take it and did not pay for it. Just click on the start the test button.

You think I didn't click the start test button?

LOL

 

[girlsmiley]

Ironic.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Ironic.

The irony is you thinking I am the rude one.

 

[girlsmiley]

The irony is you thinking I am the rude one.

No. You posted a lame link and now you're telling us to click the start button like we're stupid in a thread titled IQ matters.

Never go full retard, mmkay. It's unbecoming.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

No. You posted a lame link and now you're telling us to click the start button like we're stupid in a thread titled IQ matters.

Never go full retard, mmkay. It's unbecoming.

How ironic.

 

[dolf]

Why is it lame? It is a non letter, non-numeric, culturally unbiased test. Post one you like then?

I did take it and did not pay for it. Just click on the start the test button.

It demanded my credit card details after being denied permission to post on my Facebook page, with a countdown timer to when my results would be deleted.

Bad bad link.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

It demanded my credit card details after being denied permission to post on my Facebook page, with a countdown timer to when my results would be deleted.

Bad bad link.

Yeah that sucks. I took it a while ago and did not get charged. Just went through the test again and got the same charge and timer page. My bad.

 

[girlsmiley]

 

[BoyNextDoor]

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:00 PM, IQ Research <contact@iq-research.info> wrote:


Congratulations! You've reached the end of this IQ Test. Here is a summary of your report:

Name: [BND]
Age: 48 years old
IQ: 120.7
Score: ≥ 25 correct answers
Percentile: 90.88%
Scale: Wechsler (standard deviation of 15)

Regards,

IQ Research's team
https://iq-research.info

 

[girlsmiley]

Can someone explain to me why this cunt is so butthurt?

He posted a shit link and then he gets all bent out of shape because I tell him his link is shit.

What the fuck is your problem, cunt?

You don't know how to say, "Oh fuck, you're right. It is shit."

Instead, you carry on like a man child. "You're rude. How ironic. How ironic." Is that how you are in real life too, champ? You're hurting so you just copy everything the other person says? Like in the movies?

No one gives a flying fuck, mate. Least of all me.

 

[bellisarius]

What would be the driver for evolving a higher IQ range?

I wanna give the answer a try!


Gaining knowledge through trial and error.
Or put another way.
Learning from our mistakes and discoveries.

This is why it is important not to remove the risk vs reward decisions that humans need to make to evolve.

There is evidence that IQ, at least in the Western world, is creeping upwards over time. Why? I can only guess just like everyone else. Men and women are selecting to breed with higher IQ partners. And just guessing again I suspect that the women are driving this more so than the men. But as I said, that's merely a guess.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Can someone explain to me why this cunt is so butthurt?

He posted a shit link and then he gets all bent out of shape because I tell him his link is shit.

What the fuck is your problem, cunt?

You don't know how to say, "Oh fuck, you're right. It is shit."

Instead, you carry on like a man child. "You're rude. How ironic. How ironic." Is that how you are in real life too, champ? You're hurting so you just copy everything the other person says? Like in the movies?

No one gives a flying fuck, mate. Least of all me.

Clearly you do give a fuck. How about you run along for another six months.

 

[bellisarius]

There is evidence that IQ, at least in the Western world, is creeping upwards over time. Why? I can only guess just like everyone else. Men and women are selecting to breed with higher IQ partners. And just guessing again I suspect that the women are driving this more so than the men. But as I said, that's merely a guess.

A little supportive evidence might be WRT the Asians. East Asians test out 4 to 6 points above whites in damn near every IQ test across the board. Why should that be?

The Chinese established a form of IQ testing back in the 7th century. The 'Imperial Exams' that were used to determine who would join the Mandarin (official bureaucrats) class. Those that were chosen by the exam raised themselves, and their family, out of the peasant class, which the overwhelmingly number of Chinese were stuck in. So there was an incentive for the Chinese, and especially Chinese mothers to have children that were intelligent enough to pass the tests. 1300 years of selective breeding most likely led to the results we see today.

 

[dan_c00000]

A little supportive evidence might be WRT the Asians. East Asians test out 4 to 6 points above whites in damn near every IQ test across the board. Why should that be?

And Jews have even higher scores, what's your point? IQ is complete non-sense. The Chinese did not invent IQ tests to serve as civil services exams. In fact, the term did not appear in the English langue until 1914 or 1922 depending on the source. By the way 1914 and 1922 are 9 and 17 years after the imperial examinations were abolished. And, finally, the imperial exams were based on (more or less) memorizing the classics of Chinese literature and not on any sort of higher level cognitive skill.

 

[bellisarius]

And Jews have even higher scores, what's your point? IQ is complete non-sense. The Chinese did not invent IQ tests to serve as civil services exams. In fact, the term did not appear in the English langue until 1914 or 1922 depending on the source. By the way 1914 and 1922 are 9 and 17 years after the imperial examinations were abolished. And, finally, the imperial exams were based on (more or less) memorizing the classics of Chinese literature and not on any sort of higher level cognitive skill.

