Is the Democrat party the historic home of racism?

[Boxlicker101]

Vote-wise there were ten million fewer Trompniks than anti-Trompniks. Nice mandate, Donnie. Keep it up.

ObTopic: States Righters were the classic base of racism in USA.

And there were about seven million more people who voted against Silly Hilly than voted for her.

And most states righters have been Democrats.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Maybe it makes a difference to historians.

Which party accepts racists now?

Both major parties accept anybody who will join them.

 

[Saint Peter]

Anyone who voted for Trump is racist

No doubt.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Anyone who voted for Trump is racist ...

Preach, brother lovecraft68!

 

[Hypoxia]

And there were about seven million more people who voted against Silly Hilly than voted for her.

Four million. Including me. Whereas the anti-Tromp margin was ten million.

But I digress. Racism generations ago doesn't matter NOW. What party NOW harbors explicit racists? Which party head was convicted of racism?

 

[WoundedKnee]

Yes, historically, the Democrat was the party of racism, that's why they react so vigorously to an examination of their history and the sheltering of racists in their party right up to my coming of age (and they would probably accept some even to this very day if they thought it would tip the balance of power).

Currently, the Democrat Party is the party of Racialism where they build and command blocks of voters based upon race and manufactured grievance. This is why one of their first serious charges in any debate is that of Racism. This is why they continually claim that the Republicans are a Racist party based upon the slimmest manufactured evidence, whimsey and fantasy. This is why they leap into the breach to dominate the news when it comes to the police harming criminals of color even ignoring the actual statistics of who shoots who. If you consider the number of threads celebrating the coming white minority and the number of posts warning whites to stay quiet because they are coming for you, it reminds me of that old-time Democrat movie, Birth of a Nation, only now I would call the use of the angry black man, Rebirth of a Nation.

 

[coachdb18]

So, if we've always been racists, now and forever, that explains our racist president - right? Who, just days ago, referred to African countries as shithole countries? Makes sense. That also explains why we put a black man in the White House as President for two terms, right?

Obama's racism is epic, with a legacy of racism for his entire eight years Lynch, Holder, the years of depravity at the 'Justice department.... Obama was the result of Democratic racism that took our country onto a more divisive path that set race relations back decades.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Yes, historically, the Democrat was the party of racism, that's why they react so vigorously to an examination of their history and the sheltering of racists in their party right up to my coming of age (and they would probably accept some even to this very day if they thought it would tip the balance of power).

Currently, the Democrat Party is the party of Racialism where they build and command blocks of voters based upon race and manufactured grievance. This is why one of their first serious charges in any debate is that of Racism. This is why they continually claim that the Republicans are a Racist party based upon the slimmest manufactured evidence, whimsey and fantasy. This is why they leap into the breach to dominate the news when it comes to the police harming criminals of color even ignoring the actual statistics of who shoots who. If you consider the number of threads celebrating the coming white minority and the number of posts warning whites to stay quiet because they are coming for you, it reminds me of that old-time Democrat movie, Birth of a Nation, only now I would call the use of the angry black man, Rebirth of a Nation.

As you say, Democrats have always been the party of racism, and they still are, but their racism takes a different form. It used to be something like, and please excuse the language: "Niggers are too stupid and lazy to ever amount to anything, that's why we own them and make them pick our cotton and other simple jobs like that." Then, when Republicans made them stop doing that, it became: "Niggers are stupid and lazy and good for nothing and they all want to rape our women, so we want nothing to do with them. Just keep them away from us."

When Republicans, and some Democrats, made them lose that attitude, the Dems adopted a different form of racism, which can be called "The soft racism of lowered expectations." It goes something like: "Oh, those poor darkies with their little picaninies! They are stupid and ignorant and lazy and violent and immoral, but it's not their fault! It's the fault of those nasty white people who enslaved them for so long. (and never mind that it was the ancestors of the current Democrats who were the slave owners) And now we have to hold their hands and blow their noses and give them everything they want, just like the children they are. If that means hiring them and promoting them in preference to others, and ignoring their lower qualifications, then so be it. If that means supporting them and their children, then so be it. They are the white man's burden.

