Is a tag enough or should you really put a warning?

Opinions vary, as with all things on Lit😁

Because of the way story tags are displayed, I think many people never see them or think to check them.

Personally, I put an Ingredients List at the top of my stories. I make them a little silly, but I also include the sexual combinations involved, plus any acts or situations that I think might be polarizing to some readers. E.g.:

Ingredients list (Spoilers!):
2 cups unprofessional conference behavior
1 cup cis-female/non-binary sex
1 cup M/NB/F/F group sex
1/4 cup cis-male/non-binary sex
1/2 cup fear of cheating, jealousy
(only) 1 bed


I've gotten largely positive comments about them, and it makes me feel good to include them, so I do!
I wish I could write an ingredients list that smooth. I first encountered this with the story this came from and loved it.

As I said in my earlier post that I'd added a warning and tag list on yesterday's story release. Some people don't appreciate slow-burns.

They don't appreciate a guy sticking a finger into a girl's ass.

I added in the note that anyone searching on or attracted by the title phrase 'figure study' would be sorely disappointed if they wanted some hot model action.

I also added tags (as a warning, no so much to pick up search results) due to some light ass play/anal play, because someone didn't appreciate seeing it in my first story without a heads-up.

You can't please everyone.

Only two comments, so far. After 10K reads, no one has suggested that the tags were a bait-and-switch.

It will happen, though.
 
Fair enough, but we weren't talking about content warnings, i.e. explicit violence or rape or torture. The OP referenced specifically M/M sexual contact...
I know you're not talking to me as such, but because I did post earlier in this thread about content warnings, to clarify, when I'm talking about content warnings, this is exactly what I'm talking about.

All the "warning" stuff in my earlier post was aimed at things you'd actually want to warn against (which is why I mentioned that sometimes things you want to warn about can't be tagged, because those tags are banned, eg death, rape, torture etc).

Not stuff like M/M. This is an international website in 2026, M/M content isn't a "warning."

Eg my latest story was the third chapter in a series. It's featured M/F and F/M sex only so far (and variants of it, like MMMMM/F) but there's been no M/M action. In chapter 3, there was one moment of M/M action. Did I warn against it? No. there's nothing to warn against.

Did I tag it? (I just had to check because I couldn't remember) Also, no, because a) I ran out of tags and b) it was such a small moment. One sex act in 25k words didn't seem to warrant it. If I had more tags I might have included it. If I wrote adorable little ingredients lists like Penny, I probably would have included it as a pinch or sprinkle or something.
 
Oh yeah. I forgot there is a limit to the number of tags you can... um... tag... your story with. Another good reason to add @TarnishedPenny 's (c) recipe or kink warning of some sort at the start. We can be nice. It's not required, but it is... Nice. Nice is missing these days.
 
I don’t think you should worry. You traffic in NonHuman, which I understand is a diverse category with a motley of largely distinct themes/kinks/whatchagonnacallits, so readers who seek those are presumably conditioned to check the tags.
Motley is actually the collective noun for Non-Human writers and readers. "The motley sat together and discussed the merits of werewolving knotting kinks."
 
Motley is actually the collective noun for Non-Human writers and readers. "The motley sat together and discussed the merits of werewolving knotting kinks."
It’s also an adjective indicating diversity and the name of the garment a ‘fool’ wears. I guess you could say, “The motley motley sat together in their motleys discussing the merits of werewolving knotting kinks, while listening to Motley Crue.”
 
It’s also an adjective indicating diversity and the name of the garment a ‘fool’ wears. I guess you could say, “The motley motley sat together in their motleys discussing the merits of werewolving knotting kinks, while listening to Motley Crue.”
I'm fairly certain they stole "motley" from the Literotica NonHuman collective noun group, went back in time, and tried to gaslight everyone that it's been a thing this whole time. I've spent decades trying to prove this.

They, of course, being Motley Crue.
 
Back
Top