Outcomes match testing with a .7 correlation, yet it's non-sense? What's a matter, you test low?

A specific subset of Jews test higher and if you bothered to read some history you'd understand why.

As far as the Chinese 'inventing' the IQ test, that isn't what I said. I said that the Imperial Tests were a form of IQ test.

Denial of validity isn't a solution to the problem, and it IS a a problem. And it's going to get even worse as the more menial jobs are taken by automation.

 

[beew]

There is evidence that IQ, at least in the Western world, is creeping upwards over time. Why?

Men and women are selecting to breed with higher IQ partners.

Jesus bellisarius.
Next thing we know, BBx will chip in too.

Yes, biology is impprtant, but it's only part of the equation.
I would argue a lot more for nurture and opportunities over nature.

After the writing paper was invented people had more chances to stimulate their neurons. Nowadays most Western kids have access to public libraries and the internet.

I saw the movie "Dangerous beauty" a while back, and in the 16th century Venice only rich prostitutes had the luxury of reading books. Even wives of noble men weren't allowed to emancipate themselves.

And it's more likely that a third world family who's at daily from dying from hunger, will ask their kids to help them with chores, than to read a book.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I lost faith in IQ tests after I scored genius in the Mensa version. They mean fuck all in real life. Fuck all.

However, I'm still smart enough not to bother reading this thread. Lots of people trying to sound smart whilst calling each other dumb.

You are a liar, and an idiot. No one, no test, nothing EVER in the history of the universe scored your simple ass as a genius. Unless you took the test on youtube jr... and even then we both know you'd score low, in what we used to call the "Retarded" percentile. That's politically non correct, so today youd score as a "genius" AUTISTIC bitch. It all still means you are a dumb, lying, fat, pathetic cunt.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

What would be the driver for evolving a higher IQ range?

Here's the driver, one you've never coonsidered:

Not being a dummy who breeds with shitty men who throw you in the garbage, so that The State must financially raise your children... children who are born 50% shitty thanks to the shitty men love to raw dog... your kids are 50% likely to be losers as a resulte... and we both know they most likely are already losers, as you spent their formulative years on Lit trying to bang old men half way across the world while ignoring your children. (No offense Ish... she seduced you with skinny pics even thoug she was a fatty, no wonder you couldn't fuck her) (and good on you dolf, most ho-ish single moms with a revolving door of men like you end up with children who are molseted) Nasty skank, respecting youself and your children would evolve your gene pool into a higher IQ range... aint gonna happen... too late for you to care

 

[beew]

I think you got that right: most people in this forum think like this: "Me: clever. Others: dumb."

Some of the few people who showed modesty were Tryharder and.... gimme a few more hours... I'm sure I'll come up with a few more names.

 

[beew]

I lost faith in IQ tests after I scored genius in the Mensa version. They mean fuck all in real life. Fuck all.

I still don't know what you were thinking when you posted this.
Were you trying to come across as modest?
You and CoachDB

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I still don't know what you were thinking when you posted this.
Were you trying to come across as modest?
You and CoachDB

"Genius in the Mensa version" means "Railed by randos, and having children sired by men who dont give a fuck" but I am so delusional I think people believe how I spin my failures;

 

[beew]

Many consider intelligence (and personality too) to be fixed things.
In that one has only a limited window of opportunity shaped by genetics and environmental stimulation during early formative years.

But while there Is substantial truth in that, many in this thread (myself included) worry that a rigid adherence to this theory paves the way to Elitism and discrimination in the form of discrimination against the poor, even racism, ageism (re intelligence) or psychoanalysis (re personality).

But the brain is plastic, and people are still able to continue to evolve further than their formative years, provided that they are open enough and work hard enough at it. Others, on the other hand choose to stagnate and lose their gifts.
There is also recent evidence that humans only use a small % of their brain capacity. --- fascinating sci-fi type stuff

 

[Libsam]

What would be the driver for evolving a higher IQ range?

I wanna give the answer a try!


Gaining knowledge through trial and error.
Or put another way.
Learning from our mistakes and discoveries.

This is why it is important not to remove the risk vs reward decisions that humans need to make to evolve.

But what drives it higher than the level required to survive?

Ok, let me try conveying this idea through a bit of story.

If we lived in a perfect, utopian world, how would we know we were living in a perfect, utopian world? We'd have no concept of imperfection and dystopian to judge that we were living in perfection and utopia.

In other words:

How can you know what joy is if you have no concept of sorrow?

Make sense, yet?

If we lived in utopia we'd have no concept of risk vs reward, and therefore nothing to strive for. There'd be no need to evolve out of problems; because we'd be perfect.

 

[Saint Peter]

[/Star Trek]