Of course, Republicans don't like this, but they are stuck. Rather than hiring and promoting based on merit, we have affirmative action. Rather than requiring people to support their own families, we have welfare. The current form of racism espoused by Democrats does not involve violence and abuse, but it's just as bad in its own way

 

[Sean]

It's like the RWCJ have never heard of Goldwater, Nixon or the Southern Strategy.

 

[phrodeau]

I wonder what jobs program the Republicans will create for the poor white trash with their rugrats and their stupid and ignorant and lazy and violent and immoral attitudes.

 

[Boxlicker101]

It's like the RWCJ have never heard of Goldwater, Nixon or the Southern Strategy.

Everybody has heard of those people, but they have also heard of Bilbo and Maddox and Faubus and George Wallace and "The Solid South."

 

[Hypoxia]

I wonder what jobs program the Republicans will create for the poor white trash with their rugrats and their stupid and ignorant and lazy and violent and immoral attitudes.

They won't get jobs at Mar-a-Lago; they aren't foreign. They won't get jobs in the administration; vacancies are going unfilled. I guess they'll end up in TSA.

Blue- and white-collar jobs are being taken by automation and AI, not by aliens. Such work will not be resurrected for humans. What jobs areas are growing? Nurses, medical assistants, bedpan changers. Women's work. Men's jobs are going extinct. Maybe it's time to restructure society.

Everybody has heard of those people...

Nobody under age 40 has heard of any of those people. To USA college students, 9/11 is near-ancient history set in an endless MidEast war. The civil rights struggle is as remote to them as the pre-WWI world was to me. OPEC's rise (1972) might as well be the Standard Oil breakup (1912). Yawn.

 

[Luk]

Obama's racism is epic, with a legacy of racism for his entire eight years Lynch, Holder, the years of depravity at the 'Justice department.... Obama was the result of Democratic racism that took our country onto a more divisive path that set race relations back decades.

Is he more racist against his white mother or black father? You make me glad I turned Mensa down.

 

[Que]

Is he more racist against his white mother or black father? You make me glad I turned Mensa down.

Mensa's roving recruitment team tracked you down, did they?

 

[Adder4321]

They won't get jobs at Mar-a-Lago; they aren't foreign. They won't get jobs in the administration; vacancies are going unfilled. I guess they'll end up in TSA.

Blue- and white-collar jobs are being taken by automation and AI, not by aliens. Such work will not be resurrected for humans. What jobs areas are growing? Nurses, medical assistants, bedpan changers. Women's work. Men's jobs are going extinct. Maybe it's time to restructure society.

Or maybe people could be smart and get jobs working on the machines used for automation. And society won't restructure, not easily anyway. In truth, most people hate change, even if it's beneficial for them.

 

[Liar]

Is the Democrat party the historic home of racism?

Unclear, since there's no party by that name.

 

[Hypoxia]

Or maybe people could be smart and get jobs working on the machines used for automation.

We're entering a future foreseen a few generations ago (by Vonnegut and others), a world of self-maintaining and -controlling machines and surplus people. USA today hasn't jobs for everyone willing. Autonomous delivery vehicles, self- or drone-served retail, AIs replacing professionals (radiologists are obsolete now), robotic agriculture and food prep -- these and more will further eliminate humans from the production chain. Expect guaranteed incomes, or uprisings.

And society won't restructure, not easily anyway. In truth, most people hate change, even if it's beneficial for them.

Societies evolve and restructure constantly. USA 2020 will definitely NOT be like USA 1970.

ObTopic: Anyone thinking the Dum party of 2020 is related to Dums of 1970 or 1920 or 1870 has serious cognitive problems. Change your meds.

 

[Luk]

Mensa's roving recruitment team tracked you down, did they?

Sorry I brought that up- I know how jealous you can be.

 

[GiaCat]

I have an idea: why not make up your own opinion instead of relying on other people's thoughts?

I always make up my own mind. But that is not done in a vacuum. One can only form an opinion by hearing a variety of other's opinions and facts that where unknown.

I do think it will be hard to dispel what is presented in this video. Seems like just cold hard facts. I do believe much in this video is not common knowledge, so its is educational and eye opening for others..